Tweet
I had submitted it a long time ago (months) and I see it's still not up there. I had attached a copy of the timeslip to make it legit. The real problem I have with this is that when I still had the 2.8L and auto in the car, I got it to run 15.67 @ 85.1. I had submitted that time (with timeslip) also and that was never added either. [img]graemlins/bs.gif[/img] I know Magnus had stepped down and he was replaced so everything would happen quicker but come on. I hope this isn't some lameo stunt on Magnus's part since he knows I work for a superior competitor.
-
-
might have been lost in the shuffle of changing Mods.....just resubmit it please.Past Ride
1995 Firebird A4 3.8 Turbocharged -- 12.50 at 108
(If you dont know me, you haven't had a V6 long enough)
Current Ride
2006 Mitsubishi Evolution GSR
www.myspace.com/shane1015 -
I've submit mine twice too!
1 mounth ago and yesterday!99\' Camaro M5 3.23 LSD<br />-SLP CAI,K&N,Whisper Lid,!MAF Screen<br />-2\'5 Flowmaster Catback <br />-BMR STB<br />-Kumho 712 supra 245/50/16<br /> <a href=\"http://www.camaroV6.fr\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.camaroV6.fr</a>Comment
-
Holly, that's the fastest 2.8 I know. I would be happy if my 2.8 could do that.Originally posted by Jerriko:
when I still had the 2.8L and auto in the car, I got it to run 15.67 @ 85.1.
That is a timeslip worthy.
1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GTComment
-
Holly, that's the fastest 2.8 I know. I would be happy if my 2.8 could do that.Originally posted by Mighty Thor:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Jerriko:
when I still had the 2.8L and auto in the car, I got it to run 15.67 @ 85.1.
That is a timeslip worthy. </font>[/QUOTE]About that timeslip in the post that is long since dead, Magnus called me a liar and said that the timeslip was a fake. :rolleyes: Yep, that's it, I have a fake timeslip machine. :rolleyes:
I guess that's why I'm so skeptical about this new timeslip not being added.Comment
-
hehe...
your timeslips still hasn't been added?!?! Hell I think you added your timeslip before I added like my 14.6 last december.
I know someone local that ran a high 15 in a 2.8L... Your time doesn't seem not doable...Comment
-
:rolleyes:Originally posted by MustangEater8251:
hehe...
your timeslips still hasn't been added?!?! Hell I think you added your timeslip before I added like my 14.6 last december.
I know someone local that ran a high 15 in a 2.8L... Your time doesn't seem not doable...
Yeah, Magnus told me that he wasn't going to add the 2.8L timeslip since it was 'far fetched'.
:mad:Comment
-
Your sig says 3.4. Do you have two cars? Or did you sell the 2.8?Comment
-
if you check out his page, there were some "extenuating circumstances" that convinced him to do a swap.Comment
-
-
Whats funny is most people that discredit your times have 3.8Ls, and have never owned a 60* v6.
They have nothing to be threatened if your times are posted or not.Comment
-
Wait, if Magnus stepped down who is doing the timeslips page now?-Eric<br />2002 Navy Blue Camaro...Striped and Stalled. 35th Anniversary SS wheels <br />Best ET: 15.384 @ 88.32 on street tires<br />Project Whitney: Goal, 14.0 1/4 by summer 2008.Comment
-
InfernalComment
-
mines' been about a week so far...that's probably fair though. i didn't even know there was a personnel change [img]smile.gif[/img]1997 silver Camaro RS<br />|T-Type Powered|<br /><a href=\"http://www.kwfbody.com\" target=\"_blank\">Looking for a local F-Body club in K/W, Ontario, Canada?</a>Comment
-
up to like 2-3 months now here :S
--mattComment
-
I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...2 weeks ago -
Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...2 weeks ago
Comment