they still have matter: the particles they are accelerating. it's not really something out of nothing. i don't believe it's possible to simulate conditions before there was matter.
a black hole so small that it wasn't really a black hole would have to be infinitely miniscule, or not a black hole at all. by definition, it would have to be so dense that light's velocity would not be sufficient to break itself from the object's gravitational field.
i'm not sure how it would suck in on itself, since a black "hole" is just extremely dense matter.
i think what you are thinking of are the electron only "black holes"... in other words, only electrons are trapped by the object's gravity, not light or matter.
i know hawking theorized that black holes can evaporate if they don't absorb an appreciable amount of matter, but i don't see why they would have appetites. i'm sure i should read the rest of that theory.
with the frequency we have these discussions, we need to make a quantum physics section... [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]
a black hole so small that it wasn't really a black hole would have to be infinitely miniscule, or not a black hole at all. by definition, it would have to be so dense that light's velocity would not be sufficient to break itself from the object's gravitational field.
i'm not sure how it would suck in on itself, since a black "hole" is just extremely dense matter.
i think what you are thinking of are the electron only "black holes"... in other words, only electrons are trapped by the object's gravity, not light or matter.
i know hawking theorized that black holes can evaporate if they don't absorb an appreciable amount of matter, but i don't see why they would have appetites. i'm sure i should read the rest of that theory.
with the frequency we have these discussions, we need to make a quantum physics section... [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]
Comment