Torque management? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Torque management?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by BLLDOGG:
    im pretty sure its not a GM thing.
    [img]graemlins/twak.gif[/img] Thats why TSP removes it when tuning? lol
    00\' firebird v6 5spd<br />201rwhp ---- 230 rwtq<br />\"Everyday I grow stronger...and further from you.\"<br />WARNING: Do not take any of my comments seriously unless they are technical in nature and then only at your own risk

    Comment


    • #17
      my mistake in my writing, i meant not "just" a GM thing
      2000 3.8 A4 Pewter Camaro

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by SirShaun:
        Is that why my friends 2000 3.8 auto mustang can get second and my car doesnt even jerk when it hit second?
        it was in response to this
        2000 3.8 A4 Pewter Camaro

        Comment


        • #19
          The 2004 GTP's have crazy amounts of torque management built into the PCM. Horrible torque management off the line, and the reduces throttle to about 50% (gotta love electronic throttle :mad: ) on the 1-2 shift. Thankfully my car doesn't have these issues :D
          New Car: 2004 GTP Comp G (Test Vehicle) 13.936@99.32 <br />Mods: Cylinder Filter,No Mufflers, 3.3\" <br />Old Car: 2000 Formula 13.124 @ 106.01 with 2.73\'s<br />Other Car: 1993 Firebird 16.1@83

          Comment


          • #20
            Ok ok, my mistake. I had never heard of torque management being that. I am a manual guy.
            UAH FSAE<br />Chief Engineer<br /> <a href=\"http://chargermotorsports.com\" target=\"_blank\">http://chargermotorsports.com</a> <br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/camaronat\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/camaronat</a>

            Comment

            Latest Topics

            Collapse

            FORUM SPONSORS

            Collapse
            Working...
            X