Why were my timeslips never added to the timeslip page?

[Magnus]

Originally posted by Jerriko:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mighty Thor:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Jerriko:
when I still had the 2.8L and auto in the car, I got it to run 15.67 @ 85.1.

Holly, that's the fastest 2.8 I know. I would be happy if my 2.8 could do that.

That is a timeslip worthy. </font>[/QUOTE]About that timeslip in the post that is long since dead, Magnus called me a liar and said that the timeslip was a fake. :rolleyes: Yep, that's it, I have a fake timeslip machine. :rolleyes:
I guess that's why I'm so skeptical about this new timeslip not being added. </font>[/QUOTE]I doubt I called you a liar. Standard protocol was to ask for proof to back up the timeslip. I received may timeslips that were false.

You work for a superior competitor? huh?

[Jerriko]

Originally posted by Magnus:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Jerriko:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Mighty Thor:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Jerriko:
when I still had the 2.8L and auto in the car, I got it to run 15.67 @ 85.1.

Holly, that's the fastest 2.8 I know. I would be happy if my 2.8 could do that.

That is a timeslip worthy. </font>[/QUOTE]About that timeslip in the post that is long since dead, Magnus called me a liar and said that the timeslip was a fake. :rolleyes: Yep, that's it, I have a fake timeslip machine. :rolleyes:
I guess that's why I'm so skeptical about this new timeslip not being added. </font>[/QUOTE]I doubt I called you a liar. Standard protocol was to ask for proof to back up the timeslip. I received may timeslips that were false.

</font>[/QUOTE]So what good is a timeslip then? First you ask for one and then I sent it to you numerous times. But you think its fake? So what is the point of even having a timeslip. What next, do I need to get it on video too. But, oh, that can be edited.
"You work for a superior competitor? huh?"
Sure, but I'm not going to advertise for free. I don't want to get kicked off of the boards like you had us kicked out in Ohio. :rolleyes:

[Magnus]

I do not handle the timeslips page anymore but I strongly urge the person who is handling it to screen carefuly.

I have asked many of the top dogs for better proof including a list of eye witnesses. It is all for the forum and the timeslips page. It is not to be a "hard ***".

I remember one time I questioned a 3.4 owner and requested more proof. After a storm of crying on this forum and others about how I could ask for more evidence, they finally left without providing any more proof that the times where legit.

You see, honest people have no problem providing proof when asked for. It seems those that can't supply it, or are trying to pull a fast one on the community usually ***** and moan.

Take care!

[Jerriko]

Ok, you mention more proof.
FOR THE LAST TIME, what else would you like then? You keep mentioning that you want more proof but you don't mention any ways that you would except. You mentioned a list of witnesses? I know only a couple people in IL that are on these boards and chances of us being at the same track on the same day are not good. What other proof could be offered to appease the mighty gods? What are you going to do when I get it tuned and running in the 13s? But wait, I have a hell of an idea. Since you live in Chicago, we could just meet at Joliet or wherever and you could see it first hand. Perhaps I could bring some of my buds from DHP also to keep everyone 'honest'. You don't have to keep making up excuses about why any of my timeslips were never posted. I know the real reason. :mad: [img]graemlins/twak.gif[/img]

[Magnus]

Jerriko. I do not run the timeslips page anymore. Proving the validity of your times to me serves no purpose.

I havent managed the timeslips page in over half a year now.

When i DID run the timeslips page, I usually requested a complete mods list, vehicle weight, weather, and some history.. Scanning timeslips that show a progression toward a time is a huge way to show that you actually did make it to the time you claim. Videos always work. Having friends able to chime in as well is a good thing too.

There is no real need for most users to provide extra evidence of their submitted times. It's usually only needed when there is a new top dog or when a timeslip is submitted that doesn't fit with the standard V6 timeslip form. For example, if the 1/8th mile doesn't match up with the 1/4 mile for a typical V6 at that speed it raises an eyebrow. Another thing that I watched for was quick ET's with terrible 60's.

But anyway, its not my call. I have zero input and authority over the current timeslips page.

[WishIHad$$$]

Originally posted by Magnus:


I have asked many of the top dogs for better proof including a list of eye witnesses.

Infernal himself saw me do my 15.14 at ais, and he still didn't add me to the timeslips page [img]graemlins/rofl.gif[/img]

[Jerriko]

Originally posted by Magnus:
Jerriko. I do not run the timeslips page anymore. Proving the validity of your times to me serves no purpose.

What? You just said that having witnesses would help. It doesn't matter if you run the page anymore, you would be a witness.

[Magnus]

I don't know why your times haven't been added. You'll have to talk to the person that is in charge of the timeslips page, that person is not me.

It would have helped when _I_ ran the page, which I do not anymore. It's not my call and I have zero say in the matter.

[Jerriko]

Originally posted by Magnus:
I don't know why your times haven't been added. You'll have to talk to the person that is in charge of the timeslips page, that person is not me.

It would have helped when _I_ ran the page, which I do not anymore. It's not my call and I have zero say in the matter.

Actually, no you didn't. The first time I submitted times that I ran using the 2.8L was last year. You were running the page. I submitted the time. You did nothing. I started a topic like this in this forum. You asked for a timeslip. I sent you one. You said the claim was far fetched and that was the last I heard of it. You didn't ask for any other proof. You simply disregarded my hardwork of getting that car to run 15.67@85.1 w/ the 2.8L. But that's water under the bridge. It's not so important to have the times listed on the timeslip page. And does anyone think that one reason why we have people in imports and cavaliers laughing at us is because of the times on that page? You make it so hard for the quicker times to be listed so everyone who looks at it ASSUMES that the times listed are the quickest ones.

[hawgs]

Get a life Jerrycurl, stop b*tching and moaning. :rolleyes:

Like Keith said... he has no control over the timeslip page now, why are you still b*tching about it to him? Instead of wasting your time posting on here why not send Infernal an email concerning this?

You're preaching to the choir on this... talk to someone that can actually do something about it.

[Clark Griswold]

[Magnus]

I added Shirls record to the timeslips page without a timeslip or extra proof. That knocked me off of the top dawg spot back in the day.

People who have a reputation of not *****ing and moaning tend to receive better responses.

Shirl is a well respected member of this forum and has proven herself and her car time and time again. It is not very difficult at all for respectable people to have incredible timeslips posted.

[Jerriko]

Wow, now its come down to name calling. Ok, sure I'll sink down to your level. Thanks for your intelligent response, as usual. The only thing I b*tched about to Fagnus was about something HE did. Not about the current situation. But don't try to get me to believe that he doesn't have any influence. Come on, DHP has been trying to become a sponsor for firebirdv6.com for quite some time now but for some reason, the emails NEVER get returned. But Hogs, you're just an a**hole so why do I care about your response (or lack of).

Then, magnus, you said that people who don't b*tch and moan get better responses. Considering that I didn't b*tch and moan until AFTER you called me a liar, what did I do before that that prompted you to not except my timeslip, back in the day?

I wish someone would have told me sooner when I became a 'unrespectable member of this community'. But now that I know, I will just have to keep up the b*tching and moaning!
[img]graemlins/popcorn.gif[/img]

[ July 15, 2004, 04:12 PM: Message edited by: Jerriko ]

[Magnus]

Dude, that was over a year ago. Get over it.

Who knows how many timeslips I was processing at the time or what else I had going on my life.

That has zero affect on your timeslips and how you submit them today. It is out of my jurisdiction.

I highly doubt I called you a liar as well. All of the bogus slips I received, I tried to respond to as fairly as possible without flat out saying "you're a liar".

[Jerriko]

I am over it. I'm just bored! But yes, some of the actual words used were 'liar' and 'far-fetched'. I am happy to now that a 15.67@85.1 w/ a 2.8L is INCREDIBLE!