Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by 98Camaro3.8: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 3.4 slow to go: so then, let's take water.
it's moving in the opposite direction of the plane's speed. will the plane take off? NO
Yes it would.
If the plane used an underwater propeller, no it would not. </font>[/QUOTE]riiiiiiiiiiiiight, because the skis would be traveling twice as fast as the plane.......yeah,that's the ticket
1978 Formula 461 in progress of being built :rock:
2013 Ram 1500 Big Horn
former owner of 85 bird w/ 2.8 - 3.4 - 3800 II - 5.0
94 comero 3.4
Originally posted by 3.4 slow to go: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 98Camaro3.8: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 3.4 slow to go: so then, let's take water.
it's moving in the opposite direction of the plane's speed. will the plane take off? NO
Yes it would.
If the plane used an underwater propeller, no it would not. </font>[/QUOTE]riiiiiiiiiiiiight, because the skis would be traveling twice as fast as the plane.......yeah,that's the ticket </font>[/QUOTE]LOL. Good one. We should have worded better that the wheel wasn't actually going twice the speed of the plane, merely rotating the amount of times necessary for it to go twice the speed of the plane if the treadmill were not rolling backwards at the speed of which the plane was rolling foward.
In this case, the ski and plane would travel at the same rate, because there are no revolutions of the ski involved.
Originally posted by airfrmr: My point is your a dumba$$. bernoulli's principle is for fluid not air retard.
This is the funniest thing I have ever read.
Ever.
Matt is 100000000000000000% correct on this one guys.
Here is something to help you visualize it...
If the plane were sitting on the treadmill, just say, with no thrust, and the treadmill was running at 1000 miles and hour, would the plane move? No, the wheels would simple free wheel, while the plane sits there. (small amounts of friction aside). This should show you that the treadmill has no effect other than speeding up the tires. Now add thrust, the plane moves forward, just like off a runway, but the tires are going twice as fast.
1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
1997 Dodge Viper GTS
Originally posted by AZ3.8Camaro:
Here is something to help you visualize it...
If the plane were sitting on the treadmill, just say, with no thrust, and the treadmill was running at 1000 miles and hour, would the plane move? No, the wheels would simple free wheel, while the plane sits there. (small amounts of friction aside). This should show you that the treadmill has no effect other than speeding up the tires. Now add thrust, the plane moves forward, just like off a runway, but the tires are going twice as fast. [/QB]
nomatterhow many times you say it, you're still wrong. what is holding the plane in placewhile this treadmill is going? nothig, thus the plane will move backwards. And even for this to work in the original question, the plane would be moving at 1000 mph.
1978 Formula 461 in progress of being built :rock:
2013 Ram 1500 Big Horn
former owner of 85 bird w/ 2.8 - 3.4 - 3800 II - 5.0
94 comero 3.4
Originally posted by 3.4 slow to go: what is holding the plane in placewhile this treadmill is going? nothig, thus the plane will move backwards. And even for this to work in the original question, the plane would be moving at 1000 mph.
FRICTION! Friction is what would move the plane on the treadmill with no engine thrust. As SOON as the engines make enough thrust to overcome the small amount of friction allowing the plane move backwards on the treadmill, it will propel forward.
Objects in rest remain at rest until a force is applied on it. As soon as the treamill starts to move, the friction is the force that keeps the wheels from turning and would allow the plane to move backwards. If there was absolutely no friction in the wheels, the plane would sit stationary as the treadmill moved because there would be no force exerted on it causing it to move backwards
Air and all gases are fluids, btw. Anything that isn't solid is a fluid. The only difference between liquids and gases is compressibility.
The plane will take off on a treadmill. Car analogies are not correct. The traction of rubber is a non-issue - the wheel rolls, just like one a car. Rolling friction is tiny.
The way to make the airplane not take off is to ignore the ground and anything to do with the wheels. If the wheels were so important to get the plane moving, how would they fly once they took off?
You need a wind tunnel that provides a tailwind that matches the plane's ground speed. The plane can roll as fast as it wants, but with no air moving over the wings it can't take off.
Drivetrain Moderator - "There are no stupid questions, only stupid people!"
2001 Pewter Firebird Y87, M5
Intake, exhaust, just about every suspension part, alum flywheel & ds, Turn One p/s pump and cooler
Originally posted by MTMike: Friction is what would move the plane on the treadmill with no engine thrust. As SOON as the engines make enough thrust to overcome the small amount of friction allowing the plane move backwards on the treadmill, it will propel forward.
and the treadmill will move in with an equall amount of force in opposite direction.
Originally posted by zlexiss:
The way to make the airplane not take off is to ignore the ground and anything to do with the wheels. If the wheels were so important to get the plane moving, how would they fly once they took off?
You need a wind tunnel that provides a tailwind that matches the plane's ground speed. The plane can roll as fast as it wants, but with no air moving over the wings it can't take off.
then like I said before, remove the wheels and let the plane sit on the tarmac. will it still produce enough thrust to move & take off?
and your second points confirms what many others and I have said, it will NOT take off.
1978 Formula 461 in progress of being built :rock:
2013 Ram 1500 Big Horn
former owner of 85 bird w/ 2.8 - 3.4 - 3800 II - 5.0
94 comero 3.4
Originally posted by 3.4 slow to go: and the treadmill will move in with an equall amount of force in opposite direction.
But with no friction, that force isn't transferred. Unless the landing gear is providing enough friction equal and opposite the thrust of the engines, the plane will move forward.
Originally posted by 3.4 slow to go: the landing gear doesn't need to, the treadmill is counteracting the thrust. the wheels will end up just spinning w/the plane not moving
So you're telling me that Newton is rolling over in his grave and that the 400 ton plane with frictionless wheels will suddenly start moving without a force exerted on it?
Explain to me how the force will be transfered to the plane through frictionless landing gear from the treadmill?
Originally posted by 3.4 slow to go: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by AZ3.8Camaro:
Here is something to help you visualize it...
If the plane were sitting on the treadmill, just say, with no thrust, and the treadmill was running at 1000 miles and hour, would the plane move? No, the wheels would simple free wheel, while the plane sits there. (small amounts of friction aside). This should show you that the treadmill has no effect other than speeding up the tires. Now add thrust, the plane moves forward, just like off a runway, but the tires are going twice as fast.
nomatterhow many times you say it, you're still wrong. what is holding the plane in placewhile this treadmill is going? nothig, thus the plane will move backwards. And even for this to work in the original question, the plane would be moving at 1000 mph. [/QB]</font>[/QUOTE]Nothing has to hold the plane in place, put a wagon on a treadmill, it moves back a little because of rolling friction, but not NEARLY as fast as the treadmill rolls. The wheels are effectively in neutral.
If you have your car on a dyno, you get the rollers going and then put the car in nuetral (the planes wheels are always in neutral). Does your car move? No, the wheels just roll, like the planes would on the treadmill.
Add thrust and you go. Period.
1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
1997 Dodge Viper GTS
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment