Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I saw it tonight thought it was a great movie. There were basically no gadgets what so ever but still amazing and long but the length didnt effect the movie i noticed a blooper/easter egg (something editing didnt catch) in the movie the chick plugged in the defibulator and wen they looked back at the wire it was plugged in then they looked at her then back at the dude and it wasnt plugged in then they looked back at her then back at him and it was plugged in lol i no im a loser but i love to catch those little things in a movie
and in the start of the movie bond was driving some kind of Ford
Haha, i was going to start this exact thread cuz i saw it today as well! And i have to agree: it was a fantastic movie.
Being a loser, i've read the book, and at the time i thought to myself "wow.. no wonder they never turned this one into a movie". Cuz the book doesn't really lend itself to the high octane action thrillers that we expect out of bond films today. But suprize suprize, they did a great job of adapting the plot for todays movie goers while still being faithful to the original.
Its so good i'd say this easily ranks in my top three favorite bond films with The Living Daylights, and Goldfinger. :tup: :tup:
Originally posted by SSMOWS6
i mean, you can always fly wes out there and since he's a tool sometimes, fashion him into a plow for the maro
i dont know how much i'll like a blond Bond... i think Rodger Moore was the best followed by Brosnan. I see Sean Connery and all i think is Celebrity Jeopardy.
2000 3.8L Camaro A4 Pewter Y87<br />K&N Filter, SLP Ram Air kit, Eibach Pro Kit, Flowmaster 80 series, Silverstars, NGK plugs and MSD Super Conductor Wires, Electric Water Pump
i dont know how much i'll like a blond Bond... i think Rodger Moore was the best followed by Brosnan. I see Sean Connery and all i think is Celebrity Jeopardy.
Daniel Craig plays a far more convincing bond than Roger Moore ever did... seriously tho. Its a really good movie. You know how most "bond films" get compared to the other "bond films"? Well this one you can easily compare to other films in general.
And as far as him being blond.... pfft. Whatever, makes no difference at all.
Originally posted by SSMOWS6
i mean, you can always fly wes out there and since he's a tool sometimes, fashion him into a plow for the maro
ya i just saw it today, all i can say is....FREAKING AWESOME! its by far the best bond movie ive seen yet, and as for Daniel Craig, well he's just the man, thats all there is to it.
Daniel Craig= BA (BadAss)
2000 Camaro 3.8l T5<br />whisper lid, free ram air mod
ya i just saw it today, all i can say is....FREAKING AWESOME! its by far the best bond movie ive seen yet, and as for Daniel Craig, well he's just the man, thats all there is to it.
Daniel Craig= BA (BadAss)
I'd go so far as to say BAMF (BadAssMother****er)
Originally posted by SSMOWS6
i mean, you can always fly wes out there and since he's a tool sometimes, fashion him into a plow for the maro
I saw it yesterday. It isn't what one would think of when they think about a typical Bond movie, but it was pretty good.
The best part was when bond was chasing that guy around the construction site. That guy was a total badass. The worst part was not seeing enough of the DBS :drool:
Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...
3 weeks ago
FORUM SPONSORS
Collapse
Working...
X
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment