Well, I used this calculator ( http://www.bgsoflex.com/shifter.html ) and got these results (I used the dynograph from the 205hp 3800)
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>
Computation Results
Using the Criterion for Maintaining the Same Horsepower Before and After Shift:
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 3.75 to 2.19:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6186, which achieves 157 horsepower and lowers the RPM To 3612 after shift
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 2.19 to 1.41:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6077, which achieves 167 horsepower and lowers the RPM To 3912 after shift
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 1.41 to 1.00:
Found optimum shift RPM at 5975, which achieves 177 horsepower and lowers the RPM To 4238 after shift
-----------------------------------------------------------
Maximizing the Area Under the Horsepower Curve:
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 3.75 to 2.19:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6250, which achieves maximum area under horsepower curve, and lowers the RPM to 3650 after shift
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 2.19 to 1.41:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6244, which achieves maximum area under horsepower curve, and lowers the RPM to 4020 after shift
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 1.41 to 1.00:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6246, which achieves maximum area under horsepower curve, and lowers the RPM to 4430 after shift
<hr></blockquote>
So which do I want to do? Maintain the same horespower or maximize the area under the curve?
Ugh, too much calculas :(
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>
Computation Results
Using the Criterion for Maintaining the Same Horsepower Before and After Shift:
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 3.75 to 2.19:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6186, which achieves 157 horsepower and lowers the RPM To 3612 after shift
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 2.19 to 1.41:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6077, which achieves 167 horsepower and lowers the RPM To 3912 after shift
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 1.41 to 1.00:
Found optimum shift RPM at 5975, which achieves 177 horsepower and lowers the RPM To 4238 after shift
-----------------------------------------------------------
Maximizing the Area Under the Horsepower Curve:
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 3.75 to 2.19:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6250, which achieves maximum area under horsepower curve, and lowers the RPM to 3650 after shift
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 2.19 to 1.41:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6244, which achieves maximum area under horsepower curve, and lowers the RPM to 4020 after shift
Finding Best Shift Placement Points For Ratio 1.41 to 1.00:
Found optimum shift RPM at 6246, which achieves maximum area under horsepower curve, and lowers the RPM to 4430 after shift
<hr></blockquote>
So which do I want to do? Maintain the same horespower or maximize the area under the curve?
Ugh, too much calculas :(
Comment