Scanned in my 13.8 and 14.0 NA timeslips...

[Magnus]

Well, many of you have e-mailed and IM'd me about my web page and the out dated timeslips, so I finally scanned them in today. [img]smile.gif[/img]

Here is my 1.802 60' 14.076@94.11 stock H/C


Here is the 1.820 60' 13.832@96.14 aftermarket H/C


The 13.832 timeslip is VERY light so its hard to scan.. so that is just more reason to run a new best.. WHICH I will do in time. [img]smile.gif[/img]

Also, you CAN post images in the drag racing section, but ONLY your timeslips. Nobody has ever used this before but here is something to remind you.

Also #2, for those of you who have timeslips on the page and no scanned copy, If you ever get a chance, please scan it in. The more scanned slips I put on the page, the more reputable it will be.

Thank you.

[99Camaro99]

sweet runs...but I do have a question in general tho...how come all the V6s in the 13s and better trap so low? Do our cars still fall flat on their face at top end?

like the 12.3 @ 104. I've seen LS1s hit 12.3 @ 112 or so and that 104 is with a time of like 13.3 - 13.5. Just wondering. :rolleyes:

[ May 01, 2002: Message edited by: 99Camaro99 ]</p>

[DominusEtDeusNatus]

I'm going to have to raise the [img]graemlins/bs.gif[/img] on those timesplips.

[TheBeast]

Actually that 2nd slip is of a 14.2X @ 92.XX?? I think you posted the wrong link [img]smile.gif[/img]

edit: ah, there we go ;)

[ May 01, 2002: Message edited by: TheBeast ]</p>

[Tiago]

they trap low because all the real fast ones are running with a big converter. converter gives et but looses mph...

[bluecmaro96]

[img]graemlins/bs.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bs.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/bs.gif[/img] theres no way a 3.8 could ever do that, i mean its just a 6 :D

[camaro_zach]

hahahaha dom, raise the bs flag. hahaha that made me laugh pretty hard. But way to go man! glad to hear somones walk instead of talk.

[Magnus]

Thanks guys. [img]smile.gif[/img]

My car doesn't make much HP.. MPH is directly related to HP. My car is just setup to get there very quickly.

Look at my 1/8th. :D 8.709, almost 8.6.. [img]smile.gif[/img]

My car accelerates VERY quickly, just doesn't pull enough on the big end to pick up more MPH.

[DEE97GTP]

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Magnus:
Thanks guys. [img]smile.gif[/img]
Look at my 1/8th. :D 8.709, almost 8.6.. [img]smile.gif[/img]

My car accelerates VERY quickly, just doesn't pull enough on the big end to pick up more MPH.<hr></blockquote>

Yeah, look at that 60ft. ;) I could only dream of pulling a 1.8. I went to the 1/8th last weekend and could only pull a 2.05 on nittos. Which put me right at 8.8@79mph. Temp 75 degrees, humidity 83%. I think the car has more in it, going to try a few things next time.

DEE

[Pro Stock John]

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 99Camaro99:
sweet runs...but I do have a question in general tho...how come all the V6s in the 13s and better trap so low? Do our cars still fall flat on their face at top end?

like the 12.3 @ 104. I've seen LS1s hit 12.3 @ 112 or so and that 104 is with a time of like 13.3 - 13.5. Just wondering.
<hr></blockquote>

Good point there. I agree.

When Magnus' car still had a stock longblock he basically was as fast as a stock 93-97 LT1. He's now running close to what a stock LS1 might run.

I think that some of the V6 guys like Magnus and James need to look more into their combo's. I could say what I would change but I am on Keith's pit crew and we'll try a few ideas on his car first. [img]smile.gif[/img]

John

[ May 02, 2002: Message edited by: Pro Stock John ]</p>