Tweet
Originally posted by 1998silverbird:
the new GT it will run around the same..
the new GT it will run around the same..
That was my best time, not my average time everyday. And stangs will run better then 14.4s all day.
-
Not with me driving [img]smile.gif[/img]
That was my best time, not my average time everyday. And stangs will run better then 14.4s all day. -
Go for it, its a great vehicle. I saw a brand new 04 put down 220 to the wheels. Pretty impressive... Sounds like a good increase in performance and you can't beat that new car smell. Plus you'd make a pretty good Mustang owner.
CpComment
-
3 words for ya:
used ls1 formula
As soon as I'm through payin for v6, I'm gonna find me a nice black on black 6sp ls1 formula... there's no car that's better [img]smile.gif[/img]Comment
-
go find yourself a nice 300zx or supra [img]smile.gif[/img]Comment
-
hehe a new stang puts down way more than 220 at the wheels.. what are u reading?~The Guru\'s Guru~<br />1999 Camaro,K&N,!MAF<br />!airsilencer,3.08s,<br />NGK-TR6\'s,Taylor Blue 8mm wires,FRAM,A4,Catco Cat, Magnaflow 3 inch catback,transgo shift kit<br />Waiting: RK sport headers, custom y pipe electric cutout<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/divinejc\" target=\"_blank\">www.cardomain.com/id/divinejc</a>Comment
-
way more.. How so with 260 hp?? The average between 220 and 230 rwhp stock..Originally posted by jc Kyle:
hehe a new stang puts down way more than 220 at the wheels.. what are u reading?Jeff ..
1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold
2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6Comment
-
That saying sucks for guys that eat alot of pussy.Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
So would this be one of those cases when people say, "I am what I eat"? ;)
Bah, yes i know it was dumb but i'm tired and DONT CARE! [img]smile.gif[/img]White 1992 3.1L V6 firebird<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/ssj_trunks\" target=\"_blank\">Here she is</a><br />----------------------------------Comment
-
Two words: SEXY NEON!
They are HOT!
SRT4?Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yetComment
-
Hey and full bolt ons yield you in to the 13s! SOHC GTs are awesome!Originally posted by hou-tex-six:
Go for it, its a great vehicle. I saw a brand new 04 put down 220 to the wheels. Pretty impressive... Sounds like a good increase in performance and you can't beat that new car smell. Plus you'd make a pretty good Mustang owner.
Cp
Buy a used Mach 1So if your loud mouths shaking and your consoles vibrating<br />bald 17 inch ZR1s got you Trans Am skatingComment
-
Please don't get a plain GT. Everyone has one and they are slow (atleast the majority on the streets).
Step up, spend a little bit more, and get a rare one if you must leep to the darkside.
I admit, Cobras are some good squishy.
Or you can be fast NA and get an LS1... ;)2002 NBM Firehawk #312 | <a href=\"http://hawk.visionsconnect.com\" target=\"_blank\">hawk.visionsconnect.com</a>Comment
-
hm.. 220 seems extremely low.. and i thought the newer ones had more than 260hp~The Guru\'s Guru~<br />1999 Camaro,K&N,!MAF<br />!airsilencer,3.08s,<br />NGK-TR6\'s,Taylor Blue 8mm wires,FRAM,A4,Catco Cat, Magnaflow 3 inch catback,transgo shift kit<br />Waiting: RK sport headers, custom y pipe electric cutout<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/divinejc\" target=\"_blank\">www.cardomain.com/id/divinejc</a>Comment
-
Flywheel perhaps.Originally posted by jc Kyle:
hm.. 220 seems extremely low.. and i thought the newer ones had more than 260hp
220RWHP bone stock 2004 GT... saw it two months ago.Comment
-
My old roomate from college ran hsi new 04 GT (5 speed) at teh track against me, it was bone stock and so was mine, down to paper filters [img]smile.gif[/img]
me: 13.6 @ 104 2.2 60 ft
him: 15.3 @ 98 2.4 60 ft that was his best time LOL.Comment
-
I'm not reading anything jerky, it dynoed about 5 feet in front of me... ppreciate the input though, back to Motor trend for you.Originally posted by jc Kyle:
hehe a new stang puts down way more than 220 at the wheels.. what are u reading?
CpComment
-
Huh?
Are you guys talking about autos or something, I have drivine an auto and a 5-speed, auto felt faster then me but jsut barely... 5-speed would have wasted me no problem.
As for the times you saw, a guy at the track asked me and shane what to do since he has never been to the track and he just bought this stang GT and had never ran it. He pulled a 14.6, spinning halfway down the track on like his 3rd run ever...
Decently driven easy low 14s, with people in the high 13s stock. Just slightly slower then a lt1 stock for stock.
And I half know have talked to a guy at the track numerous times runs consistant low 13s with a best of a 13.0 with full intake exhaust, and gears. Good enough for me...
I know I won't be "king of the hill" never will be in the game of racing cars... There are people who always have more money, and anyways I have nothing to prove. I don't get cars to try and prove I am "better". I never woudl have gotten v6s then. Sorry if I woudl rather have a new car for $18k then a newest 2-3 year old used one that likely has 30k on the odometer for the same price. With financing and such, I woudl be paying for an ls1 till ~80-90k. If a bank would let me, yeah not a good idea. And I really don't want ot put any more money down on a car, I have it but I am not putting into putting every cent I have into a car, I have other things in life I am making money towards.
In one way or another I have owned an f-body the entire time I have had a driver's license, heck got my first f-body when I was 15.
Another thing to anyone who has bashed it... have you ever driven a mustang yet?
As for SRT-4, I really looked at them but I prefer a nice RWD car with midrange and manual tranny.Comment
Comment