Proving the "Very Stubborn Firebird Hater" wrong... - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Proving the "Very Stubborn Firebird Hater" wrong...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by 02PewterBird:

    So the more power a car has the more the tires spin, making more powerful cars slower?
    To an idiot driver, sure. If you bother to read everything I wrote, you will notice I say a more skilled driver is needed to NOT spin the tires of a car with a manual. Not to mention that I was talking about the amount of power going to the rear wheels, not the amount of power the car generates. Please learn to read. [img]graemlins/twak.gif[/img]

    And Viper, I am glad to know that you have 3 feet. :D Besides, line locks should be used on any car if you do a lot of power braking. It tends to eat up the rear brakes.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Jerriko:
      </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by 02PewterBird:

      So the more power a car has the more the tires spin, making more powerful cars slower?
      To an idiot driver, sure. If you bother to read everything I wrote, you will notice I say a more skilled driver is needed to NOT spin the tires of a car with a manual. Not to mention that I was talking about the amount of power going to the rear wheels, not the amount of power the car generates. Please learn to read. [img]graemlins/twak.gif[/img]

      And Viper, I am glad to know that you have 3 feet. :D Besides, line locks should be used on any car if you do a lot of power braking. It tends to eat up the rear brakes.
      </font>[/QUOTE]ehh one foot for clutch and use other for brake and gas
      www.turbov6camaro.com
      1997 3800 Series II Camaro
      4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
      7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
      11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by viper04af:
        ehh one foot for clutch and use other for brake and gas
        That just doesn't sound smart but its your car. Don't be cheap, buy a line lock and save your rear brakes.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Jerriko:
          </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by viper04af:
          ehh one foot for clutch and use other for brake and gas
          That just doesn't sound smart but its your car. Don't be cheap, buy a line lock and save your rear brakes. </font>[/QUOTE]how is it not smart, put one foot and push on the brake and roll it over to hit the gas, lol should not need WOT unless you got slick back there
          www.turbov6camaro.com
          1997 3800 Series II Camaro
          4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
          7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
          11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by viper04af:
            why is TC better then a clutch?

            and a manule can get any 3.42 also, and better clutches. so please explain this to me, also why are all the major drag racers manule and not auto if thay are so much better?
            Actually, they are a modification of an auto.

            Typically, manual cars TRAP high MPH's than auto's
            Manual cars are great for autocrossing

            Auto's seem to be better for drag racing 1/4 mile.

            I am making a VERY generic statement... but auto seems to be more favorable for the 1/4 and 1/8 mile track's
            Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
            nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
            2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
            2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by 12secondv6:
              </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by viper04af:
              why is TC better then a clutch?

              and a manule can get any 3.42 also, and better clutches. so please explain this to me, also why are all the major drag racers manule and not auto if thay are so much better?
              Actually, they are a modification of an auto.

              Typically, manual cars TRAP high MPH's than auto's
              Manual cars are great for autocrossing

              Auto's seem to be better for drag racing 1/4 mile.

              I am making a VERY generic statement... but auto seems to be more favorable for the 1/4 and 1/8 mile track's
              </font>[/QUOTE]put it this way

              if you could make 2 cars exalcy the same exact same power ect (i know impossible but if it could happen)
              only 1 was M5 and the other a A4. and only the best drivers, running the car say 100 times, what car is goign to have lowest avg. et?
              www.turbov6camaro.com
              1997 3800 Series II Camaro
              4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
              7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
              11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

              Comment


              • #37
                Good point.....but

                Auto owner will NEVER miss a gear, manual driver can

                Auto driver's drivetrain sucks more power through drivetrain loss

                19-21 % driveline loss with an auto
                15-17 % driveline loss with a manual

                I understand your point... but also factor in what I said too [img]smile.gif[/img]
                Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                Comment


                • #38
                  so the m5 trap speed is higher, what exacly does that mean ? better top end right?
                  www.turbov6camaro.com
                  1997 3800 Series II Camaro
                  4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
                  7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
                  11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by viper04af:
                    so the m5 trap speed is higher, what exacly does that mean ? better top end right?
                    yes, m5 will have more top end because the is less drivetrain loss. For the common driver, autos are must easier to launch and more consistant.
                    92 S10 3800 A4(96)<br />1/4: 14.374 @ 92.25 w/ 1.976 60\'<br />Turbo and 12\'s Coming Soon!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by viper04af:
                      so the m5 trap speed is higher, what exacly does that mean ? better top end right?
                      Typically, yes.

                      Take a look at our timeslips page, mostly all manuals trap higher than auto's

                      Combination of slightly different internal gearing and less loss of power through drivetrane
                      Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                      nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                      2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                      2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by 12secondv6:
                        </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by viper04af:
                        so the m5 trap speed is higher, what exacly does that mean ? better top end right?
                        Typically, yes.

                        Take a look at our timeslips page, mostly all manuals trap higher than auto's

                        Combination of slightly different internal gearing and less loss of power through drivetrane
                        </font>[/QUOTE]i guess i dont get how yo can trap higher and still have the same ET. i know the 60' matters alot.... i just dont see how it all ties in

                        umm what about 1/8 mile do we trap higher there too?
                        www.turbov6camaro.com
                        1997 3800 Series II Camaro
                        4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
                        7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
                        11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by viper04af:
                          how is it not smart, put one foot and push on the brake and roll it over to hit the gas, lol should not need WOT unless you got slick back there
                          How doesn't that sound smart?
                          While you have the brake pedal pressed down, the brakes try to engage. Of course the front ones lock, but the rear ones still try to clamp down. Spinning the tires while the rear brakes try to lock glazes the rear brakes, causes excessive heat and wear that will damage the brake system. How does that sound smart?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            yeah man you should definitely be in the 15s with 3.42s ...try using a cutout to open up that exhaust before the cat...makes a big difference...did for me anyway...unless he wants you to go COMPLETELY factory (sorry i missed the earlier post) ..in that case...good luck!!
                            <b>12 SECOND DUAL STAGE DRY NITROUS POWERED 98 A4 V6 CAMARO<br /><a href=\"http://www.mysickcamaro.50megs.com\" target=\"_blank\">www.MySickCamaro.50megs.com</a><br />Best ET: 12.82@103<br />Best MPH: 104.7<br />Best 60\': 1.75 - Stock TC</b><br /> </font><blockquote><font size=\"1\" face=\"Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif\">quote:</font><hr /><font size=\"2\" face=\"Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif\">Originally posted by Shodown:<br /><strong>1DV6 runs 12\'s...enough said. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size=\"2\" face=\"Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif\">

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Jerriko:
                              </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by viper04af:
                              how is it not smart, put one foot and push on the brake and roll it over to hit the gas, lol should not need WOT unless you got slick back there
                              How doesn't that sound smart?
                              While you have the brake pedal pressed down, the brakes try to engage. Of course the front ones lock, but the rear ones still try to clamp down. Spinning the tires while the rear brakes try to lock glazes the rear brakes, causes excessive heat and wear that will damage the brake system. How does that sound smart?
                              </font>[/QUOTE]for every fun reaction theres chance of a expensive ehhhh you know but still i don't do it like everyday (kinda hard when im 4000 miles from the car lol
                              www.turbov6camaro.com
                              1997 3800 Series II Camaro
                              4600 Stall for my ride to the mall :chug:
                              7.18 @ 99.77 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
                              11.23 @ unk 5 1/4 - 7.19 1/8 - 1.83 sixty

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Guys are so off the topic.

                                What's the result already?

                                1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

                                Comment

                                Latest Topics

                                Collapse

                                FORUM SPONSORS

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X