I wouldn't say the top end of an lt1 sucks compared to the ls1. Build both motor to the same specs and see who takes who out of the hole [img]smile.gif[/img]
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
93 Z28
Collapse
X
-
well stock for stock the lt1 isnt close vs. the ls1. like i said i has the low end grunt to get you off the line quick but up top its not as good. the lt1s power band isnt as wide as the ls1s. ls1s from a roll of like 60 or so will own lt1s.
current car- 95 Trans am- bolt ons, parked and collecting dust. why? because **** it
Follow me!
http://www.twitch.tv/optimusprymrib
Or this
Comment
-
Don't get a 93, they're a ***** to tune, get a 94\'99 SSM Camaro V6 M5<br />(mod list on cardomain site; too long to list here)<br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/v6cam99\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/id/v6cam99</a>
Comment
-
If I do get this car its because it seems like a cheap price. I would happily get an LS1 but I dont have the money. Until I have the money please stop comparing the LS1 to the LT1.
I am going to go see the car tomorrow. :D95 Camaro 3.4 convertible<br />95 Nissan Sentra GXE Twin Cam
Comment
-
Go to www.speeddensity.org and ask around about the '93 F-Bodies.
I have two friends that own(ed) them, and they both love them. The speed density setup is a bit more work to tune, but the guys on the above website are extremely helpful. Give the car a very good look over before you decide to buy....
- Justin<a href=\"http://www.njfboa.org\" target=\"_blank\">New Jersey F-Body Owners Association</a><br />1987 Camaro LT - 400sbc, Aluminum L98\'s w/valve job, Comp XE 274, Q-Junk 750, 3.23 posi, 4.10\'s soon.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.njfboa.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=11\" target=\"_blank\">East Coast F-Body Nationals - August 14, 2005</a>
Comment
-
Originally posted by 12secondv6:
I'd prob take an LT1 over an LS1 due to low end grunt... us nitrous people prefer low end grunt!
Speed density rules if its tuned right.Turbocharged and intercooled.<br />17psi(oops), stock fuel pump, no FMU<br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/phoenix64\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/id/phoenix64</a> <br />Video: <a href=\"ftp://ftp.pfabrication.com\" target=\"_blank\">ftp://ftp.pfabrication.com</a> Assorted car ****: TurboCamaroFull.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FireFighter:
plugs, wires, coils, fuel filter, air filter, PCV, Oil change and filter, Trans filter and flush(if its an auto). Thats all I can think of right now.Jeff ..
1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold
2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Comment
-
Originally posted by 12secondv6:
I'd prob take an LT1 over an LS1 due to low end grunt... us nitrous people prefer low end grunt!Jeff ..
1998 Firebird.. Built 3.8 with a 125 shot.. 370rwhp,415rwtq.. stock tune!! sold
2002 WS6 T/A.. Bolt ins..448rwhp
2009 G8 GT.. Vararam intake, GXP axleback
1998 Corvette.. Vararam intake, Ti axleback
http://www.fquick.com/slow-v6
Comment
-
Also don't forget that LT1 parts are way cheaper than LS1 parts, if you plan on modding.
- Justin<a href=\"http://www.njfboa.org\" target=\"_blank\">New Jersey F-Body Owners Association</a><br />1987 Camaro LT - 400sbc, Aluminum L98\'s w/valve job, Comp XE 274, Q-Junk 750, 3.23 posi, 4.10\'s soon.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.njfboa.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=11\" target=\"_blank\">East Coast F-Body Nationals - August 14, 2005</a>
Comment
-
As an added bonus, we also remove the antenna to reduce aerodynamic drag. step 3 that thread is halarious, and yes go for the car. then put a for sale sign on it for $3500. drive it and if it sells then woohoo. my friend has his firebird and got it for 1100. its a daily driver and is a very nice car with all the options96 Camaro 3.8 A4 Basemodel: 8 mm wires, Shift Kit, Hollowed <br />Cat(o2 sims), RKSport exhaust, IAT 5.6K resistor, Home Depot CAI<br />>>>15.375 @ 89.27<<<NEW BEST TIME <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/552491\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/552491</a>
Comment
-
1993 LT1 were speed density cars, as pointed out.
This makes tuning them are challenge, a real challenge to the self tuners out there.
But a big pro of the 93 LT1, they make good power. The typically put down 250 rwhp STOCK, they are underrated.
IMO, if you plan on modding the car, for $700 more you can get this...
http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?t=340310
As for LT1 vs LS1...out the box, LS1 is the clear winner in the power department, but once you start modding either, it levels out quickly.2003 Lightning 12.618@112.80<br />1996 Camaro Z28 11.751@115.96 MPH soon stupid fast!<br />1999 Mustang V6 15.36@90.92 MPH<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/\" target=\"_blank\">1996 Camaro Z28</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/Melissa_V6_Mustang\" target=\"_blank\">1999 Mustang V6</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/Ford_svt_lightning\" target=\"_blank\">2003 Lightning</a>
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
by ssms5411So my truck is finally getting some work done, after 17 years, Oil pressure sensor went out and it’s located under the lower intake manifold. Have to...2 weeks ago
Comment