Why is our competition faster??? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is our competition faster???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    james, that's a small shot really, not enough to be considered hard core

    serveral guys have run 150-175 shots here before. It's your turn. ;)
    Keith - Chicago<br /><a href=\"http://www.hptuners.com\" target=\"_blank\">HP Tuners - PCM Reprogramming</a><br /><a href=\"http://www.dxsoftware.com/magnus/\" target=\"_blank\">97 Firebird V6 to LS1 swap</a><br /><b>V8 9.967@132.78</b> 1.322 60\' NA Heads/Cam<br /><b>V8 10.295@128.48</b> 1.363 60\' NA Cam Only<br /><b>V8 10.987@119.31</b> 1.422 60\' NA Stock Internals<br /><b>V6 13.674@98.22</b> NA<br /><b>V6 12.394@104.91</b> N20 100HP

    Comment


    • #17
      Stop playing around with street slicks, get some ET Drags and up the shot till she puts two 1s on the board. [img]smile.gif[/img] Youve already got another car to drive just in case. Have that driveshaft safety loop on good and tight!

      I think James is hardcore. He may not have the FASTEST time, but he has probably made more 12 sec passes than all of the others combined. I would like to see him suceede.

      Same with Shirl.

      One of the two of you will eventually do it.
      You both deserve it. Just hurry up already! :D

      [ September 19, 2003: Message edited by: AZ3.8Camaro ]</p>
      1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
      1997 Dodge Viper GTS

      Comment


      • #18
        <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Magnus:
        james, that's a small shot really, not enough to be considered hard core

        serveral guys have run 150-175 shots here before. It's your turn. ;)
        <hr></blockquote>


        I think he should focus on upping hte shot after he figures out how to get a good launch with the current setup. Need to drive the car to a perfect run before you start throughing more power into it imo.

        Comment


        • #19
          James could EASILY have 11s, EASILY!! and 13s NA. He just doesnt want 4.11's and a cam [img]tongue.gif[/img] Nor do I blame him, I believe the mustang owners have a better way to tune than we do. I so often hear of a fast v6 car with a cam, then it blows up. We just cant tune these cars and thats where are biggest problem is. IF we had a better way of tuning, 3.8edit? lolol We would have some much better times IMO
          im staying with a stock cam until we have a better way of tuning it, Because as of now there really is no way to tune them
          This revelation, is the death of ignorance...<br /><a href=\"http://www.quicktimeperformance.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.quicktimeperformance.com</a>

          Comment


          • #20
            Posted by AZ3.8Camaro: Same with Shirl.
            One of the two of you will eventually do it.
            You both deserve it. Just hurry up already!


            Thanks for the encouragement, it's really appreciated! [img]graemlins/love.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]
            2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
            1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
            2011 Cadillac CTS-V
            2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
            2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

            Comment


            • #21
              <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Magnus:

              serveral guys have run 150-175 shots here before. It's your turn. ;)
              <hr></blockquote>

              sure they have run 150-175 shts but my 100 shot has gone quicker [img]tongue.gif[/img]

              GIve it time..... shortly I will be back.

              All parts sit in my room waiting for install :D
              Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
              nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
              2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
              2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

              Comment


              • #22
                The V6 stangs are about to have another 11 second timeslip up top with a supercharged dood by the end of the month.

                I'd love to see a little more compitition. That will only make BOTH sides push to go faster.

                [ September 20, 2003: Message edited by: need4mospd ]</p>
                2000 V6 Mustang<br />Cammed, ported, and pimpin<br />13.927@97.67mph w/1.890 60ft

                Comment


                • #23
                  <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by need4mospd:
                  The V6 stangs are about to have another 11 second timeslip up top with a supercharged dood by the end of the month.

                  I'd love to see a little more compitition. That will only make BOTH sides push to go faster.

                  [ September 20, 2003: Message edited by: need4mospd ]
                  <hr></blockquote>


                  You probably mean, Dan Haga's Vortech intercooled 403rwhp V6 Stang. That's an awesome ride. But he's been having serious issue but once he gets it in track, I think he will get it in a low to mid 11 sec.

                  I do agree though with the previous post. Most of our hardcore guys are trading up for V8's or leaving. We only have James, Shirl, Taigo and Stephan, if he ever runs. Shame on me for not being hardcore, I can't afford it to break on me.

                  1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by Mighty Thor:
                    You probably mean, Dan Haga's Vortech intercooled 403rwhp V6 Stang. That's an awesome ride. But he's been having serious issue but once he gets it in track, I think he will get it in a low to mid 11 sec. <hr></blockquote>

                    Him too, I was actually talking about Milan. He already ran a 12.3 on street tires. He's going all out in a couple weeks i believe.

                    And there are rumors about Morana(www.moranav6racing.com) shooting for 10's in his superlight v6 fox.

                    Crazy stuff going on. And I'm still trying to hit 13's N/A. [img]graemlins/dunce.gif[/img]
                    2000 V6 Mustang<br />Cammed, ported, and pimpin<br />13.927@97.67mph w/1.890 60ft

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      My car is going to be seeing some pretty low numbers...I'm not going to say anything yet, because it's theoretical, but all in due time [img]graemlins/evilgrin.gif[/img]
                      <a href=\"http://pics.projectpredator.com/thumbnails.php?album=16\" target=\"_blank\">2003 Zinc Yellow Mustang GT</a> 1 of 701<br />ET : TBD<br />But our shenanigans are cheeky and fun! Yeah, and his shenanigans are cruel and tragic. Which... makes t

                      Comment

                      Latest Topics

                      Collapse

                      FORUM SPONSORS

                      Collapse
                      Working...
                      X