SRT-4 - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SRT-4

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I am amazed by the driveline in the SRT-4, I just don't care for sedans. If it was a coupe, I would consider thinking about looking into the possiblities of maybe becoming interested in them.
    1999 red camaro v6 M5: with a turbo<br />13.52@107.99<br />No, seriously: Who Farted? <br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/600086\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/600086</a>

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by MTMike:
      There's so much more to a car than 1/4 mile times.

      Get what will make YOU happy. In MY opinion, they're hella fast little NEONS. But you can strap a jet engine to the roof of a pinto and all you have is a fast pinto; not an amazing car.

      I know a guy with one that would probably show my Z28 his ugly taillights, but he has to look at this in his garage every night, and I get to look at this. Just keep that in mind.
      X2
      I solemnly swear I am up to no good.

      2008 Saturn Sky Red Line - Midnight Blue

      Pewter Mafia - 2000 Firebird - SOLD
      CENTRAL FLORIDA KNIGHTS!!!!!!!
      FLORIDA STATE SEMINOLES !!!!!!!

      Comment


      • #33
        there's here in italy, and i would get one for a daily driver if it wasn't for the god awful wing on the back
        www.turbov6camaro.com
        1997 3800 Series II Camaro
        4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
        7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
        11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

        Comment


        • #34
          I've seen a SRT-4 without the wing, looks great. Let's see if I can dig up the photo...

          http://img47.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img47...berimages5.jpg
          Check out my stable of supercharged W-Bodies <a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/vbgarage.php?do=view&id=136\" target=\"_blank\">HERE</a><br /><b>\'97 Pontiac GP GTP Coupe</b><br /><b>\'98 Regal GS | L67 3800 Series II</b>

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by L32Projekt:
            I've seen a SRT-4 without the wing, looks great. Let's see if I can dig up the photo...

            http://img47.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img47...berimages5.jpg
            see that looks fine...... nonw if they could make it one color
            www.turbov6camaro.com
            1997 3800 Series II Camaro
            4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
            7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
            11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

            Comment


            • #36
              I'm pretty sure you can paint over Carbon-Fiber. All silver, like my current Neon, baby! [img]tongue.gif[/img]
              Check out my stable of supercharged W-Bodies <a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/vbgarage.php?do=view&id=136\" target=\"_blank\">HERE</a><br /><b>\'97 Pontiac GP GTP Coupe</b><br /><b>\'98 Regal GS | L67 3800 Series II</b>

              Comment


              • #37
                Dont do it man, get an LS1.

                2000 Pewter Pontiac Transam 360rwhp, 370ftlbs
                1998 Sport Gold Metallic Chevrolet Camaro *SOLD*
                1974 Silver Chevrolet BIG BLOCK Corvette

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by epic:
                  It's your money. Your choice.

                  My opinion...It's a frickin neon. You realize this. It's a NEON. Sure, it performs really well for what it is. However, it's a NEON.

                  And does anyone want to make a bet that James comes in here and mentions a type of "sexyness". :mad:
                  Biggest.. Misconception.. evAR!


                  Tell me one thing they have in common with one-another besides looks.

                  Engine? Nope, not even close.
                  Tranny? Nope..
                  Suspension? Try again.
                  Interior? HA!
                  Wheels? Nope.
                  Chassis? They're realted, but SRT-4 is stiffened


                  ooo! ooo! I know.. Its FWD, so they're related!

                  [img]graemlins/twak.gif[/img] Like I said, biggest misconception ever.
                  Mustangs.. Come to the darkside...<br /><br />The dark side is the path to the shadow of greed. =D

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    I feel obligated to say get an LS1, but I know that the srt-4 is alot more practical of a car.

                    One thing it has going for it is its a dodge. Dodge = Mopar. Mopar = Factory built, dealer installable, mods that dont void warrenty.


                    I'd say if you like the looks of it its a mighty fine car to have.
                    RedlineVSix

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by KBeezy:
                      [img]graemlins/twak.gif[/img] Like I said, biggest misconception ever.
                      Hey, smart guy. Make this same argument over at LS1tech. I can tell you two things that will happen.

                      First, you will be laughed at.

                      Second, everytime you type in SRT-4, LS1tech's infrastructure will change that to NeonNeonNeon.

                      Case closed. If you're looking for balls to the wall power, don't get an SRT-4, because you'll be craving for much, much more.
                      2002 NBM Firehawk #312 | <a href=\"http://hawk.visionsconnect.com\" target=\"_blank\">hawk.visionsconnect.com</a>

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Hmm, last I checked a car that weighs around 2600lbs and has an output of 300-someodd, plus HP (depending on what you plan on doing with it) isn't shabby at all. But what do I know, I drive an old man's car. :D
                        Check out my stable of supercharged W-Bodies <a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/vbgarage.php?do=view&id=136\" target=\"_blank\">HERE</a><br /><b>\'97 Pontiac GP GTP Coupe</b><br /><b>\'98 Regal GS | L67 3800 Series II</b>

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by epic:
                          </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by KBeezy:
                          [img]graemlins/twak.gif[/img] Like I said, biggest misconception ever.
                          Hey, smart guy. Make this same argument over at LS1tech. I can tell you two things that will happen.

                          First, you will be laughed at.

                          Second, everytime you type in SRT-4, LS1tech's infrastructure will change that to NeonNeonNeon.

                          Case closed. If you're looking for balls to the wall power, don't get an SRT-4, because you'll be craving for much, much more.
                          </font>[/QUOTE]and we all know that if the guys over at LS1tech dont like somthing it has to be ****ty :rolleyes:
                          RedlineVSix

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            [img]graemlins/bowdown.gif[/img] SRT-4

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by KBeezy:
                              </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by epic:
                              It's your money. Your choice.

                              My opinion...It's a frickin neon. You realize this. It's a NEON. Sure, it performs really well for what it is. However, it's a NEON.

                              And does anyone want to make a bet that James comes in here and mentions a type of "sexyness". :mad:
                              Biggest.. Misconception.. evAR!


                              Tell me one thing they have in common with one-another besides looks.
                              </font>[/QUOTE]That is a very big similarity right there [img]smile.gif[/img] Which is probably why people say it is a fast neon, because it looks exactly like a neon with a hood scoop and wing [img]smile.gif[/img]
                              <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I think they are nice cars.

                                I personally don't like neons, I think they are disposable, but I don't consider the SRT-4 to be in the same catergory at all.

                                The engine is FAR superior to any other neon, it it built strong for boost. Everything on the car is better than a regular neon.

                                It is a very quick car, especially for a 4 cylinder. It is very upgradable also, as mentioned.

                                The only thing holding me back is the looks. The only thing I like is the intercooler on the front.

                                I say buy it if you like it. I know a few LS1 and Lt1 guys who have bought them and love them.
                                1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
                                1997 Dodge Viper GTS

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                FORUM SPONSORS

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X