ls1 vs 3800 - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ls1 vs 3800

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: ls1 vs 3800

    Originally posted by Smoke Panther View Post


    you're thinking about 12secondV6
    ah, yes... you are correct.


    My bad.
    *Matt


    Old people shouldnt use the internet.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: ls1 vs 3800

      x2 to everything smokepanther said.

      current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it

      Follow me!
      http://www.twitch.tv/optimusprymrib
      Or this

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: ls1 vs 3800

        well thank you all for your opinions...it has made me realize a couple of things, and probably helped me make up my mind. i owe 10k still on my 01 sixer(due to warrenties that were added by my parents..ouch) but if i can sell it for around 9k ill go straight for an ls1(nothin against the sixers, i think they are great). well thanks again to everyone

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: ls1 vs 3800

          Originally posted by 3800v6 View Post
          well thank you all for your opinions...it has made me realize a couple of things, and probably helped me make up my mind. i owe 10k still on my 01 sixer(due to warrenties that were added by my parents..ouch) but if i can sell it for around 9k ill go straight for an ls1(nothin against the sixers, i think they are great). well thanks again to everyone
          There is no way you are going to get near 9k for a 3.8L 4th gen anymore...I'm trying to sell mine for half that and its in good shape.

          I have a 3.8L and an LT1. Even with an LT1 I would pick that over the 3.8L anyday. So much more fun to drive especially with a 6 speed and just the exhaust note...

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: ls1 vs 3800

            The question was what do you like better , a personal choice, not LS1 power to the 3800's power stock for stock , I just said I like the 3800 better than the LS1 that's just me. Then you guys started comparing HP to HP which is a waste because ones a V8 and one is a 6, might as well compare a LS7 vette to a LS1 stock for stock. My answer was a personal choice of which I like better, which the OP ask the question and I answered , then everyone got off the topic, You should of just posted which you like better and stayed on the topic. I still vote for a 3800.
            08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
            96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: ls1 vs 3800

              Originally posted by savagecamaro96 View Post
              lmao what?!?!
              the 3800 has less hp/ci than the LS1
              i never brought the 3.8l up comparing it to the ls1 hp/ci ratio

              Originally posted by Smoke Panther View Post
              It's ricer math because it hp/ci numbers don't mean a ****ing thing in terms of what car is faster than another car, or which performs better. It's just a meaningless number that little boy-racers, who run their mouth more than their car, throw around in a vain attempt to intimidate others


              Name 10 people that run 12's or faster, with a DD'd 3.8 that's still running today
              im not even talking about performance, all i said is it is a joke to think that the ls1 can barely give 1hp per ci.. especially with the HUGE amount of technology advances in the past 40+ years the SBC was dominate

              hell, we have an ls7 engine.. 427ci that is putting out over 500hp.. yeah thats more like it

              or you can take a supercharged 383 (ls9) and it is making 620hp.. now, i know it is FI, but i can almost guarantee that the blower isnt producing the extra 300hp

              and if it is ricer math, how come it has been discussed about since the FIFTIES, thats almost SIXTY freaking years

              and do a google search about hp per ci, and the FIRST FREAKING LINK IS FROM AN LS2 WEBSITE.. yeah thats REALLY being a ricer

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: ls1 vs 3800

                Originally posted by ssms5411 View Post
                The question was what do you like better , a personal choice, not LS1 power to the 3800's power stock for stock , I just said I like the 3800 better than the LS1 that's just me. Then you guys started comparing HP to HP which is a waste because ones a V8 and one is a 6, might as well compare a LS7 vette to a LS1 stock for stock. My answer was a personal choice of which I like better, which the OP ask the question and I answered , then everyone got off the topic, You should of just posted which you like better and stayed on the topic. I still vote for a 3800.
                just to clarify, i did not compare the hp numbers between the engines, i went through and listed the positive and negatives of the engines, and for some reason i get called a ricer by someone on this forum

                edit* toned down the language
                Last edited by cam98aro; 01-07-2009, 08:04 PM.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: ls1 vs 3800

                  Originally posted by 3800v6 View Post
                  well thank you all for your opinions...it has made me realize a couple of things, and probably helped me make up my mind. i owe 10k still on my 01 sixer(due to warrenties that were added by my parents..ouch) but if i can sell it for around 9k ill go straight for an ls1(nothin against the sixers, i think they are great). well thanks again to everyone
                  hate to break it to you, but i have seen some 01' z28's go for $9-11k.. i dont think you will get that much out of a v6

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: ls1 vs 3800

                    Originally posted by cam98aro View Post
                    and if it is ricer math, how come it has been discussed about since the FIFTIES, thats almost SIXTY freaking years

                    and do a google search about hp per ci, and the FIRST FREAKING LINK IS FROM AN LS2 WEBSITE.. yeah thats REALLY being a ricer
                    Doesn't matter if John Force starts talking about hp/ci ratios...What I say is still true
                    Originally posted by Smoke Panther View Post
                    It's just a meaningless number that little boy-racers, who run their mouth more than their car, throw around in a vain attempt to intimidate others

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: ls1 vs 3800

                      Originally posted by cam98aro View Post
                      i never brought the 3.8l up comparing it to the ls1 hp/ci ratio



                      im not even talking about performance, all i said is it is a joke to think that the ls1 can barely give 1hp per ci.. especially with the HUGE amount of technology advances in the past 40+ years the SBC was dominate

                      hell, we have an ls7 engine.. 427ci that is putting out over 500hp.. yeah thats more like it

                      or you can take a supercharged 383 (ls9) and it is making 620hp.. now, i know it is FI, but i can almost guarantee that the blower isnt producing the extra 300hp

                      and if it is ricer math, how come it has been discussed about since the FIFTIES, thats almost SIXTY freaking years

                      and do a google search about hp per ci, and the FIRST FREAKING LINK IS FROM AN LS2 WEBSITE.. yeah thats REALLY being a ricer
                      are you really comparing motors that were specially built for a specific high end corvette vs a motor that has been globally used through out the world and numerous vehicles? the ls7 was designed for one thing and one car. the ls9 (a 376 FYI) is a reworked 6.2 escalade motor that GMPP took and beefed up with better everything (better know as the L92, which in the caddy truck already produced 403hp) no the blower isnt producing an extra 300 hp, but the heads used, the cam, and other improvements along with the supercharger do.

                      current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it

                      Follow me!
                      http://www.twitch.tv/optimusprymrib
                      Or this

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: ls1 vs 3800

                        Originally posted by 00FlowCamaro View Post
                        There is no way you are going to get near 9k for a 3.8L 4th gen anymore...I'm trying to sell mine for half that and its in good shape.

                        I have a 3.8L and an LT1. Even with an LT1 I would pick that over the 3.8L anyday. So much more fun to drive especially with a 6 speed and just the exhaust note...
                        Originally posted by cam98aro View Post
                        hate to break it to you, but i have seen some 01' z28's go for $9-11k.. i dont think you will get that much out of a v6
                        i agree with both of you. but here in peoria i have seen quite a few sixers go for around 10k, and personally i think mine is in better shape then those that i saw. its an 01 with only 58k miles in mint condition. plus the magnaflow exhaust and brand new tires. and the warrenties i got go with it..

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: ls1 vs 3800

                          Originally posted by cam98aro View Post
                          just to clarify, i did not compare the hp numbers between the engines, i went through and listed the positive and negatives of the engines, and for some reason i get called a ricer by someone on this forum

                          edit* toned down the language
                          Mine wasn't directed at you , I was just saying everyone should just post I like 3800 or I like LS1 instead of debating a V6 against a V8. Should of just posted a poll. I guess if your a ricer then everyone on this forum is since it is a 3800 forum. I guess I'm a ricer with a 3800 too then. I post pics of my stickers on my car when I get it back from paint.LOL
                          08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
                          96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: ls1 vs 3800

                            you know, its not like you have to check the thread if you dont like where its heading.

                            current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it

                            Follow me!
                            http://www.twitch.tv/optimusprymrib
                            Or this

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: ls1 vs 3800

                              Originally posted by vanbibber View Post
                              you know, its not like you have to check the thread if you dont like where its heading.
                              XXXXX2
                              08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
                              96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: ls1 vs 3800

                                The sheer basis of this thread amuses me. When you compare an LS1 to a Benz, that makes sense. One has power, one has luxury. One is sporty, one is elegant.

                                When you are comparing the LS1 with the 3.8, they are the same in every aspect other than performance, in which the 3.8 is drastically worse. Yes, insurance is cheaper (barely) and MPG is slightly better, but that doesn't mean much when you are saying which you prefer.

                                I love my v6... I have put a lot of money into it, and we still make sexy time every once in a while. However, I can come to terms with the fact that frankly, my car isn't sh!t compared to an LS1. The LS1 has everything that I have, and more!

                                There is a lot that I wanted to respond to in this thread, but I would like to see an age poll before continuing. The average maturity of this site is plummeting.
                                2002 SOM Camaro- Sold
                                2006 S60- Sold
                                2000 Cherokee- The desert whip

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                • Dongrossmd
                                  Throttle Position Sensor trouble shooting
                                  by Dongrossmd
                                  I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...
                                  3 weeks ago
                                • ssms5411
                                  New stereo
                                  by ssms5411
                                  Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...
                                  3 weeks ago

                                FORUM SPONSORS

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X