Tweet
While my times are not as impressive as Mike's overall, I did some research tuning on my 2002 and got some interesting results.
My fastest time on 93 octane w/ 93 programming:
60'........... 2.182
330........... 6.346
1/8........... 9.801 @ 70.97MPH
1/4........... 15.248 @ 91.01MPH
Fastest of day, 93octane, 87 Tuning:
60'........... 2.285
330........... 6.80
1/8........... 9.802 @ 71.65MPH :D
1/4........... 15.220 @ 91.37MPH :D
[img]graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]
For a stock 2002 M5 (stock exhaust, just lid/filter/stat really as only power mods) running P245 ES100s (I had em @ 20psi and still thats the best I could muster...) I'm pretty impressed. With traction my car would be good for 14 second passes STOCK [img]graemlins/evilgrin.gif[/img]
It also proves that the 87 octane tuning is not noticeably slower than the 93 tuning, in fact for me it was faster - I believe this was because of possible KR from the 93 tuning.
Overall, I'm thrilled, and can't wait to get a good exhaust on my car [img]smile.gif[/img] .
The only weight reductions were as follows:
1/4 Tank Fuel
Subwoofer, Jack, Spare, CDs, Tools
All Seats, carpeting, etc were left in the car and so was the big hairy amplifier [img]smile.gif[/img]
----------------------EDIT----------------------
I'd like to add that I got 32MPG on the way home and that as the car's coolant became cooler and cooler (i.e. the longer I let her sit between runs) the harder she pulled.
At roughly 200F the car was pulling 15.6-15.8, But at 160 I was in the 15.2 Range. Would anyone like to sell me their fan switch? :D
[ March 31, 2003: Message edited by: Dominic ]</p>
My fastest time on 93 octane w/ 93 programming:
60'........... 2.182
330........... 6.346
1/8........... 9.801 @ 70.97MPH
1/4........... 15.248 @ 91.01MPH
Fastest of day, 93octane, 87 Tuning:
60'........... 2.285
330........... 6.80
1/8........... 9.802 @ 71.65MPH :D
1/4........... 15.220 @ 91.37MPH :D
[img]graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]
For a stock 2002 M5 (stock exhaust, just lid/filter/stat really as only power mods) running P245 ES100s (I had em @ 20psi and still thats the best I could muster...) I'm pretty impressed. With traction my car would be good for 14 second passes STOCK [img]graemlins/evilgrin.gif[/img]
It also proves that the 87 octane tuning is not noticeably slower than the 93 tuning, in fact for me it was faster - I believe this was because of possible KR from the 93 tuning.
Overall, I'm thrilled, and can't wait to get a good exhaust on my car [img]smile.gif[/img] .
The only weight reductions were as follows:
1/4 Tank Fuel
Subwoofer, Jack, Spare, CDs, Tools
All Seats, carpeting, etc were left in the car and so was the big hairy amplifier [img]smile.gif[/img]
----------------------EDIT----------------------
I'd like to add that I got 32MPG on the way home and that as the car's coolant became cooler and cooler (i.e. the longer I let her sit between runs) the harder she pulled.
At roughly 200F the car was pulling 15.6-15.8, But at 160 I was in the 15.2 Range. Would anyone like to sell me their fan switch? :D
[ March 31, 2003: Message edited by: Dominic ]</p>
Comment