Tried my different setup, and got a lesson on the "myth of backpressure" - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Tried my different setup, and got a lesson on the "myth of backpressure"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    How big a shot are you going with on the direct port? What all have you got behind it to support it?
    \" As being is to becoming, so is pure itellect to opinion, so is science to belief, and understanding to the peception of shadows.\" - Plato

    Comment


    • #17
      Starting at a 150 and maxing out eventually at a 200 shot.

      When you say behind it, what do you mean?
      Tranny?
      Rear?
      Tires?
      ??

      [ February 02, 2003: Message edited by: 12secondv6 ]</p>
      Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
      nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
      2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
      2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

      Comment


      • #18
        I'm sure he's asking what kind of internal mods do you have done to support that large of shot.
        ---<br />-\'95 3.4L M5 Camaro

        Comment


        • #19
          I have done this before, maybe its differnet on a 3.4L but an open Y-pipe I ran a 16.2, added a clogged cat and ran 15.8s.


          Normally I can say track results are not the end all sayings, but I am a VERY consistent driver, and a .4 difference is pretty big difference for me.

          helel I ran a 15.661, twice in the same night down to the thousandth of a second. [img]smile.gif[/img]

          Comment


          • #20
            I would also like to add... I know Magnus got some gains off an open y-pipe, but I can gurantee the average car does not.

            Comment


            • #21
              <blockquote>quote:</font><hr> Starting at a 150 and maxing out eventually at a 200 shot.
              When you say behind it, what do you mean?
              Tranny?
              Rear?
              Tires? <hr></blockquote>

              Internals mostly. That and what kind of computer tuning are you doing?
              \" As being is to becoming, so is pure itellect to opinion, so is science to belief, and understanding to the peception of shadows.\" - Plato

              Comment


              • #22
                <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>I have done this before, maybe its differnet on a 3.4L but an open Y-pipe I ran a 16.2, added a clogged cat and ran 15.8s. <hr></blockquote>

                What was your MPH on those runs? (respectively)
                I'm going to guess that your 16.2 had a higher MPH than the 15.8. Even if the two MPH's are the same it would show that you had more HP on the slower time. (If that makes any sense)
                \" As being is to becoming, so is pure itellect to opinion, so is science to belief, and understanding to the peception of shadows.\" - Plato

                Comment


                • #23
                  they were about 1-1.5 mph slower


                  same as when i ran the car that I posted earlier...


                  remember my cutout is located in front of my CAT, right off the Y-pipe, not all the way in the back before the rear axle like most cars.

                  Just posting what happened with my car if you guys have results to prove a different setup works for you, go for it.

                  open cutout on y-pipe is not ideal for me, and not ideal for 12sec on the dyno. But apparently Magnus swears by it.

                  Now a cutout back by the rear axle, after the CAT and S-pipe is still getting some backpressure jsut not alot as much as an entire cutout.

                  I am just saying my car varied, on the same night and actually track prep got worse as the night went one. And my car varied roughly .3-.4 tenths and 1-1.5 mph. Thats a huge difference with me, my times are usually within .05, of each other if I hook every launch. Most theoretical hp calculators would say that was a 30-40 hp difference, but I will be relative and say maybe it affected me buy roughly 10-15 hp.

                  [ February 03, 2003: Message edited by: MustangEater8251 ]</p>

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Oryan02:


                    Internals mostly. That and what kind of computer tuning are you doing?
                    <hr></blockquote>

                    Internal mods: they will be posted when the engine is done.
                    Computer tuning, technically I do not need any depending on my set up [img]smile.gif[/img]
                    I do however have superchips custom tuning to maximize what I use so far.
                    But I can use a combo of:
                    Superchips custom tuning
                    Bigger fuel pump
                    AFPR
                    Injectors (not like I'm changing those damn things!!!)
                    Nitrous and fuel jets

                    Depending on the results when it is done a DFI system is definately an option.
                    Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                    nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                    2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                    2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      My 3.4 always seemed to run better with the cutout open than it did when it was closed. Usually by about 1-2mph & a tenth or so.
                      2001 Onyx Black Camaro M5-Totalled<br />2005 Ford F150 XLT 5.4L<br /><br />\"To make peace, prepare for war.\"

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Fin:
                        My 3.4 always seemed to run better with the cutout open than it did when it was closed. Usually by about 1-2mph & a tenth or so.<hr></blockquote>

                        Where was the cutout located?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Damn Good question MustangEater. I would also like to know. :D
                          94 3.4L A4 white t-tops<br />moroso cai<br />3\"hi-flow pacestter exhaust<br />b&m shift kit<br />catco cat<br />01 T/A rear w/ 3.73\'s and posi<br />1 pc aluminum ds<br />blacked out signals

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I am jsut trying to say a car needs backpressure not that a cutout gives too much.

                            MY cutout gives a little too much freeflow, since it is directly on the Y-pipe, before the CAT, so its almost exactly like running a open y-pipe, jsut slighlty less free flowing.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              are all cut outs for a 3.4 in the same spot?

                              Sorry im clueless
                              94 3.4L A4 white t-tops<br />moroso cai<br />3\"hi-flow pacestter exhaust<br />b&m shift kit<br />catco cat<br />01 T/A rear w/ 3.73\'s and posi<br />1 pc aluminum ds<br />blacked out signals

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by cb1101:
                                are all cut outs for a 3.4 in the same spot?

                                Sorry im clueless
                                <hr></blockquote>

                                you can put a cutout where ever you tell the guy you want it.

                                Most cutouts on f-bodies are put on jsut before the rear axle, mine is right by the feet of the passenger seat, in front of the CAT

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                • Dongrossmd
                                  Throttle Position Sensor trouble shooting
                                  by Dongrossmd
                                  I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...
                                  2 weeks ago
                                • ssms5411
                                  New stereo
                                  by ssms5411
                                  Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...
                                  2 weeks ago

                                FORUM SPONSORS

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X