looking at the darkside again :) - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

looking at the darkside again :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Well, 260hp is only 60hp more than V6 f-body... you'll get tired of it quickly. To me, even LS1 v8 with ram-air package feels slow now (driven one a few times)...

    it all depends what you want. I, personally, want a fast car that looks like a true SPORTS CAR, not like a 2-dr passenger coupe...

    Comment


    • #32
      I'm looking at Mustangs at the moment. I will look at the 2005 model when the Ford site has them.

      Or maybe a used XK8. Depends on the next few months.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by ABH:
        I'm looking at Mustangs at the moment. I will look at the 2005 model when the Ford site has them.

        Or maybe a used XK8. Depends on the next few months.
        Yeah... lots of people debate between those two cars, theyre so gosh darn similar.

        Comment


        • #34
          Maybe I missed it somewhere... but I didnt see anyone bashing the GTs, merely expressing facts (220RWHP & 15.3s) and opinions (which you asked for)

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by hawgs:
            Maybe I missed it somewhere... but I didnt see anyone bashing the GTs, merely expressing facts (220RWHP & 15.3s) and opinions (which you asked for)
            I guess your right...

            200hp 230ft/lbs torque cars run low 15s.

            260hp, 305ft/lbs torque cars run 15.3s

            Thanks Hawgs as usual your posts and the rest of sick sixx posts are useful and enlightening as usual [img]smile.gif[/img] .

            Comment


            • #36
              Tiago said 15.3, not me... and he was driving next to the guy and it is his good friend from college, I do not think he is lying.

              I was 5 feet away from a 2004 GT that dyno'ed 220RWHP bone stock. I can reference you to the thread on LS1tech.com where HE posted it if you wish.

              Are these not facts? Am I lying? Am I talking about stuff that didn't happen to make Mustangs look bad? You are correct... I am right. Don't start with me Eric.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by hawgs:
                Tiago said 15.3... he was driving next to the guy and it is his good friend from college, I do not think he is lying.

                I was 5 feet away from a 2004 GT that dyno'ed 220RWHP bone stock. I can reference you to the thread on LS1tech.com where HE posted it if you wish.

                Are these not facts? Am I lying? Am I talking about stuff that didn't happen to make Mustangs look bad? You are correct... I am right. Don't start with me Eric.
                I just said thanks for the help... way to accept a compliment...

                Do you have to turn every post of mine into a battle?

                And I'll be careful not to "start with you" :eek:

                [ June 25, 2004, 04:28 PM: Message edited by: MustangEater8251 ]

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by MustangEater8251:
                  I guess your right...

                  200hp 230ft/lbs torque cars run low 15s.

                  260hp, 305ft/lbs torque cars run 15.3s
                  It does not take a fool to see what you meant when you said that, do not play off your loaded comments as compliments.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by hawgs:
                    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by MustangEater8251:
                    I guess your right...

                    200hp 230ft/lbs torque cars run low 15s.

                    260hp, 305ft/lbs torque cars run 15.3s
                    It does not take a fool to see what you meant when you said that, do not play off your loaded comments as compliments. </font>[/QUOTE]I am just stating the facts you posted and what is generally known amoung the v6 community...

                    Honestly why do you post in my posts... I avoid yours for the most part?

                    No one likes our debates(well some do :D ) but they get old, piss off the admin and board members. So please go get on someone elses nuts. Thank You...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      its obvious it can run better then he drove it but still 98 mph vs 104 and mine is "only" a 99 heh

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Tiago:
                        its obvious it can run better then he drove it but still 98 mph vs 104 and mine is "only" a 99 heh
                        hehe well I know ls1s are faster thats a given. But I am not looking at getting an ls1 [img]smile.gif[/img] Believe me I have looked into them and researched them.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Well it seems you know your stuff about stangs, looks like a good fit for you. If you have the means to get in a new car with more performance, then do it. Go get a good deal on an 04 before they are gone. I like the "dark shadow gray" color. Nothing wrong with 220RWHP by the way.

                          Cp

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            his car is nice nethertheless. :D

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by hawgs:
                              </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ABH:
                              I'm looking at Mustangs at the moment. I will look at the 2005 model when the Ford site has them.

                              Or maybe a used XK8. Depends on the next few months.
                              Yeah... lots of people debate between those two cars, theyre so gosh darn similar. </font>[/QUOTE]I could just buy both. Kills your debate.

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              There are no results that meet this criteria.

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X