First off, the things everyone knows: chrome moly IS lighter (about 25lbs on a 6pt bar) and cost about twice as much. Chrome moly is a stronger material.
Now, why would one choose a steel bar over a CM one? Money of course for one. Here's another reason I may be passing on the CM bar... Chrome moly tubing is obviously much stronger than the mild steel tubing, but in effect, that makes it more brittle. On a street driven car (my daily driver), I'm worried that a CM bar, being less resistant to the flex which would have to occur in driving around every day on the streets, would eventually crack. The mild steel bar on the other hand, would be much more apt to absorb the flex and not weaken the bar.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
Now, why would one choose a steel bar over a CM one? Money of course for one. Here's another reason I may be passing on the CM bar... Chrome moly tubing is obviously much stronger than the mild steel tubing, but in effect, that makes it more brittle. On a street driven car (my daily driver), I'm worried that a CM bar, being less resistant to the flex which would have to occur in driving around every day on the streets, would eventually crack. The mild steel bar on the other hand, would be much more apt to absorb the flex and not weaken the bar.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
Comment