Girl delema

[GrigoryRasputin]

dangerousv6: a condom is 98-99% effective when used properly
a condom is about 80% effective over all when including all those people who **** up and put it on their thumb or just sit there and let themselves go limp while theyre inside her.

[HAZ-Matt]

Now for my real post.

If you feel that there is too much of a maturity gap between you and the girl, and if you feel that she does not understand or care about your personal set of beliefs, you should probably end the relationship.

[WishIHad$$$]

Hahaha I love the ka50 ownage in this thread.

[ka50]

Originally posted by GrigoryRasputin:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ka50:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Ender2664:
Sorry i can't spell. Well here is the situation
I am 19 year old male that lives in socal, I am dateing a 17 year old female that lives about half a mile away from me. We have been going together for about 4 months now and we both like each other a tone, and she allways tells me how much she loves me. All good right, well we get in small little fights that come from her being younger than i am and less mature. Well here is the whole deal, as the days are going by, we are getting more and more serious. (i am a virgin and stayings so until marage, and she is pushing me to have sex) But i am just kind of worried. Cause the whole thing is that this is literally my first girl friend, and the first girl that i have ever kissed. I don't just hook up with chick, i like to be a gentle man. But the thing is that i kind of want to see what else is out there, cause after all this is my first relationship, and as the days go she is more and more in love with me. So i am just being an idiot and i should shut my mouth and continue with her, or should we take a break or something so that i can see what else is out there, and if she is really right for me? Plz give me your opionons cause i have no past experiance to draw upon, i am sure that i will add more info to the post as time goes on and i think of more relevant things.

Not to offend your beliefs, but are you sure you're true heterosexual? Waiting til marriage? roflmao... dude you're being brainwashed pretty good.

What is the reason to wait? Pregnancy? Use rubber with nonoxinol-9 (spermicide)... STD's? Use rubber, chances of getting a serious STD's are extremely low with rubber.

You've been with a girl 4 months and haven't had sex yet? LMAO...

now, assuming in your state the legal age is 17 or 16, RUN and 12 pack of rubbers, RUN to your girl right now. Start kissing her, light petting, heavy petting, then start underessing her, slap on the rubber and have fun.

lol dude seriously grow up and be a man

actually, the age of consent is 18 in california.
http://www.ageofconsent.com/ageofconsent.htm

so it all depends if you want to risk or not </font>[/QUOTE]Yet again pulling FAR into the lead for the most immature poster on the board. You be a man and acknowledge that some people want to do things differently than you. Besides - it seems this guy is presented by a problem he may have some control over... some girl WANTS to have sex with him... How do you plan on rectifying the problem that no girl in their right mind wants to have sex with a small dicked immature little boy that cant get his head out of his ***? </font>[/QUOTE]You've got lots to learn my friend, lots and lots of learning to do about women lol :D go jerk off to some porn or something

Let's address this issue though:
You're saying he has a right to have his beliefs. Yes. Now the question is: are those really his beliefs or beliefs of someone else, that he took upon himself? I doubt any independantly thinking heterosexual male would take up someone else's beliefs that would limit his sexual activity. If you were smart enough, you would understand that throughout history men in power attempted to control what men without power thought and the way they behaved. Nowdays it's less obvious, but the simple fact of society trying to shame male sexual behavior is already an idicator of that. Real men would laugh at it and have sex with women as they please, because they have inner male power and health sexual MALE drive. Weaker men would submit to this shame and suppress their male drives, justifying it.

[1DangerousV6]

ummm...men have evolved...get with the times...obviously you havent

[ka50]

Originally posted by 1DangerousV6:
did you know condoms only give you 70% protection?...when you end up with AIDS you wont be living life to the fullest anymore...30% is too large for me...let him take it slow...granted you can take certain measures...but theres no way around it...when you sleep with someone...you're sleeping with everyone they've slept with...from a medical point of view...have you ever watched someone die of aids?...NOT in the movies?...i've had sex with my share of girls...but damn dude...i cant believe you just called him a pussy for that...that was more immature than ME...and that says something lol..

Even unprotected vaginal sex is considered low risk for transmission of HIV/AIDS. Ask any health professional.

With rubber you're reducing it to extremely low numbers.

Any man who supresses or doesn't have healthy sexual male drive is a pussy.

[1DangerousV6]

Originally posted by ka50:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 1DangerousV6:
did you know condoms only give you 70% protection?...when you end up with AIDS you wont be living life to the fullest anymore...30% is too large for me...let him take it slow...granted you can take certain measures...but theres no way around it...when you sleep with someone...you're sleeping with everyone they've slept with...from a medical point of view...have you ever watched someone die of aids?...NOT in the movies?...i've had sex with my share of girls...but damn dude...i cant believe you just called him a pussy for that...that was more immature than ME...and that says something lol..

Even unprotected vaginal sex is considered low risk for transmission of HIV/AIDS. Ask any health professional.

With rubber you're reducing it to extremely low numbers.

Any man who supresses or doesn't have health sexual male drive is a pussy. </font>[/QUOTE]maybe once or twice...but not with someone that you have sex with repetedly because you are in a relationship with them

[ka50]

Originally posted by WishIHad$$$:
Hahaha I love the ka50 ownage in this thread.

Weaker men also tend to jump on bandwagons more often...

[GrigoryRasputin]

Originally posted by ka50:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 1DangerousV6:
did you know condoms only give you 70% protection?...when you end up with AIDS you wont be living life to the fullest anymore...30% is too large for me...let him take it slow...granted you can take certain measures...but theres no way around it...when you sleep with someone...you're sleeping with everyone they've slept with...from a medical point of view...have you ever watched someone die of aids?...NOT in the movies?...i've had sex with my share of girls...but damn dude...i cant believe you just called him a pussy for that...that was more immature than ME...and that says something lol..

Even unprotected vaginal sex is considered low risk for transmission of HIV/AIDS. Ask any health professional.

With rubber you're reducing it to extremely low numbers.

Any man who supresses or doesn't have healthy sexual male drive is a pussy. </font>[/QUOTE]youre right, vaginal to penis contact offers a lower probability of HIV/AIDS than anal sex. However its not LOW RISK as you'd like to say... and this is also ignoring the other several STIs that exist.

As for your defintion of a male - I surmise I probably have more sex than you on a regular basis. I dont brag about it and this isnt why I think Im better than you. I simply think Im better than you b/c youre an idiot and I am not. Its quite simple actually.

[1DangerousV6]

sorry man...bandwagon excuse doesnt work...i used to try that when i had a controvertial thread going...with posts like this...it usually means that maybe you should re-think your position on some things..

[1DangerousV6]

Originally posted by GrigoryRasputin:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ka50:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 1DangerousV6:
did you know condoms only give you 70% protection?...when you end up with AIDS you wont be living life to the fullest anymore...30% is too large for me...let him take it slow...granted you can take certain measures...but theres no way around it...when you sleep with someone...you're sleeping with everyone they've slept with...from a medical point of view...have you ever watched someone die of aids?...NOT in the movies?...i've had sex with my share of girls...but damn dude...i cant believe you just called him a pussy for that...that was more immature than ME...and that says something lol..

Even unprotected vaginal sex is considered low risk for transmission of HIV/AIDS. Ask any health professional.

With rubber you're reducing it to extremely low numbers.

Any man who supresses or doesn't have healthy sexual male drive is a pussy. </font>[/QUOTE]youre right, vaginal to penis contact offers a lower probability of HIV/AIDS than anal sex. However its not LOW RISK as you'd like to say... and this is also ignoring the other several STIs that exist.

As for your defintion of a male - I surmise I probably have more sex than you on a regular basis. I dont brag about it and this isnt why I think Im better than you. I simply think Im better than you b/c youre an idiot and I am not. Its quite simple actually. </font>[/QUOTE][img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]

[ka50]

Originally posted by GrigoryRasputin:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ka50:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 1DangerousV6:
did you know condoms only give you 70% protection?...when you end up with AIDS you wont be living life to the fullest anymore...30% is too large for me...let him take it slow...granted you can take certain measures...but theres no way around it...when you sleep with someone...you're sleeping with everyone they've slept with...from a medical point of view...have you ever watched someone die of aids?...NOT in the movies?...i've had sex with my share of girls...but damn dude...i cant believe you just called him a pussy for that...that was more immature than ME...and that says something lol..

Even unprotected vaginal sex is considered low risk for transmission of HIV/AIDS. Ask any health professional.

With rubber you're reducing it to extremely low numbers.

Any man who supresses or doesn't have healthy sexual male drive is a pussy. </font>[/QUOTE]youre right, vaginal to penis contact offers a lower probability of HIV/AIDS than anal sex. However its not LOW RISK as you'd like to say... and this is also ignoring the other several STIs that exist.

As for your defintion of a male - I surmise I probably have more sex than you on a regular basis. I dont brag about it and this isnt why I think Im better than you. I simply think Im better than you b/c youre an idiot and I am not. Its quite simple actually. </font>[/QUOTE]Well, if you ask your health professional about vaginal sex, instead of anal sex (which you seem to be so concerned about), he/she would tell you that HIV/AIDS transmission is low risk for one time unprotected vaginal intercourse. It doesn't mean it's 0 chance, it means chances are low.
But we're talking about nothing here, I'm talking about using rubber, which some people here having hard time comprehending. Use the friggin rubber! Should I say this again? USE THE RUBBER. I prefer ultra sensitive. If you prefer anal sex, use specially designed rubbers.

But yes, I think your experiences in anal sex speaks for itself.
lol
have fun with your partners! Remeber about the extra strengh rubber I mentioned.

[1DangerousV6]

dude...STDs probably arent his only reason for wanting to wait...and i like to think im pretty open-minded...im not saying you're WRONG (and if i did i apologize) ..everyone's entitled to their own opinion...and of course you can disagree...but its the WAY you did it...opinions on some topics are just more sensitive than others...we're not talking about a choice of freaking rims here or something...(mmmmmmmm....rimsssssss) ..i just think calling him a pussy for his opinion on this topic was pretty out of line

[ka50]

Originally posted by 1DangerousV6:
sorry man...bandwagon excuse doesnt work...i used to try that when i had a controvertial thread going...with posts like this...it usually means that maybe you should re-think your position on some things..

Think about it. Before people thought the world was flat. If you thought otherwise you'd be labeled a fool.

Now, because 99.9% of people on this board are totally clueless about how women/man dynamics work, it's not my fault that I have a totally independent opinion. I never brag about my women, but I'm willing to put 500$ right now that I've had more women in the past year than you probably have had in your lifetime. It didn't take me 1 day to learn all the stuff about man-woman dynamics. It took me years. Now I just reap the rewards and laugh at you fools on car messageboard attempting to prove me wrong.

[GrigoryRasputin]

My mom, who is a OB/GYN (you know... MORE qualified than me and CERTAINLY more qualified than you to answer this question) seems to think that having unprotected sex places you in a high risk for transmission of aids/hiv.

As for all of your allusions to my "homosexuality" b/c I told you that anal sex is a higher risk than vaginal sex... I'll go ahead and remind you that I could have said "Your mom didnt seem too concerned about aids when I was throwing it in her *** raw dog..." but notice I refrained from saying that b/c I wouldnt want to conjur up anymore images in your mind of your mom getting pounded by someone who wasnt your dad.

Jackass.