radials didn't work as planned - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

radials didn't work as planned

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • radials didn't work as planned

    Rather disappointing night with the new radials and race rims...I ran slower then I did with street tires....

    best run of the night was

    60'...1.958
    330.... 5.909
    1/8... 9.242
    MPH 73.73
    1/4.... 14.608
    MPH.... 91.35


    I dunno whats goin on...I think my tire pressure gauge was off...I set the tires to 20 psi the other day...when I got to the track it read 13psi...didnt make much sense to me since the tire didnt look wrinkly at all...I went all the way down to 10psi accoring to the gauge...Car never bogged or anything...I just could not get a solid launch....my 60's suck for radials...

    first run I didnt heat the slicks up enough because I missed the water box and skittered up to the line as I tried to burn em...2-3rd time I only got one wheel wet....so I had a one tire burn out...4th time I got both tires in the box...got nice burn out...but couldnt get a solid launch again...

    The DA calculator doesnt seem to be working at the moment, so here is my numbers....

    elevation 670 feet

    Temp was about 68-69 degrees, Humidity was between 80-94% for the night with the HPA being 1013.
    Last edited by LETZRIDE; 08-01-2009, 01:22 AM.

    2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
    1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


    Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

  • #2
    Re: radials didn't work as planned

    Are the tires burning across the entire tread now? How old are they?
    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: radials didn't work as planned

      The air last night was terrible,and on Fridays the prep ay Cayuga is usual bad.

      With that humidty it was probably like being at 3000/4000 feet.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: radials didn't work as planned

        Originally posted by LETZRIDE View Post
        Rather disappointing night with the new radials and race rims...I ran slower then I did with street tires....

        best run of the night was

        60'...1.958
        330.... 5.909
        1/8... 9.242
        MPH 73.73
        1/4.... 14.608
        MPH.... 91.35


        I dunno whats goin on...I think my tire pressure gauge was off...I set the tires to 20 psi the other day...when I got to the track it read 13psi...didnt make much sense to me since the tire didnt look wrinkly at all...I went all the way down to 10psi accoring to the gauge...Car never bogged or anything...I just could not get a solid launch....my 60's suck for radials...

        first run I didnt heat the slicks up enough because I missed the water box and skittered up to the line as I tried to burn em...2-3rd time I only got one wheel wet....so I had a one tire burn out...4th time I got both tires in the box...got nice burn out...but couldnt get a solid launch again...

        The DA calculator doesnt seem to be working at the moment, so here is my numbers....

        elevation 670 feet

        Temp was about 68-69 degrees, Humidity was between 80-94% for the night with the HPA being 1013.
        If the PSI was that low, the tires just slow the car down (or bogs it). (Most tracks have an air compressor to fill the tires back up with air.) Did you buy these tires new or used? Now you see what I mean about doing a proper burnout?! ;)

        What rpm did you launch at? Sounds like the car needs a better tune too. Your overall ET/mph is a bit low. Do you keep any data logs? The conditions looked ok, except for the humidity. I'd say get some skinnies, go back and practice, practice, practice! You're best times will come in the fall when it's cold out.
        2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
        1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
        2011 Cadillac CTS-V
        2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
        2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: radials didn't work as planned

          Btw, what was your best ET prior to this one? What were the conditions?
          2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
          1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
          2011 Cadillac CTS-V
          2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
          2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: radials didn't work as planned

            Originally posted by bigbrian442 View Post
            Are the tires burning across the entire tread now? How old are they?
            Yes, they appear to be burning right across now. I bought the tires used, but they are brand new...the guy said he bought it all last year....the tires still have all the nipple on them...they are soft and gummy...


            If the PSI was that low, the tires just slow the car down (or bogs it). (Most tracks have an air compressor to fill the tires back up with air.) Did you buy these tires new or used? Now you see what I mean about doing a proper burnout?!

            What rpm did you launch at? Sounds like the car needs a better tune too. Your overall ET/mph is a bit low. Do you keep any data logs? The conditions looked ok, except for the humidity. I'd say get some skinnies, go back and practice, practice, practice! You're best times will come in the fall when it's cold out.
            My best ET before was 14.3

            I need to buy a digital guage...I swear mine wasnt right last night...there was just no way...at 10 psi, my tire wall would have been wrinkled and it wasn't...it still looked fairly solid, but you could see a slight dent to it at the bottom, so it was a lower psi...but no way it was 10 I dont think...

            I know it rained EVERYWHERE, except for the track...literally...it rained about 10 mins North, south, east, and west of the track...but not at this location...weird huh?...I know the humidity in the area was horrible...it didnt feel humid, but about 10 mins out from the track, you were driving through fog....

            I managed to get two data logs in before my battery died on me...this is more or less the same tune on there that netted me 14.3...but it does seem to be going quite rich up top...

            My mph was absolutly horrible...I was trapping 90.50 before the cam!!...91mph is brutal....


            apparently the da is 1789 for the night...corrections show I would of had another 14.3 run.... which sounds about right considering I was only cutting 1.9 60' and that is what I cut when I got my 14.3 last time...

            2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
            1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


            Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: radials didn't work as planned

              This is a video of the verry very first run...as you can see, I missed the water box entirly...didn't get a good burnout at all...skittered off to the line trying.... this was a 1.9 60' run though...

              you need to click/copy the link... http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.ph...259000729&ev=0

              2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
              1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


              Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: radials didn't work as planned

                The MPH was down because of the humidity. It kills power and is harder to drive through. You either need to power brake the car to heat the tires or get a line lock so you can sit in one place and heat the tires. The car didn't look to be spinning all that much in the video.
                sigpic

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: radials didn't work as planned

                  Originally posted by bigbrian442 View Post
                  The MPH was down because of the humidity. It kills power and is harder to drive through. You either need to power brake the car to heat the tires or get a line lock so you can sit in one place and heat the tires. The car didn't look to be spinning all that much in the video.
                  No I know...that was the very first run I had on them...I was watching the guy, and he told me to stop...I thought I was in the water box, but I hadn't gone far enough back yet...so the tires weren't wet...when I mashed the break and the gas, the car just pulled forward.... that was a 14.6 run....

                  2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
                  1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


                  Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: radials didn't work as planned

                    That was more of a dry hop for street tires. ;) BUT it looked to be a perfect launch/run regardless.

                    What rpm did you launch at? If you want the best ETs, you have to beat the **** out of the car and launch it as hard as possible. You should take your time a little more too. There's no rush. Light the first set of bulbs, take a deep breath, pull up slightly, then bring the revs up as high as possible. It's tough when it's pro-tree. Just keep practicing.
                    2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
                    1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
                    2011 Cadillac CTS-V
                    2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
                    2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: radials didn't work as planned

                      Oh, yeah... and go on a nice cold, dry night!
                      2004 CE Corvette 10.86@132mph
                      1996 Supercharged/Nitrous Camaro RS (For Sale)
                      2011 Cadillac CTS-V
                      2011 Mitsubishi Eclipse Spyder GT-P
                      2006 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: radials didn't work as planned

                        haha...I launched that one at about 3000-3200 rpm....

                        2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
                        1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


                        Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: radials didn't work as planned

                          Originally posted by LETZRIDE View Post
                          This is a video of the verry very first run...as you can see, I missed the water box entirly...didn't get a good burnout at all...skittered off to the line trying.... this was a 1.9 60' run though...

                          you need to click/copy the link... http://b.static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.ph...259000729&ev=0
                          I'm not a racer like you or most people here, but I see what you mean about not getting that burn out.

                          Since you have that shouldn't you play more with your launches. Like instead of launching at 3000 maybe you should try 2500-2700. I know someone who did it this way and got his best time ever.

                          I think with more practice and finding that sweet spot you'll get better.

                          1998 Firebird . 1989 Firebird XS . 1986 Fiero GT

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: radials didn't work as planned

                            Originally posted by Mighty Thor View Post
                            I'm not a racer like you or most people here, but I see what you mean about not getting that burn out.

                            Since you have that shouldn't you play more with your launches. Like instead of launching at 3000 maybe you should try 2500-2700. I know someone who did it this way and got his best time ever.

                            I think with more practice and finding that sweet spot you'll get better.

                            thats exactly right...the sweet spot of the stall is much lower I believe...I'll get it down eventually (I hope)

                            2002 SOM Z28 Camaro - 12.9 @ 104 mph
                            1996 3800 Camaro - 13.43 @ 100.77 mph


                            Project Cars | How To Guides | Scratch Repair | Synthetic Oil

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: radials didn't work as planned

                              Don't brake-stall. Flash the converter at idle. Holding your foot on the brake and trying to hold the RPMs as high as possible is NOT the way to launch an automatic. You need a quick hit on the converter from a low RPM to flash it to it's proper stall speed for a good launch. Next time, pull up to the line, hold the brake, and either hold at idle or hold a very low RPM (1000-1200). Let off the brake and stomp the pedal to the floor on the launch.
                              -<i>Travis</i><br /><b>99 Trans Am, Pewter, A4</b> Forged, stalled, and cammed<br /><b>85 Buick Regal WH1 T-Type</b> It\'d be cool if it ran...<br /><b>94 Camaro 3.4, Teal, M5</b> The daily beater

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X