v6 dyno results

[Mike88]

I'm borrowing the following from http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24205

Also featured on homepage.

Just got back from the shop. The goal of the day was simply to get *baseline* numbers, so we can justify the real world gains of anything added to the car. Info below:


Dyno type: Mustang
Filter value: 33
Air temp: 78F
Humidity: 83% (ouch)
Car: 2010 Camaro
Engine: 3.6L V6 Direct Injection
Trans: 6L50 6spd automatic
Mod: Bone stock, right down to the plastic still on my carpet.
Octane: 87 (lol)

Best run:
246RWHP | 220lbs/tq

Notes:
* Torque curve is basically flat from 2500 to 5800, dipping by the 6900 mark

* HP curve is a steady arc, flattening out right at redline

* Factory tune is PIG RICH , holding down in the 11.4 range through the bulk of the run. There is a good bit of power hiding in just a tune.

* We did a run w/ the AC on just for fun - you can see clearly where it was shut off. Lots of power loss at the accy :(

[u2b]iY-58cxibNk[/u2b]




Overall, the numbers are spot on with their factory ratings through an automatic. The exhaust and intake is going to do wonders for the car. The over-rich tune from factory, and the high speed processing capabilities of the Motec ME9 are just begging this motor to be turbo/supercharged.

More to follow throughout the next week or so as parts start to trickle in ;)

Cheers!

[Mighty Thor]

Re: v6 dyno results

Very nice. That's more than what a bone stock LT1 dyno at.

My bro's friend his 350z dyno at 234rwhp bone stock too. So for comparison that's pretty good. Too bad though that it weighs so much. That car can be a high to mid 13 sec. if it weighs in the low 3000.

[1998silverbird]

Re: v6 dyno results

Swap in a 10 bolt to save some weight!!

[venom3300]

Re: v6 dyno results

220lbs/tq.... ouch

[ssms5411]

Re: v6 dyno results

220lbs/tq.... ouch

Theres not a V-TEC motor in it is there? LOL

[venom3300]

Re: v6 dyno results

^

[auto666]

Re: v6 dyno results

220lbs/tq.... ouch

thats exactly what you'll be saying when one walks your a** :poke:

[ssms5411]

Re: v6 dyno results

thats exactly what you'll be saying when one walks your a** :poke:

N/A right now with my mods and weight I would smoke A new V6 Camaro, my car is 2850-2900 lBS while they weigh a fat 3700-3800LBS. My est. dyno N/A is around 220 Hp/ 240 TQ, I will dyno it before the turbo goes on then it is time to beat some SS @ss with the turbo, expect to dyno 350-400 at the wheels with 10-12 PSI. This means the new SS Camaros with their weight would have to dyno over 500 HP or so to make it a fair race since every 100LBS is 10HP and I would bet my suspension is 100X better than the stock suspension of the new Camaros. So who would walk whos @ss? should check out my cardomain site out before posting. I'm not bragging just saying the truth and why I have spent so much money into my V6 and the oringinal owner, 13 years of modding gets you alot of mods, esp. when it was paid off in 3 years, so 10 years of no payments and that money going into the car.

[auto666]

Re: v6 dyno results

N/A right now with my mods and weight I would smoke A new V6 Camaro, my car is 2850-2900 lBS while they weigh a fat 3700-3800LBS. My est. dyno N/A is around 220 Hp/ 240 TQ, I will dyno it before the turbo goes on then it is time to beat some SS @ss with the turbo, expect to dyno 350-400 at the wheels with 10-12 PSI. This means the new SS Camaros with their weight would have to dyno over 500 HP or so to make it a fair race since every 100LBS is 10HP and I would bet my suspension is 100X better than the stock suspension of the new Camaros. So who would walk whos @ss? should check out my cardomain site out before posting. I'm not bragging just saying the truth and why I have spent so much money into my V6 and the oringinal owner, 13 years of modding gets you alot of mods, esp. when it was paid off in 3 years, so 10 years of no payments and that money going into the car.

lol dont get your panties in a bind your names not venom3300 i said nothing about you ssms5411.

[venom3300]

Re: v6 dyno results

lol dont get your panties in a bind your names not venom3300 i said nothing about you ssms5411.

dude im running 1995 technology... if the new one cant beat me, thats sad. im just saying it has a good bit less torque than hp and about a 19% drive train loss. and mine will always have 1 thing over it IMO... looks

[ssms5411]

Re: v6 dyno results

lol dont get your panties in a bind your names not venom3300 i said nothing about you ssms5411.

I'm fine knowing the new Camaros will be slower than my little V6, I dind'y know you were directing it at someone else(sorry about that). I like the looks of my Camaro also compared to the new ones or anything else, thats why I have kept it for so long. I love lighter cars with smaller engines with turbos I think their bad@ss, just like Supras, I don't really like 4 cly. cars though just too cramped in the engine bay like V8's.