Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Well, 260hp is only 60hp more than V6 f-body... you'll get tired of it quickly. To me, even LS1 v8 with ram-air package feels slow now (driven one a few times)...
it all depends what you want. I, personally, want a fast car that looks like a true SPORTS CAR, not like a 2-dr passenger coupe...
Originally posted by hawgs: Maybe I missed it somewhere... but I didnt see anyone bashing the GTs, merely expressing facts (220RWHP & 15.3s) and opinions (which you asked for)
I guess your right...
200hp 230ft/lbs torque cars run low 15s.
260hp, 305ft/lbs torque cars run 15.3s
Thanks Hawgs as usual your posts and the rest of sick sixx posts are useful and enlightening as usual [img]smile.gif[/img] .
Tiago said 15.3, not me... and he was driving next to the guy and it is his good friend from college, I do not think he is lying.
I was 5 feet away from a 2004 GT that dyno'ed 220RWHP bone stock. I can reference you to the thread on LS1tech.com where HE posted it if you wish.
Are these not facts? Am I lying? Am I talking about stuff that didn't happen to make Mustangs look bad? You are correct... I am right. Don't start with me Eric.
Originally posted by hawgs: Tiago said 15.3... he was driving next to the guy and it is his good friend from college, I do not think he is lying.
I was 5 feet away from a 2004 GT that dyno'ed 220RWHP bone stock. I can reference you to the thread on LS1tech.com where HE posted it if you wish.
Are these not facts? Am I lying? Am I talking about stuff that didn't happen to make Mustangs look bad? You are correct... I am right. Don't start with me Eric.
I just said thanks for the help... way to accept a compliment...
Do you have to turn every post of mine into a battle?
Originally posted by hawgs: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by MustangEater8251: I guess your right...
200hp 230ft/lbs torque cars run low 15s.
260hp, 305ft/lbs torque cars run 15.3s
It does not take a fool to see what you meant when you said that, do not play off your loaded comments as compliments. </font>[/QUOTE]I am just stating the facts you posted and what is generally known amoung the v6 community...
Honestly why do you post in my posts... I avoid yours for the most part?
No one likes our debates(well some do :D ) but they get old, piss off the admin and board members. So please go get on someone elses nuts. Thank You...
Originally posted by Tiago: its obvious it can run better then he drove it but still 98 mph vs 104 and mine is "only" a 99 heh
hehe well I know ls1s are faster thats a given. But I am not looking at getting an ls1 [img]smile.gif[/img] Believe me I have looked into them and researched them.
Well it seems you know your stuff about stangs, looks like a good fit for you. If you have the means to get in a new car with more performance, then do it. Go get a good deal on an 04 before they are gone. I like the "dark shadow gray" color. Nothing wrong with 220RWHP by the way.
Originally posted by hawgs: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ABH: I'm looking at Mustangs at the moment. I will look at the 2005 model when the Ford site has them.
Or maybe a used XK8. Depends on the next few months.
Yeah... lots of people debate between those two cars, theyre so gosh darn similar. </font>[/QUOTE]I could just buy both. Kills your debate.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment