jeff--i was saying that your converter has not added much to you at all :rolleyes: and mine has added a lot for me, that's all i was saying. so don't tell me to shut the **** up, i'm trying to prove a point, if it offends you that i used you as an example, then god, i'm so sorry.
jason, like i said, i don't give a **** what you think. if you are calling me out, you can come meet me, i'm not driving halfway across the state cause YOU want to race me. i got the 14 before christmas like i wanted, so i'm happy. my converter gave me 4 tenths of an improvement. if my car is in fact a slow one, i still managed to gain more out of a converter than jeff (so far...and once again, i'm using you as an example, so don't get all pissy again...). honestly, if it weren't for the fact that i've raced a lot of friend's v6 fbody's and they all do as well or a little worse than me, then i would believe you guys that my car was in fact, slow. but since i know what v6 fbodies are capable of, i think it's retarted to assume that my car is slow, whereas, all the cars i've raced up to this point must be slow as well. jason, your reasoning is very faulty, and obviously you feel like you have something to prove.
on the other hand (talking about your other stupid point, jason) my point is well proven, i've raced at temple, and i have raced at seguin. at temple, my mph's are ALWAYS higher, and my times before the converter, were ALWAYS .2-.4 quicker than my times at RCR due to elevation SOLELY. i know for a FACT that if temple had the RCR track, then my times would be in the 14.7-14.8 range, cause i was hitting 15.2s on 2.3 60 fts the last time i was at temple. and every single time i'm at rcr with the verter, i'm barely pulling sub 2 sec 60fts, and my mph is pretty low for the also low time i pull. now tell me, why would one car pull a 15.2 with a 2.3 60ft and then a week later pull a 14.98 with a 1.98 60ft??? did my car get slower??? do your math, .1 in the 60ft equals .2 in the quarter, therefore, at temple, if i had run the 1.98, then i would have run a 14.5-14.6. so, i am not sure what you are trying to prove? and if you are trying to make me look like a dumbass, once again, like many of your friends, you failed. now shut the **** up and come race me you whiny son of a *****.
[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: Only4U ]</p>
jason, like i said, i don't give a **** what you think. if you are calling me out, you can come meet me, i'm not driving halfway across the state cause YOU want to race me. i got the 14 before christmas like i wanted, so i'm happy. my converter gave me 4 tenths of an improvement. if my car is in fact a slow one, i still managed to gain more out of a converter than jeff (so far...and once again, i'm using you as an example, so don't get all pissy again...). honestly, if it weren't for the fact that i've raced a lot of friend's v6 fbody's and they all do as well or a little worse than me, then i would believe you guys that my car was in fact, slow. but since i know what v6 fbodies are capable of, i think it's retarted to assume that my car is slow, whereas, all the cars i've raced up to this point must be slow as well. jason, your reasoning is very faulty, and obviously you feel like you have something to prove.
on the other hand (talking about your other stupid point, jason) my point is well proven, i've raced at temple, and i have raced at seguin. at temple, my mph's are ALWAYS higher, and my times before the converter, were ALWAYS .2-.4 quicker than my times at RCR due to elevation SOLELY. i know for a FACT that if temple had the RCR track, then my times would be in the 14.7-14.8 range, cause i was hitting 15.2s on 2.3 60 fts the last time i was at temple. and every single time i'm at rcr with the verter, i'm barely pulling sub 2 sec 60fts, and my mph is pretty low for the also low time i pull. now tell me, why would one car pull a 15.2 with a 2.3 60ft and then a week later pull a 14.98 with a 1.98 60ft??? did my car get slower??? do your math, .1 in the 60ft equals .2 in the quarter, therefore, at temple, if i had run the 1.98, then i would have run a 14.5-14.6. so, i am not sure what you are trying to prove? and if you are trying to make me look like a dumbass, once again, like many of your friends, you failed. now shut the **** up and come race me you whiny son of a *****.
[ December 11, 2002: Message edited by: Only4U ]</p>
Comment