Welcome to the FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by SlowCamaro96: So you think launching at 2500 is too high??? What should I launch at? 2.3 not good 60' for stock? And what is up with the trap speed? I can only trap 86??? Ne1???<hr></blockquote>
My car cuts loose at 2500? about 2k is good
2000 Firebird. Whisper Lid, True duals, TSP mail order tune, Built Tranny , TCI 2800 stall verter, B&M tranny cooler, Eaton LSD, 3.42 gears. Current best ET. 15.232 89.09 MPH 2.175 60ft on stock 3.42\'s and open diff.<a href=\"http://www.geocities.c
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by 99CamaroV6: not the auto v6 f-bodies...go look on the time slips page. Every automatic with a similar ET to a manual traps a few MPH lower across the board. The reason for this isn't that the topend sucks but because the car lacks power from 40-55ish.<hr></blockquote>
No the reason is that 3rd gear in the manual pimp-slaps 3rd in the auto, even if you have 3.42's. The manual's 1.41:1 3rd gear gives them a significant torque multiplication advantage.
BTW, I have not felt this mystical powerloss from 40-55. I do however notice my car drop in acceleration fairly significantly when it hits 78 and shifts into 3rd.
<blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by HAZ-Matt:
No the reason is that 3rd gear in the manual pimp-slaps 3rd in the auto, even if you have 3.42's. The manual's 1.41:1 3rd gear gives them a significant torque multiplication advantage.
BTW, I have not felt this mystical powerloss from 40-55. I do however notice my car drop in acceleration fairly significantly when it hits 78 and shifts into 3rd.<hr></blockquote>
agreed but how do you explain the low 1/8th MPH traps that some of the A4s get like only 69ish stock on the 1/8th? I feel that shifting into third it dies too but that's after the 1/8th. My car does pick up strong again after 85 tho I must say.
Your 3rd is a gear I'm missing. Shift into 4th at 90ish (I think that's where it goes on the M5) and you're matched against my 3.42:1 gear and you have a 3.23:1 gear. :D See ya later biatch. lol
[img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]
[ October 06, 2003: Message edited by: 99CamaroV6 ]</p>
Hey guys. For starters I’ve always been a big car guy, I love all types of cars and can appreciate all types of engineering. I’ve always been a Chevy...
Hello every one, ozzy here ive been looking at this page for weeks now finally joined. So my question is why is it that every turbo build forum just ends...
2 weeks ago
FORUM SPONSORS
Collapse
Working...
X
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment