12.41@112 in the fairly stock LS1 Conversion - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

12.41@112 in the fairly stock LS1 Conversion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 12.41@112 in the fairly stock LS1 Conversion

    It was my first time at the track with the new engine.... first pass I ran 12.5@112 and was like, hell yea! [img]smile.gif[/img]

    I had 1 more 12.5 pas then 5 12.4 passes. Here's the best run:

    1.848 60'
    8.024@88.08 1/8
    12.417@112.51 1/4

    This is with a junk yard motor trans just dropped into the car.. the only thing I did to it was
    Added:
    160 thermo
    poly motor mounts
    K&N FIPK
    Removed:
    EGR, AIR Pump, EVAP, A/C

    I'd say that's pretty damn good for a stock engine/tranny/converter/manifolds/cats LS1. [img]smile.gif[/img]

    I need 1.2 seconds to get the fastest stock internal NA LS1 record... so with these mods, I think its VERY doable:
    Throttle Body
    LS6 Intake
    Pulley
    Long Tubes
    PT4400
    Slicks

    :D
    Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

  • #2
    That is badass
    97 firebird v6= killed by a gaurdrail.<p>new car= some kinda ls1 hopefully

    Comment


    • #3
      Does it still count with the LS6 intake? Just warning I could see some people argue that., nice runs though...

      I saw put a forget the intake and put a higher stall verter in there, and I assume you have most aftermarket suspension stuff still on your car right?

      Comment


      • #4
        LS6 intake counts.

        QTP LT's are on order.
        YPT4400 is on order, should be picked up this week.

        Stock V6 suspension up front, no swap bar.
        Rear stock V6 shocks, BMR LCA's, WS6 Take-off shocks.
        Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

        Comment


        • #5
          nice! [img]graemlins/omg.gif[/img]
          -Eric<br />2002 Navy Blue Camaro...Striped and Stalled. 35th Anniversary SS wheels <br />Best ET: 15.384 @ 88.32 on street tires<br />Project Whitney: Goal, 14.0 1/4 by summer 2008.

          Comment


          • #6
            Maybe youve found the secret to a fast Ls1, Ls1 motor and v6 suspension components [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] Dude that freaky you run that good, you should be maybe hitting 12's with that, not 12.4, badd-azz dude youve found a secret somewhere. [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img]
            Dont call me chief.<br /><br />2001 Camaro Convertible Rs Replica<br />1991 Acura Legend

            Comment


            • #7
              I was hoping for 12.8's@110 at least...

              12.4's.. bad *** .. 112mph even cooler. [img]smile.gif[/img]

              I was pulling a lot of LS1's on the big end. That felt really good. [img]smile.gif[/img]

              Thanks guys.

              BTW, I'm still struttin the Firebirdv6 banner and damn proud of it!!! :cool:
              Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

              Comment


              • #8
                AHve ya considered a torque arm? I think the beauty of the hard as launch with no spin makes for a lack of hp at tiems.

                Nice times though...

                Not so sure if its ls1 with v6 suspension maybe ls1 in light car [img]smile.gif[/img]

                Comment


                • #9
                  Torque arm might be one of the things i need to do. :(

                  Probably the weight reduction and great flowing intake. The K&N FIPK works REALLY well with the predator hood.
                  Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    is there much weight difference in the front ends when they changed them because the motor "wouldnt" fit [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img] Sorry i still laugh when i read the gm press letter saying they changed the front end cause the motor wouldnt fit. I can see amybe the 98+ camaro front end weighing more casue of the light assembly and the slightly largers panels But im not sure about the firebird.
                    Dont call me chief.<br /><br />2001 Camaro Convertible Rs Replica<br />1991 Acura Legend

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      the fastest stock internal LS1 is only 11.3?
                      2011 Camaro LS 6M, in black.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by navyblue2000:
                        the fastest stock internal LS1 is only 11.3?<hr></blockquote>

                        Yeah, no kidding thats what I was about to say. I think you need to do a little bit more reaserch on this. I've been to HRP a couple of times and seen some NA LS1's in the 10s.

                        Don't quote me on this but I think that the fastest LS1 NA times are in the low 10's-high 9's.

                        Either way those are some pretty mean times for a fairly stock LS1.

                        [ May 25, 2003: Message edited by: Redsix ]</p>
                        <b>Red 1999 Firebird M5</b><br />Whisper Lid,Borla Catback,K&N,Dual Friction Center Force Clutch,Hurst Shifter w/Lou\'s Short Stick,!FRA,Suncoast Ramair hood,160 Thermo,!maf,Chrome ZO6 Wheels, Painted Calipers, CIA Headers, Taylor Wires, NGK Spark Plugs, 3\" Catco, Jet Chip Stage II, BMR STB, LCA, PHR, SFC, Fan Switch, FTRA<br /><b>Old Dyno Numbers: 183 RWHP, 217 RWTRQ</b><br /><a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/redsixer\" target=\"_blank\">http://community.webshots.com/user/redsixer</a>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Redsix:


                          Yeah, no kidding thats what I was about to say. I think you need to do a little bit more reaserch on this. I've been to HRP a couple of times and seen some NA LS1's in the 10s.

                          Don't quote me on this but I think that the fastest LS1 NA times are in the low 10's-high 9's.

                          Either way those are some pretty mean times for a fairly stock LS1.

                          [ May 25, 2003: Message edited by: Redsix ]
                          <hr></blockquote>


                          are you sure those are stock internals?(no cams, heads..)
                          \'96 <b>Quasar Blue</b> Firebird A4<br /><a href=\"http://jamiethekiller@comcast.net\" target=\"_blank\"><i>jamiethekiller@comcast.net</i></a><br /><a href=\"http://www.woodlandrock.com\" target=\"_blank\">my band: woodland</a>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Good call, I didn't catch that. In that case 11.3 I guess sounds about right. Okay then. [img]graemlins/dunce.gif[/img]
                            <b>Red 1999 Firebird M5</b><br />Whisper Lid,Borla Catback,K&N,Dual Friction Center Force Clutch,Hurst Shifter w/Lou\'s Short Stick,!FRA,Suncoast Ramair hood,160 Thermo,!maf,Chrome ZO6 Wheels, Painted Calipers, CIA Headers, Taylor Wires, NGK Spark Plugs, 3\" Catco, Jet Chip Stage II, BMR STB, LCA, PHR, SFC, Fan Switch, FTRA<br /><b>Old Dyno Numbers: 183 RWHP, 217 RWTRQ</b><br /><a href=\"http://community.webshots.com/user/redsixer\" target=\"_blank\">http://community.webshots.com/user/redsixer</a>

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              11.3 still sounds slow to me, unless....

                              You count heads as "internals", which you shouldn’t.

                              And there are no other LS1s doing the weight reduction thing.

                              I know LS1s with a Head/cam that are full bodied street cars not even set up to drag are in the 11.30s and lower. (yeah yeah I know a cam is internal)

                              Either way congratulation, but I think that 1.3sec is going to be pretty hard to get.
                              I have made a lot of money in my life, most of which I spent on cars and women.<p>The rest I have blown.

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              There are no results that meet this criteria.

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X