GOP changes the rules to help it's leader

[LD]

makes me fell all warm and tingly inside to know we have such honest people helping to run the country.
corruption charges...
hmm
sounds like something that would look good on a resume

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/....ap/index.html

[WishIHad$$$]

Damn Bush :mad:

[GrigoryRasputin]

Who cares? This isnt going to prevent an indictment... if the GOP want that criminal ******* as their leader, let them keep him.
Maybe if they get really intertwined with his legal problems, when the **** hits the fan - they'll get caught too.

[T-Punk]

What did that have to do with Bush? i dont think you read the article. I personally dont know that an indictment in its self should cause someone to have to step down but if a committee of people from different parties reviews the facts and find it to be that there is a likelyhood that a law has been broken then the person indicted should have to step down. I also find it sad that it doesnt matter unless it carries a 2yr or longer senctence (if i understood correctly). Basically i agree with you that this is a wrong.

[Blazing_Firebird]

Everytime I see a picture of Bush or anyone affiliated with his administration, I hear the Darth Vader theme (Imperial march) start playing.

Brace down, everyone, we have another long four years.

Not that it would've been any better with Kerry, mind you.

[T-Punk]

No Kerry would have been worse imo but i tend to be a little more conservative. The best candidate was Badnarik but he never stood a chance, poor libertarian party, how i love thee. I think Juliani (i know that has to be spelled wrong) will run next term and i think he stands a good chance of winning too. After how well he did in turning NY around and dealing with 9/11 i think he would be a good presidential candidat... hell, i'd vote for him.

[BLLDOGG]

**** kerry. he isn't president by the choice of america. DEAL WITH IT i am tired of hearing about kerry. :mad: stop humping his leg for atleast 4 MORE YEARS :D

Originally posted by WishIHad$$$:
Damn Bush :mad:

:rolleyes:

[LD]

this wasn't a thread intending to bash Bush
or Kerry for that matter
Anyways, try and keep it on topic huh?

I think is the kind of thing that happens when a party controls too much.
It's kind of a shame that the rules get changed when someone can't conform with them.

does anyone actually agree that lightening the rules is the way to go?
Just out of curiousity

[speedy-v6-camaro]

Originally posted by LD:
It's kind of a shame that the rules get changed when someone can't conform with them.

Yeah...damn blacks for wanting civil rights and women for wanting to vote. For that matter damn slavery. Rules get changed because they need to be for the better (usually) of all people.

[GrigoryRasputin]

they changed their own rules about their own leadership... thats how **** on the Hill works. Dems would do the same thing for Pelosi if she were facing indictment.

Pelosi is the minority leader in the house for anyone who doesnt know politics.

[Dan M]

:rolleyes: