stupid mustang drivers - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

stupid mustang drivers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: stupid mustang drivers

    all normal bone stock automatic GT

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: stupid mustang drivers

      what year tho...5.0s arnt anythin specail, mid 90's r alright but the 4.6 stangs u will def not keep up with


      87 Firebird RIP
      96 Camaro RS RIP
      94 Patriot Red 1LE Z28 - Sold
      02 WS6 TA - Sold

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: stupid mustang drivers

        Originally posted by Camarorulz
        Your automatic transmission is better than his: it's well known that Ford automatics tend to have more drivetrain loss. That, along with the other conditions, makes up for the difference.
        Keep in mind the verts. are add weight.
        Red 1998 Camaro<br />Mods so far=<br />K&N

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: stupid mustang drivers

          Originally posted by MAROA4L32
          it was a 2001 mustang convertible 3.8 auto its considerably heavier then my car and its a ghetto strip it just has the light no computer stuff
          so u beat an auto vert. good job they run mid high 16's dont they? want a cookie? nah j/p man a kill is a kill.

          haha auto stangs (excluding 05+) suck i had a friend w/ an 04 and i would give him .5-1 second head starts, ran an auto w/ exhaust and chip and won too that was a lil closer...

          so anti mustang, you guys act like this is a camaro message board or something?
          silver manual 2000 v6 mustang.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: stupid mustang drivers

            Originally posted by v6 stang
            so anti mustang, you guys act like this is a camaro message board or something?
            Camaro board!??!!? :bs:

            We <3 Mustangs.
            1998 M5 3.8 Mystic Teal Camaro<br />Flowmaster exhaust, Pacesetter headers, 3\" cat, 3\" S-pipe, whisper lid, ram air, Spec Stage 1 clutch, Poly Trans mount, Walbro 255LPH. Numerous appearance mods.<br /><br /> <a href=\"http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2130533\" target=\"_blank\">http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2130533</a>

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: stupid mustang drivers

              wow how gay... im gonna call :bs: on beating a Gt stang with a 3.8 unless its hevily modded...

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: stupid mustang drivers

                A decent stock 99+3.8 5 speed would mop up his car...when he can do that, then he should start looking for the GT's.
                2003 Lightning 12.618@112.80<br />1996 Camaro Z28 11.751@115.96 MPH soon stupid fast!<br />1999 Mustang V6 15.36@90.92 MPH<br /><br /><a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/\" target=\"_blank\">1996 Camaro Z28</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/Melissa_V6_Mustang\" target=\"_blank\">1999 Mustang V6</a> <a href=\"http://www.geocities.com/jmaxnakron/Ford_svt_lightning\" target=\"_blank\">2003 Lightning</a>

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: stupid mustang drivers

                  Originally posted by MAROA4L32
                  like i said stupid mustang drivers
                  You should be careful sterotyping drivers that run mustangs..........

                  Being there are a few of us on this board that own them. =)
                  Eric

                  2005 Mustang 4.0
                  1996 Camaro Conv
                  2000 Ford Excursion

                  "Darkness Falls"

                  Comment

                  Latest Topics

                  Collapse

                  • Dongrossmd
                    Throttle Position Sensor trouble shooting
                    by Dongrossmd
                    I’m new. I actually don’t own a Camaro or firebird. I do have a 2000 Camaro 3.8 fly by throttle and 4l60e. This is installed in a 1980 Triumph TR7...
                    2 weeks ago
                  • ssms5411
                    New stereo
                    by ssms5411
                    Not much going on, replaced my Kenwood double din stereo with a Pioneer double din, the Kenwood had problems. Then replaced my power inverter for my reverse...
                    3 weeks ago

                  FORUM SPONSORS

                  Collapse
                  Working...
                  X