Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
93- 97 firebird formulas what do you think about them?
I use to bash on the LT1's even when I 1st purchased my 95.. I was wanting to swap in a LS1. I took it to the track and was hoping for a 13.9 pass and ran a 13.6 on a crappy 60'.. That one time at the track has changed my opinion of the LT1's. I love the way the car sounds and how the car just drives. I had to own a LT1 to appreciate it.
I have 1 question. What is the difference between the LT1 f-bodies and the LT1 vettes power wise? I have met a couple of C4 vette owners that say that there vettes stock run low 13's and even met one last night with a 94 that has a catback and went 12.9@107 with the catback being the only mod.. My 95 went 101 with a stall and airfoil. Of course his vette was a 6 speed
if i remember right the vettes were rated at 300 even due to a slightly larger cam, so i can see them doing stock ls1 times since their a good bit lighter than fbodies.
current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it
if i remember right the vettes were rated at 300 even due to a slightly larger cam, so i can see them doing stock ls1 times since their a good bit lighter than fbodies.
F-body Lt1s had aluminum heads as well. As far as the Y-body ones, I know they have 4 bolt mains, and I think your right on the cam being a bit bigger.
the only lt1 that didnt have aluminum heads were the ones in the impalas, which were iron and oddly enough actually flow a **** load better than the aluminum ones until they get heat soaked, then they flow like crap. vette lt1 cams were bigger for sure, i cant remember the specs off the top of my head but its not a HUGE difference but its enough to put some room between them and the fbody in terms of power.
current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment