HIV myths

[ka50]

There was a debate here recently about HIV transmission rates in heterosexual vaginal intercorse between a man and a woman. The transmission rates female-to-male (assuming male is healty with no other STD's) are in fact low risk - less than 1% for unprotected vaginal intercourse!

I found this in Journal of American Medical Association:

http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/gca?gca...128&submit.y=7

So, rasputin, what do you say now? Are you going to try to discredit this research?

p.s. choose the playa lifestyle baby! :cool:

[95fbirdkid]

**** the playa lifestyle, from what i read in that last thread you sound like a douche not a playa

[ka50]

Originally posted by 95fbirdkid:
**** the playa lifestyle, from what i read in that last thread you sound like a douche not a playa

Well, just because I wholeheartly disagree with pussified male lifestyle doesn't make me a douche. It just makes me a person that has his own opinion and expresses it without regard of what others might think about the opinion.

On the contrary - you have absoultely no basis to assume whether or not I'm a "player" based on message board discussion. However, I'll leave you alone with your own personal mental deslusions as to what the truth is.

[95fbirdkid]

Well, just because I wholeheartly disagree with pussified male lifestyle doesn't make me a douche. It just makes me a person that has his own opinion and expresses it without regard of what others might think about the opinion.

no actually it does make you a douche. what you call the "pussified male lifestyle" is refered to by most as being respectful and a gentleman. the oposite of that would be an assclown douche.

you have absoultely no basis to assume whether or not I'm a "player" based on message board discussion. However, I'll leave you alone with your own personal mental deslusions as to what the truth is.

your right, you might be a player, but a douche either way

[memphis_raines]

If he was a player he wouldn't have time to research sh*t like this. He'd be out somewhere tappin' dat a$$ :D

[ka50]

You're totally clueless chump my friend.

Knowing how to handle women does not make me disrespectful in any way, shape or form. On the contrary - it makes me a man with healthy sexual drive, that women find so rare these days among the herds of pussified men who are totally clueless on how to relate to women in a way, which will bring women total satisfaction and sudden realization that they are with a real man. The real man that knows how to be with a real woman. They appreciate that a whole lot more than a pussy "gentleman" who's afraid to make sexual advances, because he's too afraid of being seen as pushy, desperate, etc. The real man, on the other hand, understands that women want a man with healthy sexual drive, not a pussy kiss *** boy.

[navyblue2000]

sorry, I'm still not going to do it with a girl who's HIV positive, because 1 in 100 is still 1.

:rolleyes:
get over yourself.

[98Camaro3.8]

:rolleyes:
Grow up.

[GrigoryRasputin]

I dont need to discredit the research - I just need to discredit you.

A 1% chance of getting a life altering/life ending disease is NOT low risk.

Low risk is being responsible with who you sleep with and having good faith they dont have diseases.
Lower risk is being responsible with who you sleep with AND using a condom.
Lowest risk is being monagomous (sp?)
No risk is abstinence.

Make claims on the internet that I get "no ***" if you wish. It doesnt bother me, I do what I do to please myself and to make the girl feel good - not to come on the internet and brag about it.
Sorry buddy, the only one who looks like a pussy here is you.

[GrigoryRasputin]

I do however know your type - youre the type at a party or a bar/club who goes up to tons of girls with a swagger and an attitude that youre hot ****. All my friends that are girls complain about your type. Trust me many of my female friends are some of the most attractive girls you'd ever see - but you wouldnt stand a chance with them. They call you sketchy, desperate, inept. We're in college now - girls arent looking to experiment they know what they want and they dont just want some guy who wants to pick them up so that the guy has a bigger ego.

You may pick a girl up once every night - but you talk to, lets say 50. Thats 1 in 50... not a hell of a lot better than the "low chance" of 1 in 100.
I, on the otherhand, look for girls who arent easily picked up in a club. I look for challenges, and sometimes I fail... and yeah maybe I get a few girls interested in me - but I wont screw anything that walks and has a vag. I have high standards - I might be initially interested in a gorgeous girl but that gorgeous has to have other qualities... one of which isnt too easy, or I'll just lose interest.
This means I might not take a different girl home every night, but of the girls I decide I want to try for, I have a high success rate.

I dont consider myself a "player" I consider myself the average guy. I am friends with beautiful girls, Ive had relationships with beautiful girls and Ive had significantly short relationships with beautiful girls. Trust me, your arrogance only works on nasty sluts - and thats why you need to worry about HIV tons more than I do.

Have a good day.

[MTMike]

Do you honestly think HIV is the only STD out there?

Grow up, go back to Jr. High sex ed, and then post about this again....

[fbirdgt01]

Originally posted by GrigoryRasputin:
I do however know your type - youre the type at a party or a bar/club who goes up to tons of girls with a swagger and an attitude that youre hot ****. All my friends that are girls complain about your type. Trust me many of my female friends are some of the most attractive girls you'd ever see - but you wouldnt stand a chance with them. They call you sketchy, desperate, inept. We're in college now - girls arent looking to experiment they know what they want and they dont just want some guy who wants to pick them up so that the guy has a bigger ego.

You may pick a girl up once every night - but you talk to, lets say 50. Thats 1 in 50... not a hell of a lot better than the "low chance" of 1 in 100.
I, on the otherhand, look for girls who arent easily picked up in a club. I look for challenges, and sometimes I fail... and yeah maybe I get a few girls interested in me - but I wont screw anything that walks and has a vag. I have high standards - I might be initially interested in a gorgeous girl but that gorgeous has to have other qualities... one of which isnt too easy, or I'll just lose interest.
This means I might not take a different girl home every night, but of the girls I decide I want to try for, I have a high success rate.

I dont consider myself a "player" I consider myself the average guy. I am friends with beautiful girls, Ive had relationships with beautiful girls and Ive had significantly short relationships with beautiful girls. Trust me, your arrogance only works on nasty sluts - and thats why you need to worry about HIV tons more than I do.

Have a good day.

This could not have been put any better. 1% is too LARGE a risk for a FATAL disease. If you are not cautious, you are stupid, point blank.

As to Nate saying that people like that attract the nasty slutty girls, it's not necessarily that, it's that they have no self respect. I think people are stupid when it comes to sex these days... especially one's who want to live the "playa" lifestyle :rolleyes:

Did you know 3 out of every 10 people you sleep with have an STD? Think about it. As much I like sex natural...condoms aren't THAT bad, especially if they are decreasing the risk of me DYING just from a little bit of pleasure.

[Question]

Heh, we just had the HIV talk today for the 3rd time I would say. Although Ive heard it many times, it does frighten me. Many people have the attitude that it cant happen to me, I'll be fine, but I dont. This thing is dealdly.