Checkout Hyundai new 3.8 V6 engine - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Checkout Hyundai new 3.8 V6 engine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Checkout Hyundai new 3.8 V6 engine

    http://www.hyundaiusa.com/vehicle/av...oon/azera.aspx

    OK, now I have to say GM suck :D

    3.9 240 hp from GM is looking dull now.

    I've own 3 Hyundai: Accent, Sonata and right now '03 Santa Fe.

    Hyundai has not disappointed me at all. I love their no BS warranty. I've only used it once so far.

    [ October 26, 2005, 02:17 AM: Message edited by: Mighty Thor ]

    1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

  • #2
    Definitely has enough airbags. Half the price of the car must be for the airbag system. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
    Matt
    1998 Mystic Teal Camaro M5
    Whisper Lid, Pacesetter Headers, Catco Cat, Dynomax Super Turbo, B&M Shifter, BMR STB, LSD, P&P Intakes, GT2 Cam, Comp OE Lifters, 1.7 Roller Rockers, Pushrods, SSM Heads, DHP PowrTuner.

    Comment


    • #3
      oh good, now they can put it in one of their rear wheel drive sports cars that i care about [img]tongue.gif[/img]

      96 V6 A4 Camaro and 99 Z28 A4 Camaro
      Visit My F-Body Page

      Comment


      • #4
        Hyundai's suck. They're far below GM in build quality.

        Besides, GM is pushing 260HP out of their 3.8 to.
        <a href=\"http://pics.projectpredator.com/thumbnails.php?album=16\" target=\"_blank\">2003 Zinc Yellow Mustang GT</a> 1 of 701<br />ET : TBD<br />But our shenanigans are cheeky and fun! Yeah, and his shenanigans are cruel and tragic. Which... makes t

        Comment


        • #5
          im impressed.

          current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it

          Follow me!
          http://www.twitch.tv/optimusprymrib
          Or this

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by camaro_speedemon:
            Hyundai's suck. They're far below GM in build quality.
            The early model year of Hyundai were terrible, but the newer ones are nice.

            The Accent and Sonata one I use to own was way better than the Civic and Sentra I use to have. I'm not even going to mention Cavalier.

            It's actually more car for what I paid for.

            I just read Popular Science. GM is experimenting with Variable Timing on the 3.9. In a year or so, this engine might actually get more HP with better fuel economy.

            1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Mighty Thor:
              </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by camaro_speedemon:
              Hyundai's suck. They're far below GM in build quality.
              The early model year of Hyundai were terrible, but the newer ones are nice.

              The Accent and Sonata one I use to own was way better than the Civic and Sentra I use to have. I'm not even going to mention Cavalier.

              It's actually more car for what I paid for.

              I just read Popular Science. GM is experimenting with Variable Timing on the 3.9. In a year or so, this engine might actually get more HP with better fuel economy.
              </font>[/QUOTE]I think the current CTS V6 has some kind of VVT. Or maybe they havent used that motor yet, and we're thinking of the same motor.
              <a href=\"http://pics.projectpredator.com/thumbnails.php?album=16\" target=\"_blank\">2003 Zinc Yellow Mustang GT</a> 1 of 701<br />ET : TBD<br />But our shenanigans are cheeky and fun! Yeah, and his shenanigans are cruel and tragic. Which... makes t

              Comment


              • #8
                Besides, GM is pushing 260HP out of their 3.8 to.
                Did I get ripped off or something when I bought my car? my 3.8 only puts out 200hp [img]tongue.gif[/img]
                <b><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2288859\" target=\"_blank\">1999 Mustang GT(Car Domain)</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2123740\" target=\"_blank\">1998 Pontiac Firebird(Car Domain) *SOLD*</a></b> <br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.camarov6.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=9;t=000902\" target=\"_blank\"><b>PA</b> - Maple Grove Test\'N\'Tune <i>April 15th</i></a>

                Comment


                • #9
                  uhh, GM has had their own version of VVT for quite some time. Ever heard of the Pontiac Vibe by any chance? Same damn thing as the Toyota Matrix w/ VVT.


                  Besides, yes, the Cadillac DOHC V6 &gt; Hyundai


                  Cadillac DOHC 2.8 V6 has 200hp, the Cadillac 3.6 has 255... And both have torque near the peak HP #s [img]smile.gif[/img]
                  Mustangs.. Come to the darkside...<br /><br />The dark side is the path to the shadow of greed. =D

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Matt G:
                    </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Besides, GM is pushing 260HP out of their 3.8 to.
                    Did I get ripped off or something when I bought my car? my 3.8 only puts out 200hp [img]tongue.gif[/img] </font>[/QUOTE]considering your motor was designed in the early 90s when it was still cool to put fuel injection on the side of a car [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]

                    [ October 26, 2005, 09:44 PM: Message edited by: BLLDOGG ]
                    2000 3.8 A4 Pewter Camaro

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by KBeezy:
                      uhh, GM has had their own version of VVT for quite some time. Ever heard of the Pontiac Vibe by any chance? Same damn thing as the Toyota Matrix w/ VVT.
                      And the same engine that Toyota designed. The Vibe uses the Toyota engine that I think originally debuted in the 2000 Celica.
                      <a href=\"http://webpages.charter.net/camarov6/Car%20Pics/New/IMG_0085.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">Black 2002 Camaro M5</a>-SS takeoff muffler, B&M Ripper, K&N Filter, 35/20% tint, Infinity speakers, Viper alarm, perpetually breaking clutch return spring mod. 15.49@90.15<br /><a href=\"http://webpages.charter.net/camarov6/Car%20Pics/P14.JPG\" target=\"_blank\">Pewter 2002 Firebird M5 (Dad\'s Car)</a>

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by BLLDOGG:
                        </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Matt G:
                        </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Besides, GM is pushing 260HP out of their 3.8 to.
                        Did I get ripped off or something when I bought my car? my 3.8 only puts out 200hp [img]tongue.gif[/img] </font>[/QUOTE]considering your motor was designed in the early 90s when it was still cool to put fuel injection on the side of a car [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] </font>[/QUOTE]Exactly, its alittle over 10 years now since it was an option in '95 for the F-bodies. Its funny people still compare cars to Camaros and Trans Ams etc.... with the LS1 that was made in freakin '97 (Vette) and they still lose to it [img]smile.gif[/img]

                        Plus GM has a 242-horsepower 3.9L V6 engine
                        \'98 z28<br /> <a href=\"http://photobucket.com/albums/a245/GreatSave9/?start=all\" target=\"_blank\">http://photobucket.com/albums/a245/GreatSave9/?start=all</a>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hey, that's a pretty nice car! :cool:
                          2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
                          1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
                          2011 Cadillac CTS-V
                          2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
                          2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            It's simple really. All these car makers are doing to raise the hp on these smaller engines is jacking up the compression ratio to 10.0:1 + That's the main thing. Then they have to use Premium fuel though.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              ehh... my friend had a '00 hyundai, it consumed the entire oil pan of oil between oil changes, no "major" leaks. Guess its ok though it only had like 55k on it.
                              -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X