G-tech numbers - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

G-tech numbers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • G-tech numbers

    I tested my car with a G-tech and I did 0-60 in 8.1s, and the 1/4 in 16.49@86.3mph
    Do those numbers match? If they do then I should run at least a 16.1-16.2 at the track due to better traction :rolleyes: . Anyone with some G-tech times?
    \'94 Firebird \"El Pichon\" 3.4L A4<br />Mods: CAI,NO CAT,NO EGR,<br />NO PCV,TB BYPASS,SLP IAT module,<br />Dynomax Super Turbo Muffler 2.5\" Dual,low temp stat, fan swtich<br /><a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/lando_pr\" target=\"_blank\">35 years of Firebird</a>

  • #2
    what engine do you have? what mods?
    96 Camaro M5. Dark metallic gree (?dont know the offical color name)<br />Home made Intake :: Headers, 3inch headers back to Flowmaster muffler :: spec stage 3 clutch Now installed, waiting for 3.42\'s and LSD next month<br /><a href=\"http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/RiceEatingCamaro/?action=view&current=newcar.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">My Car</a> <br /><br />Totalled Car.<br /><a href=\"http://bellsouthpwp.net/s/k/sk8er305/\" target=\"_blank\">96 CamaroRS</a>

    Comment


    • #3
      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Tyler:
      what engine do you have? what mods?<hr></blockquote>

      3.4L auto tranny
      Home made CAI,SLP IAT module,no cat,no EGR,TB Bypass,3.73's(damaged),ASP crank UD pulley,Dynomax super turbo muffler
      \'94 Firebird \"El Pichon\" 3.4L A4<br />Mods: CAI,NO CAT,NO EGR,<br />NO PCV,TB BYPASS,SLP IAT module,<br />Dynomax Super Turbo Muffler 2.5\" Dual,low temp stat, fan swtich<br /><a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/lando_pr\" target=\"_blank\">35 years of Firebird</a>

      Comment


      • #4
        MPH way too high...rest looks about right...and maybe up that 0-60 to an 8.7-8.8. 1/4mi time is rather accurate tho.

        Comment


        • #5
          yea 1/4 mile sounds good but your should have more like 81-82mph not 86
          1998 Jet Black Trans-am M6 T-tops<br />\"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find: knock and it shall be opened unto you:-Matthew 7:7<br />Old car<br /><a href=\"http://matthew27529.tripod.com/getsome\" target=\"_blank\">http://matthew27529.tripod.com/getsome</a><br />NEW CAR<br /><a href=\"http://garnerebel.tripod.com/\" target=\"_blank\">http://garnerebel.tripod.com/</a>

          Comment


          • #6
            <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by southern94:
            yea 1/4 mile sounds good but your should have more like 81-82mph not 86<hr></blockquote>
            my thoughts exactly
            New Car: 2004 GTP Comp G (Test Vehicle) 13.936@99.32 <br />Mods: Cylinder Filter,No Mufflers, 3.3\" <br />Old Car: 2000 Formula 13.124 @ 106.01 with 2.73\'s<br />Other Car: 1993 Firebird 16.1@83

            Comment


            • #7
              <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by mr_man:

              my thoughts exactly
              <hr></blockquote>

              All g-tech mph's are usually +4 of what you would normally run at a track.

              As for times. Most people get w/in a few 10ths slower on the track than what they did on the g-tech.

              My best g-tech was 15.54, while my best track was 15.67.
              <a href=\"http://groups.msn.com/WhoisNightRider/bluethunder.msnw\" target=\"_blank\">2002 Electron Blue Corvette Coupe</a><br /><i>13.083@108.23</i><br /><br /><a href=\"http://groups.msn.com/WhoisNightRider/redfire.msnw\" target=\"_blank\">2002 Metallic Red Grandprix GTP</a> <b>SOLD</b><br /><i>14.49@94.42 (Bone stock)</i><br /><br />2002 Black Convertible Camaro Z28<br /><i>times comming real soon!</i>

              Comment


              • #8
                so the gtech's are rather accurate then ... me and a friend were thinking of splittin one ... are they worth it?
                Ricky LaFave<br />\'89 Beretta GT<br />16.304@83mph .5006 R/T<br />Proud Member of Tristate GM<br /><a href=\"http://liquid2k.com/yokramer\" target=\"_blank\">Check out my Beretta</a>

                Comment


                • #9
                  <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Ricky LaFave:
                  so the gtech's are rather accurate then ... me and a friend were thinking of splittin one ... are they worth it?<hr></blockquote>

                  Yea, I think they are worth it if you split it with ppl. My friends and I got one, and paid $27 each, so not too much of a loss. They're fun to play with, but after you've tested your car a hundred times, you'll get bored with it, but that's ok cuz you didn't spend a lot of money on it.
                  1998 Arctic White Camaro<br />3.8L V6 M5<br />Flowmaster 80 Series with 3\" tips<br />Whisper Lid w/ K&N<br />Flowtech Cutout<br />Free-Ram Air Mod<br />Blue Underbody Neon Kit<br />3 MTX 6000 10\" Subs<br />Rockford 800a2 Amp<br /><a href=\"http://photos.yahoo.com/jeep327\" target=\"_blank\">My Camaro</a>

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Camaro3.8L:

                    They're fun to play with, but after you've tested your car a hundred times, you'll get bored with it, but that's ok cuz you didn't spend a lot of money on it.
                    <hr></blockquote>

                    Very true. They're useful for testing & tunning w/ new modds, but eventually i needed actually track #'s. Check the forsale boards, i sold mine for like $70. awhile back.
                    <a href=\"http://groups.msn.com/WhoisNightRider/bluethunder.msnw\" target=\"_blank\">2002 Electron Blue Corvette Coupe</a><br /><i>13.083@108.23</i><br /><br /><a href=\"http://groups.msn.com/WhoisNightRider/redfire.msnw\" target=\"_blank\">2002 Metallic Red Grandprix GTP</a> <b>SOLD</b><br /><i>14.49@94.42 (Bone stock)</i><br /><br />2002 Black Convertible Camaro Z28<br /><i>times comming real soon!</i>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by lando_pr:
                      I tested my car with a G-tech and I did 0-60 in 8.1s, and the 1/4 in 16.49@86.3mph
                      Do those numbers match? If they do then I should run at least a 16.1-16.2 at the track due to better traction :rolleyes: . Anyone with some G-tech times?
                      <hr></blockquote>

                      wow..i have a 4 banger..w/ around 115 horsepower to the ground. i have a stock Dx motor(96 hp to the ground) w/ Cold Air intake, Cam Gear and no cat. Best time was 16.2 [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img]
                      1996 Honda Civic Hatch<p><a href=\"http://www.jspek.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.jspek.com</a>

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        you have to remember your car weighs prolly 2/3 as much

                        i have 125 to the wheels and run a 16.431 best ever but i weigh 2700 lbs ... how much does your car weigh?

                        [ April 24, 2002: Message edited by: Ricky LaFave ]</p>
                        Ricky LaFave<br />\'89 Beretta GT<br />16.304@83mph .5006 R/T<br />Proud Member of Tristate GM<br /><a href=\"http://liquid2k.com/yokramer\" target=\"_blank\">Check out my Beretta</a>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          :D :D :D

                          2384 w/ me in it..and my backpack and spare..and cds..and some other small stuff. the weighing was done at Houston Raceway Park
                          1996 Honda Civic Hatch<p><a href=\"http://www.jspek.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.jspek.com</a>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Gandhibrokemyskates:
                            :D :D :D

                            2384 w/ me in it..and my backpack and spare..and cds..and some other small stuff. the weighing was done at Houston Raceway Park
                            <hr></blockquote>

                            proves my point ... i have a 2.8 and weigh 2700-3000 w/ me and excess weight ... i run a 16.4 w/ full interior and spare and a tool box ... he runs a 16.4 with a heavier car and a bigger engine .. you run a 16.2 w/ a lighter car and smaller engine ... all physics my friend ... not that i remember it all that much

                            :D
                            Ricky LaFave<br />\'89 Beretta GT<br />16.304@83mph .5006 R/T<br />Proud Member of Tristate GM<br /><a href=\"http://liquid2k.com/yokramer\" target=\"_blank\">Check out my Beretta</a>

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              yea..i just like to brag how light my car is [img]redface.gif[/img]

                              ..but then you can brag about having more horsepower. oh well..i can just drop another more powerful engine in my car :D and it will still be light.
                              1996 Honda Civic Hatch<p><a href=\"http://www.jspek.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.jspek.com</a>

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              • Dongrossmd
                                Throttle Position Sensor trouble shooting
                                by Dongrossmd
                                I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...
                                2 weeks ago
                              • ssms5411
                                New stereo
                                by ssms5411
                                Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...
                                2 weeks ago

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X