3kgt VR4 - LT1 - High milage LS1 - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

3kgt VR4 - LT1 - High milage LS1

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 3kgt VR4 - LT1 - High milage LS1

    Take ur pick and tell me why.....this is for a college student in FL!
    33
    Mitsubishi 3000gt Vr4 Twin Turbo V6 DOHC AWD
    18.18%
    6
    Chevy Camaro Lt1 V8
    81.82%
    27
    Chevy Camaro Ls1 V8 (Higher Milage)
    0.00%
    0
    ---

  • #2
    Gotta say the LS1...if something craps out....just replace it. You run 13's easy...unless you suck at the driver mod.

    Comment


    • #3
      LS1 obviously. Powerful, strong motor (besides piston slap), lots of mods, well known motor.

      LT1s are old, high milage, and its hard to find low miles and a good body.

      VR4s are expensive and higher milage than any of the cars I bet. My friend loves them and we went searching for them. People say they retain their value, but thats only because they cost about $40-45k brand new back in the days 94-99. So you'll find one with like 150k miles going for $15k still. Also they were pretty limited production, they're not a car you'll find daily. My friend picked up a '92 VR4 in really bad shape for $3k, but is putting about $10k of work back into the tranny, engine and body.

      But also watch out for insurance costs.
      \'98 z28<br /> <a href=\"http://photobucket.com/albums/a245/GreatSave9/?start=all\" target=\"_blank\">http://photobucket.com/albums/a245/GreatSave9/?start=all</a>

      Comment


      • #4
        LS1 for sure. My buddy has a dodge stealth R/T TT and its the same thing as a VR4 and that thing costs a lot to fix. Dont those things weigh a **** load too? Insurance will be bad on all those cars tho.
        2003 Chrome Silver Nissan 350z 6 Speed<br /><br />2001 Bright Rally Red Camaro 3800 M5-----SOLD but missed

        Comment


        • #5
          LS1 for sure... the 3000GT will be a nightmare.


          The Lt1, newest one you will buy is gonna be 8 years old already. And honestly seems like the ls1 is a little cheaper to maintain(well except for brakes)
          -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

          Comment


          • #6
            LT1- lower insurance than a ls1 and still a blast to drive.

            current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it

            Follow me!
            http://www.twitch.tv/optimusprymrib
            Or this

            Comment


            • #7
              vr4 is a quick car but read up on them, not very dependable...... most need a complete rebuild by 60k

              Comment


              • #8
                LS1 for sure

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by 01MaroIL:
                  My buddy has a dodge stealth R/T TT and its the same thing as a VR4
                  stealths weigh a few hundred pounds less than vr4s
                  \'99 SSM Camaro V6 M5<br />(mod list on cardomain site; too long to list here)<br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/v6cam99\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/id/v6cam99</a>

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    but basically they are the same thing
                    2003 Chrome Silver Nissan 350z 6 Speed<br /><br />2001 Bright Rally Red Camaro 3800 M5-----SOLD but missed

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      ls1 hands down. the VR4 would have problems with the tranny and the LT1 would be needing a new optispark b/c of age. also a ls1 with high miles will most likely have lots of highway miles. also the ls1 is easier to work on than a lt1(think headers)
                      2002 NBM Pontiac Firebird Formula<br />Mods: stock...<br />1997 Chevy Camaro *Gone*<br />Mods:Borla,headers,Magnaflow cat, SLP intake, NOS 5175

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        oh oh... guess who i am... "the ls1 because its good ol' american muscle.... its NEVER gonna get beat by an import with two turbos..." hahaha need a hint? go visit the kill section... lol
                        disclaimer: \"warning.. this post may contain somewhat of a funny comment if read properly... take my comment out of context at your own discretion...\"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          What happen? I thought you were all hyped up in getting a Turbo.

                          I voted for VR4 because those things are a blast to drive and handles corners like there's no tomorrow. Plus, it's a rare car.

                          Yeah, it is expensive to fix when it breaks.

                          1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Depends on the mileage on the VR-4. I dunno where you guys are reading that they aren't reliable because I know alot of people that have them (because of my brother) and they are very reliable if you ask me. My friend Bobby has one and is running 12s (with mostly weight reduction mods) with a motor that has 160k miles on it. But for me, it would depend on the mileage of the VR4 and the LS1 because damn if the LT1 has the least miles I'd buy it.
                            \'99 SSM Camaro V6 M5<br />(mod list on cardomain site; too long to list here)<br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/v6cam99\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/id/v6cam99</a>

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by 99v6cam:
                              Depends on the mileage on the VR-4. I dunno where you guys are reading that they aren't reliable because I know alot of people that have them (because of my brother) and they are very reliable if you ask me. My friend Bobby has one and is running 12s (with mostly weight reduction mods) with a motor that has 160k miles on it. But for me, it would depend on the mileage of the VR4 and the LS1 because damn if the LT1 has the least miles I'd buy it.
                              I have a cousin that has a 3000GT and it does break. I guess it's does depend how you drive and I know how he drives his. The parts are expensive and that car is alot harder to fix than an F-body.

                              1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X