i heard that the 82-84 models were some of the lightest trans am/camaro's ever built is this true? reason im askin is i want to build up a 83 firebird i could probly dig up real cheap i already have a 350 i can put in it and build up:naughty:
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
82-84 trans am/camaro
Collapse
X
-
Re: 82-84 trans am/camaro
3rd gens period are. pretty sure maros are lighter of the 2
current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it
Follow me!
http://www.twitch.tv/optimusprymrib
Or this
-
Re: 82-84 trans am/camaro
ha! put it this way..
stock lt1 in a 4th gen times: 14s/high 13s
stock lt1 in a 3rd gen times: low 13s
you tell me which is lighter
current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it
Follow me!
http://www.twitch.tv/optimusprymrib
Or this
Comment
-
Re: 82-84 trans am/camaro
Originally posted by 96greenmachinethats what i thought too and always thought thats why our v6's beat those cars stock... very weird but hey if there truely the lightest then im goin for the 3rd gen :)1999 Camaro Z/28
1973 Firebird Formula
Comment
Comment