Wow...

[candyblueta]

My v6 camaro DESTROYED a GT mustang (95) with exhaust....... wtf??? LOL!!!!! if i got beat in a v8 GT stang by a v6, my car would be sold by the next morning lol! MUSTANG GT FTL!!!! :tdown:

[kristen]

Re: Wow...

reason we don't have a kill section. plus those year gets are slow as balls

[cam98aro]

Re: Wow...

they put really crappy, low flowing heads on the 98 and under stangs (IIRC).. my friend had one, and my dads 3.4 impala seemed faster than it.. the mustang couldnt even spin the back tires

[StrtRacer98]

Re: Wow...

Isnt the 95 GT still the 5.0? or was the last year 94?

A guy from my town that is in my off-roading club has a 95 with a 5.0 n/a that is pretty built, and that car is nothing to mess with... I was very impressed.

[whitdog54]

Re: Wow...

Isnt the 95 GT still the 5.0? or was the last year 94?

A guy from my town that is in my off-roading club has a 95 with a 5.0 n/a that is pretty built, and that car is nothing to mess with... I was very impressed.

Takes very little to make a 5.0 fast...I wanna find an unmolested fox body and build it up.

[jrherald420]

Re: Wow...

94-95's were a 5.0 rated at 215 hp at 4200 rpms and 285 ft-lbs of tq at 3400 rpms....if he had just a cat back he might have been pushing 220 hp on a good day....

[Conman5280]

Re: Wow...

Yeah I went against a stock one once that seemed beat to **** haha, some smoke was comn out, n i held with him

[firebird19_99]

Re: Wow...

i dont really like mustangs, the 2009 v6 just puts 210hp, 10hp difference between ours and they have 7 more years on us.

[VTJosh]

Re: Wow...

I'm a diehard Mustang fan more than I am for Camaro's. Like mentioned earlier the heads on the pre 99 GT's is the problem, in 99 they started installing the PI or performance improved heads which flow alot better. 95 was the last year for the 5.0 than they started the 4.6