Tell them. Hey where is the muscle in your 1985 Trans Am's with the 305? hahahahaha
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you consider the V6 F-body a "muscle car"? I don't....
Collapse
X
-
The 1985 engines of the trans am
Type Displacement Horsepower Torque Induction
OHV I-4 151/2.5 88@4400 132@2800 TBI
OHV V-6 173/2.8 135@5100 165@3600 PFI
OHV V-8 305/5.0 165@4200 250@2400 4 bbl
OHV V-8 305/5.0 190@48080 240@3200 4 bbl
OHV V-8 305/5.0 205@4400 275@3200 TPI
Looks like poop to me!
Comment
-
Originally posted by majeskyb:
Well, the industry is changing what they call muscle. http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/st...517184230.html , they are calling civics muscle cars
"Now, you can take a little Cavalier, flop a turbo on it and put bigger injectors on it and you can squeeze 500 horsepower out of that thing with just the blink of an eye -- and still make 25 miles a gallon. It's the best of two worlds; you have the total driveablility, you have the reliability and the fuel economy but when you stomp on it, boy, it's going to set you back in the seat real quick."
Yea, im sure that FWD cavilier will have great reliability on a stock engine boosting enough to make 500 horsepower and great fuel economy.
Whoever wrote this article should be banned from talking about cars to the public.
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
by DongrossmdI’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...3 weeks ago
-
by ssms5411Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...3 weeks ago
Comment