Originally posted by kinetic:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by vanbibber:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by brink:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by vanbibber:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by kinetic:
does an unmodded supra engine have comparable power and torque as an unmodded LS1?
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by vanbibber:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by brink:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by vanbibber:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by kinetic:
does an unmodded supra engine have comparable power and torque as an unmodded LS1?
http://www.fast-autos.net/toyota/97toyotasupra.html
http://www.fast-autos.net/chevrolet/...maroanniv.html
anymore questions? </font>[/QUOTE]he did the research </font>[/QUOTE]god youre an idiot. [img]graemlins/slap.gif[/img] the fact of the matter is, both cars are almost equal.
thanks to you, i thank god everyday im not half as dumb as you are. </font>[/QUOTE]no, actually, you're an idiot.
without the turbos, the supra engine would be pretty feeble.
put turbos on an LS1, and I guarantee, it would be a different story.
perhaps I should have said "naturally aspirated" :rolleyes: </font>[/QUOTE]you are not understanding me obviously. if it comes from the factory it is stock what is so hard about that?
you two keep coming back with AND I QUOTE: well if you put a turbo on a ls1 it would be a different story.
thats the typically ls1 nutswinger comment everytime a turbo charged import beats a ls1.
ls1- great engine it is, end all engine its not.
Comment