14.90@91 nearly stock - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

14.90@91 nearly stock

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Tiago NOS'd Bird:
    kumhos don't hook for ****<hr></blockquote>

    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by NBMA4V6:


    werd :D
    <hr></blockquote>

    haha, you do realize that tiago, you've got a freaking turbo, and jeff, you've got a freaking high-stall converter--of COURSE they aren't going to hook for **** for you guys. but with a stock 3.8 and converter, i think they would have hooked better than the GA's he used.
    2000 NBM M6 Camaro Z28<br />323/335

    Comment


    • #17
      Is it just me or is there a lot of "Freaking" going on in here??
      1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
      1997 Dodge Viper GTS

      Comment


      • #18
        <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Only4U:
        you are the one that started in, man... :rolleyes: <hr></blockquote>

        Umm no, you need to stop the eye rolling. I simply told you the allowed variation in rocker ratio from which you generated the idea of some vehicles rolling off the line with all of the rockers being well over the stock ratio. I told you that scenario was so unlikely that it doesn't even matter.
        Matt<br />2000 Firebird<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/index.php?\" target=\"_blank\">FullThrottleV6.com</a>

        Comment


        • #19
          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by HAZ-Matt:


          Umm no, you need to stop the eye rolling. I simply told you the allowed variation in rocker ratio from which you generated the idea of some vehicles rolling off the line with all of the rockers being well over the stock ratio. I told you that scenario was so unlikely that it doesn't even matter.
          <hr></blockquote>

          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by HAZ-Matt:
          I simply told you <hr></blockquote>

          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Only4U:
          you are the one that started it<hr></blockquote>

          although i will admit i thought some cars got ALL of the "good" rocker arm ratio, i wasn't the first who suggested that ANY v6 fbody got a ratio of any different than 1.6...THAT was you, and THAT is why i generated the "crazy rocker arm conspiracy theory." [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]

          [ November 04, 2002: Message edited by: Only4U ]</p>
          2000 NBM M6 Camaro Z28<br />323/335

          Comment


          • #20
            Eh, don't worry bout the rocker arm thing guys. [img]smile.gif[/img]

            Lets keep this on topic.
            Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

            Comment


            • #21
              So we were talkin about the 14.90 run... I think that is all the more impressive on the Eagle GAys.
              Matt<br />2000 Firebird<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.fullthrottlev6.com/forums/index.php?\" target=\"_blank\">FullThrottleV6.com</a>

              Comment


              • #22
                I'm sad my car has 3.08s :(

                Good times, I would be proud of that car too. [img]smile.gif[/img]
                -Eric<br />2002 Navy Blue Camaro...Striped and Stalled. 35th Anniversary SS wheels <br />Best ET: 15.384 @ 88.32 on street tires<br />Project Whitney: Goal, 14.0 1/4 by summer 2008.

                Comment


                • #23
                  I'm sorry, but right now you guys are a little outta line.. You are going too far into this, yes I ran a 14.9,and it was on GA's. But I was merely suggesting JOKINGLY that I have a factory freak.. Now I am gonna just say I know how to drive my car. AND THAT IS WHAT WINS RACES that .7 light was the slowest light i have cut in a month and a half. Rocker Arms, ratios, and all that stuff.... I hope you guys arent making excuses why I am running what I do, and why your cars arent. but i dont want to get into this, cause a few do have faster times, and I am happy with what I ran and I know that come AIS my car will be around 14.5.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Congrats! Nice ET! [img]graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]
                    2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
                    1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
                    2011 Cadillac CTS-V
                    2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
                    2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Pewter2K1:
                      I'm sorry, but right now you guys are a little outta line.. You are going too far into this, yes I ran a 14.9,and it was on GA's. But I was merely suggesting JOKINGLY that I have a factory freak.. Now I am gonna just say I know how to drive my car. AND THAT IS WHAT WINS RACES that .7 light was the slowest light i have cut in a month and a half. Rocker Arms, ratios, and all that stuff.... I hope you guys arent making excuses why I am running what I do, and why your cars arent. but i dont want to get into this, cause a few do have faster times, and I am happy with what I ran and I know that come AIS my car will be around 14.5.<hr></blockquote>

                      chill man. weather does a lot to cars like you wouldn't believe. you ran a good time, i'm glad you did :D but you have to realize there are a lot of factors in racing and getting good times. be happy about your times, don't worry about what other people are saying. we didn't know you were joking about the freak thing, so we were offering suggestions as to why you might have run so well. rub it off the shoulder, aint no thang. :D
                      2000 NBM M6 Camaro Z28<br />323/335

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Not to shaby, keep up the good work
                        <b>Red 1999 Firebird M5</b><br />Whisper Lid,Borla Catback,K&N,Dual Friction Center Force Clutch,Hurst Shifter w/Lou\'s Short Stick,!FRA,Suncoast Ramair hood,160 Thermo,!maf,Chrome ZO6 Wheels, Painted Calipers, CIA Headers, Taylor Wires, NGK Spark Plugs, 3\" Catco, Jet Chip Stage II, BMR STB, LCA, PHR, SFC, Fan Switch, FTRA<br /><b>Old Dyno Numbers: 183 RWHP, 217 RWTRQ</b><br /><a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/redsixer\" target=\"_blank\">http://community.webshots.com/user/redsixer</a>

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          how do you smooth and raise the airbox?
                          Black Two-Triple-O<p><br />Hella?

                          Comment

                          Latest Topics

                          Collapse

                          There are no results that meet this criteria.

                          FORUM SPONSORS

                          Collapse
                          Working...
                          X