2005 V6 Stang - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2005 V6 Stang

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fbody3400:
    The GTs are hitting sub 5 second 0 to 60s... Thats pretty good for a $25000 car.
    MSRP is $25,670. Dealership will be a few thousand higher. </font>[/QUOTE]they're going for MSRP here
    RedlineVSix

    Comment


    • #17
      The GT is the cheapest 300hp car you can buy
      <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/ride/857214\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/ride/857214</a>

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by silverV6firebird:
        The GT is the cheapest 300hp car you can buy
        the LS1 is still cheaper :D

        Comment


        • #19
          Not if it is in a 2004 GTO. Plus the fact that the LS1 requires premium. My 300hp GT uses the same octane as my 200hp 97 Camaro.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
            </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fbody3400:
            The GTs are hitting sub 5 second 0 to 60s... Thats pretty good for a $25000 car.
            MSRP is $25,670. Dealership will be a few thousand higher. </font>[/QUOTE]My friend got close to a thouand off MSRP on his GT ordered back in October, but his mom bought one too.

            Oh, he ran a 13.92@102 bone stock on street tires with almost no driving experience with a 5-speed on his first trip to a not so great track while launching from idle.
            <a href=\"http://webpages.charter.net/camarov6/Car%20Pics/New/IMG_0085.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Black 2002 Camaro M5</a>-SS takeoff muffler, B&M Ripper, K&N Filter, 35/20% tint, Infinity speakers, Viper alarm, perpetually breaking clutch return spring mod. 15.49@90.15<br /><a href=\"http://webpages.charter.net/camarov6/Car%20Pics/P14.JPG\" target=\"_blank\">Pewter 2002 Firebird M5 (Dad\'s Car)</a>

            Comment


            • #21
              Based Soley on HP and Weight the new v6 mustang is very comprable to 3.8 Fbodies.
              Cardomain

              Comment


              • #22
                ^ x2
                Dave:
                00 Supercharged Camaro - RIP
                97 Turbo Camaro - Sold

                Comment


                • #23
                  I got news for you. We are seriously outdated. Our engine and everything for that matter has been the same since mid 1995. So V6 Stangs are just playing catch up.

                  Mustangs exterior on the scale of 1-10 is about a 7. Interior looks good on the magazine but looks bad in person. I give that one a 4.

                  I'm sure if the F-body V6 was still around we would be getting the new 3.9 engine that has 240 hp.

                  1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    F-bodies have always over-powered and out-run the mustangs of the same year whether it be the V6 or the V8's. If we had a new Fbody it would rip a hole in the new mustangs. Our dated T/A's still pull on the new V8 stangs.
                    Shawn<br />2002 Silver W68 Firebird

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Mighty Thor:
                      I got news for you. We are seriously outdated. Our engine and everything for that matter has been the same since mid 1995. So V6 Stangs are just playing catch up.
                      The LS7 is a Pushrod, 2-valve motor making 500hp and doesn't have to pay the gas guzzler tax. We are not outdated [img]smile.gif[/img]

                      And Those people who get them for under MSRP are lucky! :eek:
                      Around here they jack the prices up..
                      <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
                        </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mighty Thor:
                        I got news for you. We are seriously outdated. Our engine and everything for that matter has been the same since mid 1995. So V6 Stangs are just playing catch up.
                        The LS7 is a Pushrod, 2-valve motor making 500hp and doesn't have to pay the gas guzzler tax. We are not outdated [img]smile.gif[/img]

                        And Those people who get them for under MSRP are lucky! :eek:
                        Around here they jack the prices up..
                        </font>[/QUOTE]he was talking about v6 fbodies
                        RedlineVSix

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          It would be great if in a year or two they came out with something like the Y87 option (v8 brakes, torsen diff).

                          BTW. The 60 V6 looks like it leaves room for a T25 on each side [img]smile.gif[/img] .

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by 95fbirdkid:
                            </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 95Batmobile:
                            </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mighty Thor:
                            I got news for you. We are seriously outdated. Our engine and everything for that matter has been the same since mid 1995. So V6 Stangs are just playing catch up.
                            The LS7 is a Pushrod, 2-valve motor making 500hp and doesn't have to pay the gas guzzler tax. We are not outdated [img]smile.gif[/img]

                            And Those people who get them for under MSRP are lucky! :eek:
                            Around here they jack the prices up..
                            </font>[/QUOTE]he was talking about v6 fbodies
                            </font>[/QUOTE]I know, and V6 f-bodies are also pushrod, 2-valve motors [img]smile.gif[/img] I was making the comparison of what they're capable of.
                            <b><a href=\"http://members.cox.net/95batmobile/d86f.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Sinister Six©</b></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.sounddomain.com/id/95batmobile\" target=\"_blank\">My \'95 Bird</a><br />I am not afraid of storms, for I am learning how to sail my ship.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              one of the links I posted in the drag racing section, had one running low 15s, looked stock.
                              -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                This 2005 V6s look quick. They are running the same times the V8s autos ran a few years ago. I only ever see the times for the autos, none of the magazines ever test the manual. I really dont care for the new mustangs retro styling, but their drivetrains are looking good. [img]smile.gif[/img]
                                92 S10 3800 A4(96)<br />1/4: 14.374 @ 92.25 w/ 1.976 60\'<br />Turbo and 12\'s Coming Soon!

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                FORUM SPONSORS

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X