well, i finally got out to the track. temp was about 78 and humidity was about 60% in seguin, texas (right outside of san antonio). anyway, it was a blast, but out of 10 lousy runs, my best time was:
60 ft.--2.357
1/4 et--15.78
1/4 mph--86.85
i had a few higher mph runs--highest was like an 88 i think. but it's weird, cause for those times i would have expected low 15s or even high 14s? a stock lt1 ran no better than a 14.4 all night and brand new collectors edition TA ran only a 13.9--so that gives you an idea of the circumstances and the bad weather/elevation/stuff. o well, no biggy, doesn't really bother me. nothing is cooler than paying the money i did to see a turbo'd 5.0 L mustang run a 7.8@194.1 mph [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img]
[ September 19, 2002: Message edited by: Only4U ]</p>
60 ft.--2.357
1/4 et--15.78
1/4 mph--86.85
i had a few higher mph runs--highest was like an 88 i think. but it's weird, cause for those times i would have expected low 15s or even high 14s? a stock lt1 ran no better than a 14.4 all night and brand new collectors edition TA ran only a 13.9--so that gives you an idea of the circumstances and the bad weather/elevation/stuff. o well, no biggy, doesn't really bother me. nothing is cooler than paying the money i did to see a turbo'd 5.0 L mustang run a 7.8@194.1 mph [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img]
[ September 19, 2002: Message edited by: Only4U ]</p>
Comment