14.3 @ 95 N/A stock heads/cam 3.8 V6....

[Magnus]

No need to argue or debate. No need to flame either.

14.2 NA stock/heads is possible.. [img]smile.gif[/img] ;)

14.2 on the bottle is VERY easy.

There are some people out there who just make up stories for attention or fun. Then there are those who aren't part of the whole internet scene because when they DO come to a page and post their times, they get flamed by doubters.

I hope those that DO run the very impressive times, such as 12's on power adder (or even 11's) and low 14's or 13's NA do eventually make their way to the site and fight disbelief to convince us their times are real.. and thus making it to our timeslips page. [img]smile.gif[/img]

[shortdog273]

Yea, he didn't mention he was spraying until the last minute.

[Camarorulz]

Anyone see if he posted what shot of nitrous he was spraying?

[12secondv6]

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Camarorulz:
Anyone see if he posted what shot of nitrous he was spraying?<hr></blockquote>
I think a 50 shot

[Shirl]

He stated that he's running a 75 shot.. he said "I never said I was running it N/A".

[pgriffith]

<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Shirl:
He stated that he's running a 75 shot.. he said "I never said I was running it N/A".<hr></blockquote>

But he didnt mention that until he got cought trying to misconceive everyone into thinking he had a fast v6. ANd he is still lying about the flywheel.

[Formula]

automatics have flexplates not flywheels. and the early 90s 3.4 v6 are internally balanced (i actually assumed the 3.8 would be too, but i guess i was wrong). when I put the 3.4 camaro v6 in my fiero I had to use a non-weighted flexplate compared to the fieros weighted flexplate (i had an 85 2.8 motor, 88 and up 2.8s are internally balanced). They do make stronger flexplates for the 2.8-3.4 years, I actually broke my first one with my carbed 3.4.

....and I don't know what this has to do with the post, I was just blabbing.