Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GM's inside news; doesn't look like the 3.8 will be around for long.
Originally posted by Fbody3400: sounds to me as if the 60* will be better, 240 > 200. So in turn, 60* > 90. Face it, its gone, time keeps going, crappy f-bodies dont.
60 degree has always been a better architecture for a V6, if everything else is equal.
Originally posted by HAZ-Matt: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fbody3400: sounds to me as if the 60* will be better, 240 > 200. So in turn, 60* > 90. Face it, its gone, time keeps going, crappy f-bodies dont.
60 degree has always been a better architecture for a V6, if everything else is equal. </font>[/QUOTE]Well 60* does give an even firing sequence instead of the odd one from 90* but I don't think it's better. Performance wise it isn't but for fuel economy it is.
Originally posted by HAZ-Matt: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fbody3400: sounds to me as if the 60* will be better, 240 > 200. So in turn, 60* > 90. Face it, its gone, time keeps going, crappy f-bodies dont.
60 degree has always been a better architecture for a V6, if everything else is equal. </font>[/QUOTE]Sounds better too.
Turbocharged and intercooled.<br />17psi(oops), stock fuel pump, no FMU<br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/phoenix64\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/id/phoenix64</a> <br />Video: <a href=\"ftp://ftp.pfabrication.com\" target=\"_blank\">ftp://ftp.pfabrication.com</a> Assorted car ****: TurboCamaroFull.
Originally posted by 1DangerousV6: eh..by 2008 my car will be a decade old
My car turned 10 years old...10 years and the head gasket just went out and no other major problems, man I love my car. [img]graemlins/rock.gif[/img]
<b><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/onebad9d5\" target=\"_blank\">1995 Red 3.4L Camaro</a><br /></b><br />Dont laugh if you see me pushing, no reverse, tranny needs rebuild.
^ happy 10th anniversary! lol ..yeah i've had mine for just about 4 years now..its got about 90K on it..only thing i've replaced (besides mods done on purpose) is the water pump and alternator..not bad for dragging the car [img]smile.gif[/img]
Originally posted by Trunks: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by kamarozrule: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by chadder: even if the camaro isnt on the f-body platform anymore, im still gonna call it an F-BODY, cause ZETA sounds retarted.
Haha Z-body [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] </font>[/QUOTE]heh, sounds french..i dont want no damn frenchy car [img]smile.gif[/img] (yes i know the fbodies were made in canada [img]tongue.gif[/img] ) </font>[/QUOTE]You should know,Canada rocks buddy
[img]graemlins/rock.gif[/img] well western Canada that is ;)
$Ryan$<br />95 3400 Teal Green FireBird M5<br />Mods: see link <a href=\"http://lowrider.cardomain.com/id/mystical420\" target=\"_blank\">http://lowrider.cardomain.com/id/mystical420</a> <br />1986 Gold Mazda B2000 ROTIP :)<br />*New*74 Moded 350 Chevy Pickup
if they up the displacement in the 60* i wouldnt mind them but i dont see them getting up over 3.6.
2001 Arctic White Firebird With Black Drop Top<br /><br />3:42 Gears<br />Zexel LSD<br />BMR upper A-Arms<br />Trans Am exhaust with 3\" I-pipe and cutout<br />Modified intake<br />Mecham Hood<br />Trans Go shift kit<br />Making rear control arms and panhard
There isnt anything wrong with the 3.4's, ya, they were a bit weaker, but they can pick up on it, the 60* engines are like that nerd in highschool, everyone picks on them, then 10 years down the road at the reunion they are rich and kick everyone's a**
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment