Fusion, the excuse is not that great. First off I manage the timeslips page with an unbiased point of view. If you run better than me, so be it. What does it matter? You think I'm going to be #1 forever? Not hardly.
It's a 3.4 secondly. Did he run faster than 12.3? I doubt that. Faster than my NA bests, perhaps.. but so what.
However, I would need some decent amount of proof. Moving up the 3.4 record from high 13's to high 12's isn't something I can just accept. Having a timeslip doen't prove anything either. I could show plenty of timeslips to friends and claim they where mine.. Again, I screen the submissions carefully.
And if his mailbox gets full of BS, then why can't he just delete the e-mails? Nobody says you have to respond to all.
The whole dig about me not beleiving his timeslip because "he's faster than I" is pure crap. Why you would say such a remark I'm not sure. I take much offense to that comment though. It pisses me off really that you would imply that I wouldn't accept anyone who runs a quicker ET than I. :mad:
It's a 3.4 secondly. Did he run faster than 12.3? I doubt that. Faster than my NA bests, perhaps.. but so what.
However, I would need some decent amount of proof. Moving up the 3.4 record from high 13's to high 12's isn't something I can just accept. Having a timeslip doen't prove anything either. I could show plenty of timeslips to friends and claim they where mine.. Again, I screen the submissions carefully.
And if his mailbox gets full of BS, then why can't he just delete the e-mails? Nobody says you have to respond to all.
The whole dig about me not beleiving his timeslip because "he's faster than I" is pure crap. Why you would say such a remark I'm not sure. I take much offense to that comment though. It pisses me off really that you would imply that I wouldn't accept anyone who runs a quicker ET than I. :mad:
Comment