Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
"I go to" in neither grammatically incorrect nor literally incorrect. As i have already said, this is not where i come to write formal letters and essays.
and you just posted on another thread that banged someone's mom like a screen door in a hurricane.... is this also a good example of how to covey my thoughts?
I'd tell ya what I do to your mom, but you would cry even more. Bukkake!!!!!!!!!!
(Can you show me where?) Even if it is, its still a belief.
For example: If capital punishment was a Constitutionally held practice, you still reserve your right to believe it is right or wrong.
I'm not saying that at all. Stop misinterpreting. I'm saying, within our laws, it should be allowed. Why should any group of people be denied rights granted to others?
So to use your terrible, terrible example. If capital punishment were dictated by the Constitution, I'd be all for it. They would have to execute everyone equally, even the gays. Where is your arguement to that? You can't just exclude a certain group because of your "feelings".
I'm not saying that at all. Stop misinterpreting. I'm saying, within our laws, it should be allowed. Why should any group of people be denied rights granted to others?
So to use your terrible, terrible example. If capital punishment were dictated by the Constitution, I'd be all for it. They would have to execute everyone equally, even the gays. Where is your arguement to that? You can't just exclude a certain group because of your "feelings".
Can you please show me where seperation of church and state is in the Constitution?
I am sorry if I am misinterpreting, but I don't care if you agree or disagree with capital punishment. That wasn't my arguement. I think we are veering off topic anyway.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Exactly. Amendment 1, not Article 1. Thus, my point... What the Government denotes as lawful or unlawful (which can change with more amendments) does not make it true.
Marriage as defined by the Bible will never change from being solely between a man and a woman. So even if it is legalized in all 50 states and a gay couple gets "married", it is not actually marriage. It is 2 same-sex people that are together with a legal title of "married" even though they aren't. Homosexual marriage is an oxymoron.
This entire issue MUST be based on beliefs (or "feelings" if that is what you call them). However, what the source is for these beliefs is a different story.
For those of you that believe homosexuality doesn't occur in nature, look closer. While it is perceived as an unnatural behavior in the human race, it happens quite naturally within many species in nature. Look up different types of primates; ie. Bonobos, or other mammals like Dolphins, even with birds and insects.
'99 Camaro
'04 Saab 9-3 Aero
'90 Audi Coupe Quattro
Exactly. Amendment 1, not Article 1. Thus, my point... What the Government denotes as lawful or unlawful (which can change with more amendments) does not make it true.
Marriage as defined by the Bible will never change from being solely between a man and a woman. So even if it is legalized in all 50 states and a gay couple gets "married", it is not actually marriage. It is 2 same-sex people that are together with a legal title of "married" even though they aren't.
This entire issue MUST be based on beliefs (or "feelings" if that is what you call them). However, what the source is for these beliefs is a different story.
Still trying to find oil leak on my Camaro, it’s a tough one. I think it is the oil pressure sender myself. Leaking when raving and going into boost....
3 days ago
FORUM SPONSORS
Collapse
Working...
X
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment