The perfect car GM should make - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The perfect car GM should make

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    mustard?

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by 3.4 [deployed]:
      Slap a turbo on the Solstice when it comes out. Quick convertable, low weight, good power to weight ratio, not an import.
      I like the Solstice [img]graemlins/rock.gif[/img]
      And if I am not mistaken, they are going to make a supercharged version of it.
      <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Blazing_Firebird:
        Nor am I. Too futuristic for me. I swear if they bring back the F-Body and make it look like that, I will burn down every GM plant in the U.S.
        wait about three more years until my dad retires ;)
        1996 Pontiac <a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com\" target=\"_blank\">Firebird</a> <br />Black, 3.8L A4

        Comment


        • #19
          They should do what they did in the late 60's.

          Sell a stripped, basic F-bod type car for a really low MSRP and a gutless, 260hp V8.

          Then have a wealth of GM go fast parts that dealers could install upon delivery of the car if the customer so desired.
          1999 red camaro v6 M5: with a turbo<br />13.52@107.99<br />No, seriously: Who Farted? <br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/600086\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/600086</a>

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
            </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 02PewterBird:
            </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by BirdOfPrey01:
            The F-body should of been 20k brand new for a 98-2002. But the design was so bogus and out dated. The price to build the car was too much, so they cheaped out on important parts.
            The F-Body was $20K brand new in 2002. A decently optioned Z28 could go for under $20K after rebates, and the V6 was even less. </font>[/QUOTE]I don't know where you got those numbers, the Trans Am I wanted was $31k in 2002! And that wasn't fully loaded either! </font>[/QUOTE]i was looking at some 2002 z28s in 2002 and i saw some for $18,500 brand new, fully loaded was like 24.5k.
            Dont call me chief.<br /><br />2001 Camaro Convertible Rs Replica<br />1991 Acura Legend

            Comment


            • #21
              I was about to buy an 02 v6 at classic chevy in Grapevine for 16,200. All the Z28s were like 28,000.
              1999 red camaro v6 M5: with a turbo<br />13.52@107.99<br />No, seriously: Who Farted? <br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/600086\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/600086</a>

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by 97chevycamaro:
                </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
                </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 02PewterBird:
                </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by BirdOfPrey01:
                The F-body should of been 20k brand new for a 98-2002. But the design was so bogus and out dated. The price to build the car was too much, so they cheaped out on important parts.
                The F-Body was $20K brand new in 2002. A decently optioned Z28 could go for under $20K after rebates, and the V6 was even less. </font>[/QUOTE]I don't know where you got those numbers, the Trans Am I wanted was $31k in 2002! And that wasn't fully loaded either! </font>[/QUOTE]i was looking at some 2002 z28s in 2002 and i saw some for $18,500 brand new, fully loaded was like 24.5k. </font>[/QUOTE]It was after I bought my car, but I got a quote on a 2002 Z28 hardtop with an automatic and power everything for $20,750 brand new last March. The rebate was down to $2,000 by then from $3,000 before, and the car had over $1,000 in options so a base Z28 would have been around $18,500 easily.

                I shopped around for two brand new 2002s, so I know pretty well what they went for.
                <a href=\"http://webpages.charter.net/camarov6/Car%20Pics/New/IMG_0085.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Black 2002 Camaro M5</a>-SS takeoff muffler, B&M Ripper, K&N Filter, 35/20% tint, Infinity speakers, Viper alarm, perpetually breaking clutch return spring mod. 15.49@90.15<br /><a href=\"http://webpages.charter.net/camarov6/Car%20Pics/P14.JPG\" target=\"_blank\">Pewter 2002 Firebird M5 (Dad\'s Car)</a>

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
                  </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 02PewterBird:
                  </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by BirdOfPrey01:
                  The F-body should of been 20k brand new for a 98-2002. But the design was so bogus and out dated. The price to build the car was too much, so they cheaped out on important parts.
                  The F-Body was $20K brand new in 2002. A decently optioned Z28 could go for under $20K after rebates, and the V6 was even less. </font>[/QUOTE]I don't know where you got those numbers, the Trans Am I wanted was $31k in 2002! And that wasn't fully loaded either! </font>[/QUOTE]If memory serves, aren't all TA's "fully loaded"?

                  Also, I think the MSRP for Z28's was around 24k and the MSRP for TA's wwas around 30k.

                  That's not including rebates or anything.
                  <a href=\"http://pics.projectpredator.com/thumbnails.php?album=16\" target=\"_blank\">2003 Zinc Yellow Mustang GT</a> 1 of 701<br />ET : TBD<br />But our shenanigans are cheeky and fun! Yeah, and his shenanigans are cruel and tragic. Which... makes t

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    compare the Z/28 to the Formula & SS to the T/A for accurate price comparisons please.
                    The bastardification of Third & Fourth gen cars.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      GTO for me please
                      Your sig is the most important part of your message. Make sure that you list EVERY single thing that you have done to your car so that we can all go \'oooh!\' and \'Ah!\'. Please make your sig consistently longer than anything else you post. Please include your lengthy sig with EVERY single post you make during a reply, even if you only reply with a monosyllable grunt.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by camaro_speedemon:
                        </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
                        </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 02PewterBird:
                        </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by BirdOfPrey01:
                        The F-body should of been 20k brand new for a 98-2002. But the design was so bogus and out dated. The price to build the car was too much, so they cheaped out on important parts.
                        The F-Body was $20K brand new in 2002. A decently optioned Z28 could go for under $20K after rebates, and the V6 was even less. </font>[/QUOTE]I don't know where you got those numbers, the Trans Am I wanted was $31k in 2002! And that wasn't fully loaded either! </font>[/QUOTE]If memory serves, aren't all TA's "fully loaded"?

                        Also, I think the MSRP for Z28's was around 24k and the MSRP for TA's wwas around 30k.

                        That's not including rebates or anything.
                        </font>[/QUOTE]I don't know..
                        But I could pick and choose some stuff [img]tongue.gif[/img]
                        3.4 is right, I forgot its the Trans Am. You might have been able to get a firebird formula for slightly more than the Z28 (aren't they usually a little more expensive).
                        Trans Am was no where near 20k though.. I am guessing the SS wasn't either.
                        <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by BirdOfPrey01:
                          mustard?
                          hahaha spell checker I guess.

                          To me the Supra was a well built/designed car. The turbo model had an engine built like a tank. 700HP with just a turbo upgrade. The in-line 6 is SOOOOO easy to work on and the car could handle the roads with the best of them. I still keep my eyes out for a Supra but when FF came out it became every ricers dream car and they turned it into a clown car like the honda's. When I see one for sale the damn things always have a double wing and ten different colors splashed all over the body. Big ol Folgers coffee fart can hanging off the back.

                          Its a shame what ricers do to cars. Let pray they don't go through a classic car fad and wreck every car from the 60's.
                          White 98 Camaro with t-tops leather and Y87. For more info on mods just ask.<br />1/4=14.9<br />2002 Xterra V6 A4

                          Comment

                          Latest Topics

                          Collapse

                          FORUM SPONSORS

                          Collapse
                          Working...
                          X