hp calculators? - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

hp calculators?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • hp calculators?

    you guys know of any good ones?

    I looked at a few all over the net...

    based off of ET I they all say about 240ish, and off of mph 250ish...


    any others you guys reccomend because these numbers seeem a bit inflated...

  • #2
    i have a formula that is pretty close to accurate normally, you take the ET/5.825, then cube that number, then take the weightofcar/the cubed number, so a 14.46 at 3400lbs(guess), it took 222.8hp to run that quick
    <b>Black</b> 1998 Pontiac <i>Firebird</i> A-4 swap<br />271.4rwhp/259.4rwtq NA<br />13.30@102.44 <br /><a href=\"http://www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98\" target=\"_blank\">www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98</a>

    Comment


    • #3
      My raceweight was probably more...

      my 3.4L weighed a best of 3160 full interieo, this car has more options, bigger motor. So I assume 3300, I weigh 300, so 3600.

      I got 234.99 hp near that 240 mark...

      do you have one off of mph, that seems to be a better calculator on average, at least from what I woudl understand.

      Comment


      • #4
        http://home.att.net/~khandlon/hpcal.html

        I have to tinker w/ the weight to get probably a more acturate rwhp number, but gives you a good idea.
        Keith - 99 'maro - White M5 - bumpstick and boltons - 13.65 @ 101 N/A
        "I ain't too big to listen to the rumors, I'm just too @#$% big to pay attention to them" - Dr. Dre
        http://seppo.hopto.org/

        Comment


        • #5
          i had another one for MPH but i cant find it...
          <b>Black</b> 1998 Pontiac <i>Firebird</i> A-4 swap<br />271.4rwhp/259.4rwtq NA<br />13.30@102.44 <br /><a href=\"http://www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98\" target=\"_blank\">www.freewebs.com/wickedsix98</a>

          Comment


          • #6
            yeah that one estimates...

            Based on ET
            237.60 rear wheel hp
            273.24 flyeheel hp :rolleyes: I wish

            MAsed on MPH
            247.50 rear wheel hp
            284.11 flywheel hp :rolleyes: again...


            It estimated my car as 3640...

            Comment


            • #7
              I took off the 40 lbs for spare and jack...

              only dropped my hp about 3-5 hp.


              DO you guys really think its like that? Even I think its a little high, I know these things are just "ballparkish" but damn....

              I really wanna get a weight on my car...

              Comment


              • #8
                i like to use www.prestage.com
                one thing to remember though, use a calculator that uses your trap speed to figure out your hp. that is the measure of power you get at the track.
                ET is a function of how well your chassis and gearing are working more than power. if your car hooks perfectly you can get a reasonable idea from et, but mph will yield the more accurate answer.

                later
                tim
                NJ SPEEDER<br />1976 Camaro LT<br />Crate 350, TH350, 3.90 posi<br />New Jersey F-Body Owners Association<br /><a href=\"http://www.NJFBOA.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.NJFBOA.org</a>

                Comment


                • #9
                  <blockquote>quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by njspder:
                  i like to use www.prestage.com
                  one thing to remember though, use a calculator that uses your trap speed to figure out your hp. that is the measure of power you get at the track.
                  ET is a function of how well your chassis and gearing are working more than power. if your car hooks perfectly you can get a reasonable idea from et, but mph will yield the more accurate answer.

                  later
                  tim
                  <hr></blockquote>


                  Yeah that is why I asked for a mp[h calculator...

                  either way yours came up with 241 hp

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I dont know, I guess my 3.4L has about 185 flywheel horse with just exhaust and intake (a few suspension mods)...

                    I dont think I gained 25 horse with just that, maybe subtract 10 hp... haha i dont think it's that accurate.

                    Estimated vehicle weight : 3481, seems somewhat accurate.
                    <a href=\"http://home.comcast.net/~beer13oy/carpage.html\" target=\"_blank\"><b>1995 3.4 Liter M5 Camaro</b></a><br />A few mods...<br />still slow.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.mnfbody.com\" target=\"_blank\">Minnesota F-body</a>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      WOW, first time I feel one of these were kinda close
                      I entered:
                      210 lbs for driver
                      550 lbs weight reduction from stock 3450
                      (Best race weight was 2950)
                      ET 12.48
                      MPH 110.95
                      A4 tranny

                      Calculated:
                      estimated weight 2971
                      RWHP per ET 302.10
                      RWHP per MPH 316.69

                      I have put down 315 RWHP like 2 years ago.

                      First time one of these were close, hmmm
                      Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                      nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                      2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                      2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        meow
                        ~The Guru\'s Guru~<br />1999 Camaro,K&N,!MAF<br />!airsilencer,3.08s,<br />NGK-TR6\'s,Taylor Blue 8mm wires,FRAM,A4,Catco Cat, Magnaflow 3 inch catback,transgo shift kit<br />Waiting: RK sport headers, custom y pipe electric cutout<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/divinejc\" target=\"_blank\">www.cardomain.com/id/divinejc</a>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Most calculators are ego inflators. They are old and simply do not consider aerodynamics.

                          Using those calulators, two vehicles, one being a truck @ 3500 lbs and the other a f-body @ 3500 lbs both run 14.0@100 MPH. Are they both going to make 273 RWHP? No, not at all.

                          It works out that the truck is making near 273 rwhp and the f-body is making near 244 rwhp.

                          Take my wife's 99 V6 Mustang. It made 167 rwhp and ran 15.3's@91 MPH. Using the old calculators, it would have made near 188 rwhp. If it made near 188 rwhp, the car would have went almost 95 mph with the car weighing @ 3200 race weight, which it does weigh.

                          I would bet your 3.8L weighs with you in at 3500 lbs. I would bet you make around 212 rwhp @ that weight.

                          For newer aerodynamic cars, use 5.63 instead of 5.825 and 243 instead of 234.
                          2003 Lightning 12.618@112.80<br />1996 Camaro Z28 11.751@115.96 MPH soon stupid fast!<br />1999 Mustang V6 15.36@90.92 MPH<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/\" target=\"_blank\">1996 Camaro Z28</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/Melissa_V6_Mustang\" target=\"_blank\">1999 Mustang V6</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/Ford_svt_lightning\" target=\"_blank\">2003 Lightning</a>

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I came up with 409 and 399rwhp on prestage.com [img]graemlins/popcorn.gif[/img]
                            2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
                            1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
                            2011 Cadillac CTS-V
                            2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
                            2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

                            Comment

                            Latest Topics

                            Collapse

                            There are no results that meet this criteria.

                            FORUM SPONSORS

                            Collapse
                            Working...
                            X