Control arms make you slower... - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Control arms make you slower...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Control arms make you slower...

    So last time out, on a hotter day, I ran a 12.11 @ 112 on a 1.69 60'. Since then I have added a 160* thermostat, a fan switch, a poly trans mount, subframe connectors, and control arms. Tonight, on a cooler day with about the same humidity, I ran a best of 12.2-something @ 112, with a 1.77 60'. So how is it that I do a bunch of suspension mods and run a whole tenth off on my 60'??? All night 1.77, 1.78, and a couple 2.0s! Maybe I should put the stock control arms back on and try again???
    -<i>Travis</i><br /><b>99 Trans Am, Pewter, A4</b> Forged, stalled, and cammed<br /><b>85 Buick Regal WH1 T-Type</b> It\'d be cool if it ran...<br /><b>94 Camaro 3.4, Teal, M5</b> The daily beater

  • #2
    Are you using street tires or some form of drag tires?

    You probably just need to learn how to launch your new setup.

    I am not saying you can't launch, because a 1.7 is still way better than my best 60', but I know when you change something, it takes a little while to get used to how it behaves.
    1997 Chevrolet Camaro v6 - 13.8@104MPH
    1997 Dodge Viper GTS

    Comment


    • #3
      subframe connectors added a little weight. the rear suspension is now stiffer than it was, which might be the reason behind the lower 60 ft. time. perhaps something else contributed. I wouldn't worry. ur 1/4 time is still very fast and ur 60 ft. didn't go up too much. just keep at it and maybe u need to re-learn how to launch the car. like 3.8camaro said.
      2001 Arctic White Firebird<br />More mods than I\'m allowed to list!

      Comment


      • #4
        Thats nothign to sweat, that small of a difference could be bad track prep. Also might take some getting used to launching harder.

        Comment


        • #5
          Still damn good times! I'm thinking the humidity had a say in it. You're ET's/mph were pretty much the same.
          2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
          1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
          2011 Cadillac CTS-V
          2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
          2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

          Comment


          • #6
            i slowed down my first about 4 passes w/the new suspension, i put a TA and poly bushings in the LCA's and PHR, i normally ran 15.8's at this track w/stock setup and my first 4 passes i couldtn even run a 16, then i lowered my tire PSI to 31 lbs. and ended up running a 15.74 which is .13 quicker than my old best w/street tires in the summer, then this past weekend i bettered it to a 15.50 which is better than i ran in March, so keep practicing on the launch, it'll come around...
            <b>Black</b> 1998 Pontiac <i>Firebird</i> A-4 swap<br />271.4rwhp/259.4rwtq NA<br />13.30@102.44 <br /><a href=\"http://www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98\" target=\"_blank\">www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98</a>

            Comment


            • #7
              There was a bit of sarcasm is the title of the thread. I know it wasn't the control arms that slowed me down. I've always run better times when hotlapping my car... the 160* thermostat might have done it for me. Might be going back to the 195* soon.
              -<i>Travis</i><br /><b>99 Trans Am, Pewter, A4</b> Forged, stalled, and cammed<br /><b>85 Buick Regal WH1 T-Type</b> It\'d be cool if it ran...<br /><b>94 Camaro 3.4, Teal, M5</b> The daily beater

              Comment

              Latest Topics

              Collapse

              FORUM SPONSORS

              Collapse
              Working...
              X