-
-
I don't understand what you guys expect. Its a 4 door family sedan that never looked good in the first place. 'Cept way back, but even then they looked like everything else. Are you all expecting a sports car?
Not only that, the 2004 V6 FWD SS impala is faster than the "wonderful" 1996 SS isn't it? So this 2006 is an improvement and is exactly what its supposed to be, an ugly family sedan with a big engine for so so performance. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
[ September 11, 2005, 08:27 PM: Message edited by: JusFlyinBy ]<a href=\"http://dpo.rpaisley.com/displayfile.do?file_id=11856&size=ORIGINAL\" target=\"_blank\">05 GTO</a><br /><a href=\"http://dpo.rpaisley.com/displayfile.do?file_id=2825&size=ORIGINAL\" target=\"_blank\">97 W68</a><br /><a href=\"http://dpo.rpaiComment
-
:D YEP. The new Eclipses are HOT. I've seen 2 of them on the road and both times I was like... what is that?!?! til I saw the "Eclipse" on back. And a 3.8 with 240 or 250 horse? Yeah, I'd take that over one of GM's lame cars anyday... cept' maybe the Vette... ;) </font>[/QUOTE]yeah they look good but that 250 horses only sounds good until you hear how much those fat little b@st@rds weigh... way to much to be considered "sporty"... my opinion so flame on...Originally posted by Shirl:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />originally posted by Navyblue2000:
wait wait wait...
you think GM cars look like crap, but you're considering a 4G eclipse?
disclaimer: \"warning.. this post may contain somewhat of a funny comment if read properly... take my comment out of context at your own discretion...\"Comment
-
Its actually 263 horses. 3500 + lbs. though. Not bad. People have been running low-mid 14s though stock. Too bad theres no AWD or turbo version...Black \'94 Trans Am A4- SLP CAI & Loudmouth<br />Red \'93 Firebird A4- Ram Air under the WS6 hood, !cat, exhaust.Comment
-
wow! That little car weighs that much! What a little porker...2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
2011 Cadillac CTS-V
2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSComment
-
Eh...not really. The SS was mostly an appearance package in the 60s/70s. It was rarely the top performing model in a particular car line. They use it now for marketing, and just happen to toss some extra hp in the mix as well - sounds good to me.Originally posted by Shirl:
Yeah, they destroyed the SS nameplate. Oh well..
I think the only time they ruined the SS name is when they stuck it on a Camaro that was faster than the Z/28....that's lame.
- Justin<a href=\"http://www.njfboa.org\" target=\"_blank\">New Jersey F-Body Owners Association</a><br />1987 Camaro LT - 400sbc, Aluminum L98\'s w/valve job, Comp XE 274, Q-Junk 750, 3.23 posi, 4.10\'s soon.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.njfboa.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=11\" target=\"_blank\">East Coast F-Body Nationals - August 14, 2005</a>Comment
Tweet
-
I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...3 weeks ago -
Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...4 weeks ago
Comment