Tweet
could an n/a 3.4 get into the 14's? i'm really pissed that its so hard to get our cars to go fast without spending major bucks.
-
Red 94 Firebird 3.4L<br />-Flowmaster dual outlet exhaust system<br />-K&N cold air induction kit<br />-painted interior<br />-v8 when i get a real job -
With aftermarket heads/cam, a good suspension setup, a good tire, and maybe some weight reduction sure. I'm going to try to do it w/out the weight reduction.---<br />-\'95 3.4L M5 Camaro -
That's what I would like to do before going forced. Even if it was a 14.999 I would freak out with excitement. I know 3.4's can do this all motor, just no one here has done it. Maybe we should try magic dust, or pray our cars become factory freaks. :D As for now I'm working on getting to the 15's. Gears and lsd go on this weekend.1994 Chevrolet Camaro 3.4L A4 (160hp 200tq)<br />2006 Nissan 350Z 3.5L M6 (300hp 260tq)Comment
-
Yes it is very do-able to get a 3.4 N/A into the 14's. I'd say with heads, cam, gears, lsd, driveshaft, headers, intake, exhaust and a better torque converter if its an auto.\'95 Med. Quasar Blue Camaro 3.4 A4<br />Bunch o\' mods<br /><b>10.18 @ 67.60 mph 2.22 60 ft (1/8 mile)</b> <br /><br />-1986 Camaro with a carbed 350<br /><b>8.53 @ 81.45mph 1.8 60\'</b><br />AIM CamaroL32Comment
-
If you do it in an auto there's a good chance it would do it consistantly. [img]graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]1994 Chevrolet Camaro 3.4L A4 (160hp 200tq)<br />2006 Nissan 350Z 3.5L M6 (300hp 260tq)Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by CamaroL32:
Yes it is very do-able to get a 3.4 N/A into the 14's. I'd say with heads, cam, gears, lsd, driveshaft, headers, intake, exhaust and a better torque converter if its an auto.<hr></blockquote>
I should definetly be in the 14's after my rebuild , I have every mod listed there except a better torque converter. And I also have a Jet stage 2 chip , maybe that might help alot after the rebuild . Oh yeah , on the timeslips page it says Tim LeGros traped at 91 mph .Isnt that well good enough to get into the 14's ?? Maybe even to go as far as mid 14's ?
[ April 09, 2003: Message edited by: Ryan94V6 ]</p>2002 Grand Prix GTP- FWI Intake , flowmaster 40\'s ,3.4 pulley , and Intense racing PCM.<br />94 3.4L camaro -Lots of mods!Comment
-
I coulda done it , I still might when I build my new motor [img]smile.gif[/img]Comment
-
14's shouldn't be to hard,specally for people with the ssm or nrt heads ;)Wolf<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/249111/7\" target=\"_blank\">95 black t-top camaro</a>,3.4 5 speed,ud pullies,plugs/wires,de-shaft tb & gutted airbox, homemaid short throw shifterComment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>I should definetly be in the 14's after my rebuild , I have every mod listed there except a better torque converter. And I also have a Jet stage 2 chip , maybe that might help alot after the rebuild . Oh yeah , on the timeslips page it says Tim LeGros traped at 91 mph .Isnt that well good enough to get into the 14's ?? Maybe even to go as far as mid 14's ? <hr></blockquote>
You might want to look into some type of custom programming on the computer. I think that the jet chip would loose any gains it would have given you when you start adding the bigger stuff (cams, heads, headers)\'95 Med. Quasar Blue Camaro 3.4 A4<br />Bunch o\' mods<br /><b>10.18 @ 67.60 mph 2.22 60 ft (1/8 mile)</b> <br /><br />-1986 Camaro with a carbed 350<br /><b>8.53 @ 81.45mph 1.8 60\'</b><br />AIM CamaroL32Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by CamaroL32:
You might want to look into some type of custom programming on the computer. I think that the jet chip would loose any gains it would have given you when you start adding the bigger stuff (cams, heads, headers)<hr></blockquote>
Yeah, Im definetly gonna do a re-program on the Jet stage 2 chip.Im hoping for some big gains after the re-program.2002 Grand Prix GTP- FWI Intake , flowmaster 40\'s ,3.4 pulley , and Intense racing PCM.<br />94 3.4L camaro -Lots of mods!Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Ryan94V6:
Oh yeah , on the timeslips page it says Tim LeGros traped at 91 mph .Isnt that well good enough to get into the 14's ?? Maybe even to go as far as mid 14's ?
<hr></blockquote>
I was gonna say the same... If he build ran his car as good as I ran mine I am sure he coudl ahve gotten it.
I think with the setup I had and a littel more practice a 15.3 was doable out of my car...
I still have stock TB, Motor, computer, and exhaust manifolds.Comment
-
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by MustangEater8251:
I was gonna say the same... If he build ran his car as good as I ran mine I am sure he coudl ahve gotten it.
I think with the setup I had and a littel more practice a 15.3 was doable out of my car...
I still have stock TB, Motor, computer, and exhaust manifolds.<hr></blockquote>
Maybe his launch wasnt that great. I dunno , but that does sound like a good 14 sec car.2002 Grand Prix GTP- FWI Intake , flowmaster 40\'s ,3.4 pulley , and Intense racing PCM.<br />94 3.4L camaro -Lots of mods!Comment
-
I still have not ever seen in my last 5-6 years of watching these cars ever seen a 3.4 trap higher then mine, which was 88 mph, I don't know wtf up with TIm legro's run, dunno, just hard to swallow.......Comment
-
I hit an 87 mph once [img]smile.gif[/img]
Not sure, about Tim Legros if we had a 60" would be much better, any chance anyone can get in contact with him?
This is wierd, thinking back to how long I have looked at 3.4Ls I remember Tiago whn all your NRT stuff was on James Montigny's car before he even wrecked his car.Comment
-
my car will go 14's.
Once I trade it in and get my new one in june [img]smile.gif[/img]Comment
Comment