Help with these times - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Help with these times

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Help with these times

    Alright, it was my first tim on the strip when I got these times down. Since then I've worked on launches to try to get faster. I just cant figure out why I'm running these times with these mods... Hopefully looking at my slips will help out because I'm confused.


    I dont think I was spinning and I'm a decent driver as far as launching off the line and stalling a car.


    R/T : .342
    60' : 2.245
    330 : 6.309
    1/8 : 9.638
    MPH : 74.76
    1000 : 12.532
    1/4 : 15.017 (so close :mad: )
    MPH : 90.40


    R/T : .061
    60' : 2.261
    330 : 6.528
    1/8 : 10.003
    MPH : 72.49
    1000 : 12.943
    1/4 : 15.454
    MPH : 89.56


    R/T : -.040
    60' : 2.42
    330 : 6.351
    1/8 : 9.720
    MPH : 72.70
    1000 : 12.628
    1/4 : 15.122
    MPH 90.25


    I had one run where I nailed the R/T (not sure if that matters on times or not) but the car hung up in first because of tuning I think (to much increased line pressure)....


    Anyways can anyone tell my why I'm running so slow. I dont remember the humidity but the temp was like 70-76. Is it my driving or what?
    2001 V6 Camaro - VTEC Badged, Abbott Racing Heads Sticker, and Loud A$$ Exhaust<br /><br /><b>BUILT NOT BOUGHT</b><br /><br />14.0 @ 96.44 MPH (Street Tires, Before Tranny)<br /><br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/6pakcamaro54\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/6pakcamaro54</a>

  • #2
    BTW - car is automatic. Cammed and tuned, alot of mods look at car domain.
    2001 V6 Camaro - VTEC Badged, Abbott Racing Heads Sticker, and Loud A$$ Exhaust<br /><br /><b>BUILT NOT BOUGHT</b><br /><br />14.0 @ 96.44 MPH (Street Tires, Before Tranny)<br /><br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/6pakcamaro54\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/6pakcamaro54</a>

    Comment


    • #3
      your 60' are pretty bad. you got posi? what about the falken tires do you have?
      lil_scrappy97@yahoo.com

      Comment


      • #4
        It usually comes down to one thing, and yours is the same as the rest. Its your 60 foot time!!!! A 2.4 60' is terrible, on that run, if your 60' was a 2.1 or lower, it would of been a 14 second run. Do you have gears? Is the tune a good tune?

        EDIT: saw that run was a redlight, but still, the 60' is your problem.
        Black \'94 Trans Am A4- SLP CAI & Loudmouth<br />Red \'93 Firebird A4- Ram Air under the WS6 hood, !cat, exhaust.

        Comment


        • #5
          Your 60' times could be alot better. You need to work on your launches. Although you cut a 2.42 short time you got a 15.12 but on your first run you cut a 2.24 short time and ran a 15.017? wierd.

          Are you using drag radials? It looks as if you are spinning off the line with that 60' time. Your trapping at a decent speed for 15.0 1/4 times.

          Was it really humid that day or was the baromertic pressure too high?

          Need to take into account the air density and weather.

          I would say your car needs to be re-tunned. Slow bottom end but good top end.

          Edit: please tell me you did take out your custom box in the trunk!!! Weight reduction will get you in the 14's.

          [ May 17, 2005, 08:43 PM: Message edited by: '98 BlackBird ]
          New Toy Red 94 Formula LT1
          RT: .0006 60': 1.894 1/8 mile: 8.351 @ 84.89 1/4 mile: 12.974 @ 107.81
          crashed Red 96 Camaro 3.8l: 14.91 @ 92.38
          The ex wife's Black 98 Firebird 3.8l: 15.23 @ 88.12

          Comment


          • #6
            Ya, I didnt have any of the subs in.


            It was dyno tuned and he's suppose to be pretty good from what everyone tells me... He's been in racing for over 25 years. If any of you know Ed Wright thats who tuned it.

            The track up here is really sticky. I could barely even get the tires to power stall without getting them wet.


            I have limited slip and 3.42'. So you guys think its the tune?

            The tires are falken 512's. They are pretty sticky and soft.
            2001 V6 Camaro - VTEC Badged, Abbott Racing Heads Sticker, and Loud A$$ Exhaust<br /><br /><b>BUILT NOT BOUGHT</b><br /><br />14.0 @ 96.44 MPH (Street Tires, Before Tranny)<br /><br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/6pakcamaro54\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/6pakcamaro54</a>

            Comment


            • #7
              with that trap speed your car should be capable of 60ft times in the 2.0xx range.
              NJ SPEEDER<br />1976 Camaro LT<br />Crate 350, TH350, 3.90 posi<br />New Jersey F-Body Owners Association<br /><a href=\"http://www.NJFBOA.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.NJFBOA.org</a>

              Comment


              • #8
                What cam do you have? Who did the tune? What other mods do you have?

                No offense, but a 15.0 is pretty crappy for a cammed 3.8

                - Justin
                <a href=\"http://www.njfboa.org\" target=\"_blank\">New Jersey F-Body Owners Association</a><br />1987 Camaro LT - 400sbc, Aluminum L98\'s w/valve job, Comp XE 274, Q-Junk 750, 3.23 posi, 4.10\'s soon.<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.njfboa.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=11\" target=\"_blank\">East Coast F-Body Nationals - August 14, 2005</a>

                Comment


                • #9
                  I have the GT2 cam. It was tuned by Fast Chip (by Ed Wright) and I had all the other mods.


                  You dont have to tell me 15.0 sucks for a cammed 3.8. I'm ****ing embarassed of it.... lol
                  2001 V6 Camaro - VTEC Badged, Abbott Racing Heads Sticker, and Loud A$$ Exhaust<br /><br /><b>BUILT NOT BOUGHT</b><br /><br />14.0 @ 96.44 MPH (Street Tires, Before Tranny)<br /><br /> <a href=\"http://members.cardomain.com/6pakcamaro54\" target=\"_blank\">http://members.cardomain.com/6pakcamaro54</a>

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    you really need to work on your suspension. that short time is terrible. 90mph is plenty to get you into the 14.8's if you can get that down to the 2.0 it belongs at.
                    223hp from a cammed engine sounds very very weak. i know the auto sapped some power, but i woudl think you should pull more than that.
                    if the car was only tuned on the dyno then that may be a big part of your problem. dyno tunes only hit a small representaion of conditions and load. so they are really just ballpark tunes. get some real data logging doen on teh street and strip and have some real custom tuning done. an investment in hptuners is highly recomended.

                    later
                    tim
                    NJ SPEEDER<br />1976 Camaro LT<br />Crate 350, TH350, 3.90 posi<br />New Jersey F-Body Owners Association<br /><a href=\"http://www.NJFBOA.org\" target=\"_blank\">www.NJFBOA.org</a>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      First...... smile..... you drove home in one piece! [img]smile.gif[/img]

                      Second.... I'm looking at your MPH... seems quite low for your RWHP and RWTQ

                      Do you know your curb weight? That may help w/ the low MPH concern

                      Temp, humid, barom psi and D/A are VERY important in guaging the car's ability to make HP and TQ.
                      Race car - gone but not forgotten - 1997 firebird V6
                      nitrous et & mph: 12.168 & 110.95 mph, n/a 13.746 & 96.38 mph
                      2013 Dodge Challenger SRT8: 12.125, 116.45
                      2010 Ford Taurus SHO: no times yet

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by 12secondv6:
                        First...... smile..... you drove home in one piece! [img]smile.gif[/img]

                        Second.... I'm looking at your MPH... seems quite low for your RWHP and RWTQ

                        Do you know your curb weight? That may help w/ the low MPH concern

                        Temp, humid, barom psi and D/A are VERY important in guaging the car's ability to make HP and TQ.
                        All good points there... especially the weather its the summer not the best time for "new bests"

                        What I would do is work on the 60' and getting more consistant.

                        If you get a nice 2.0 60. you could be in the upper-mid 14s.
                        -Eric<br /><a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/id/mustangeater82\" target=\"_blank\">2000 NBM V6 Camaro 5-speed</a> T-top <i>converted</i><br /><b>14.467@95.45mph</b> <i>$0 in mods</i><br /><i>The member formerly known as MustangEater8251</i>

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          If i can pull 2.3 60' times with crappy open 3.08's, subs, and being completely stock....then you should be easily in the range of 2.0's.

                          Comment

                          Latest Topics

                          Collapse

                          FORUM SPONSORS

                          Collapse
                          Working...
                          X