higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application - FirebirdV6.com/CamaroV6.com Message Board

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

    Originally posted by ssms5411 View Post
    Running a cam only is fine for stock heads, its when you want to run more lift adding 1.9 rockers is where your going to need the guides cut. If you have a stock cam then 1.9 rockers is fine.
    See his cam plus 1.9 rockers dont even put him over a half inch of lift.
    Team NoVa

    2000 Firebird- Intake, Pacesetters, !cat, full 2.5 to flowcrapster, 1.9 rockers, LS6 springs and Intense modded retainers, WS6 speedlines, T/A bumpers and hatch, 5 spd swapped, SOON TO BE nitrous'd and cammed.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

      we can't possibly be talking about the valve guides. that doesn't make any sense at all... it must be the "pedestal". and btw i would go with 1.9's across the board. its just that i found a good deal on these. i did contact zzp, and i'm going to take a picture of them, and they should be able to tell me what size the smaller is.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

        ssms is running the cam and 1.7's i believe.
        i've never dug into a 3.8, but these are the rockers and pedestals i got with the rockers springs and push rods.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

          Originally posted by flamingchicken View Post
          See his cam plus 1.9 rockers dont even put him over a half inch of lift.
          Stock heads are maxed at something like .530 lift, I had mine cut to a .600 lift.
          08' L76 6.0L 4X4 Chevy EXT.Cab LTZ Vortec MAX with Snug top cover, Dynomax exhaust,Hptuners& K&N intake
          96' Camaro M5 to A4 conversion, alot of mods . GT35R Turbo full suspension. Built engine

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

            Originally posted by thebeewantsboost View Post
            we can't possibly be talking about the valve guides. that doesn't make any sense at all....
            It's the valve guides. Did those rockers come with taco sauce? Sweet!

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

              Originally posted by ssms5411 View Post
              Stock heads are maxed at something like .530 lift, I had mine cut to a .600 lift.
              .485/.490 with 1.9 rockers.

              Those are the numbers he posted, and if correct, then he should be okay without cutting the guides.

              Unless there is something I am missing.
              Team NoVa

              2000 Firebird- Intake, Pacesetters, !cat, full 2.5 to flowcrapster, 1.9 rockers, LS6 springs and Intense modded retainers, WS6 speedlines, T/A bumpers and hatch, 5 spd swapped, SOON TO BE nitrous'd and cammed.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

                i dont think anybody ever said that i would need them cut, not sure how we got off on this topic. i sent a pic of them to zzp and the guy i spoke with seemed to think they were. 1.8 and 1.85. but said it was a such a long time ago that he doesn't remember.

                they came with arbys sauce also
                Last edited by thebeewantsboost; 09-27-2012, 04:59 PM.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

                  for the sake of learning does anybody have pictures of valve guides that were cut to accommodate higher lift? i'm having issues understanding how that would work. where does the valve spring go?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

                    OOoohhh this whole time i've been thinking that the cutting was because the push rod.was going to be to close to it or something... which obviously doesn't make sense... the valve guide are cut so that the spring will actually sit lower. and theres more room for more lift. right?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

                      at 1.8 and 1.85 these are the lift numbers.

                      .464
                      .477
                      dunno if i should just wait and get 1.9's or try these out. i've been lookin at turbo cams. and some have the same intake and exhaust lift some favor the intake and some favor the exhaust. kinda shocking to me that they favor the intake. unless the duration is different or something. i definitely have alot to learn when it comes to cams.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

                        Originally posted by thebeewantsboost View Post
                        OOoohhh this whole time i've been thinking that the cutting was because the push rod.was going to be to close to it or something... which obviously doesn't make sense... the valve guide are cut so that the spring will actually sit lower. and theres more room for more lift. right?
                        The valve guides are cut so the keeper and retainer do not hit the guide when using a high lift cam.
                        sigpic

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

                          ooooh so literally just the guide. i thought the part of the head where the spring or retainer sits on, was cut also. good to know.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

                            intiresting read
                            http://www.camaroz28.com/forums/forc...e-help-333673/
                            "The theory behind reverse-split turbo cams is this: If, as with most turbo systems, exhaust pressure is 2 X boost pressure, then the exhaust is also around 3 X more dense than a NA engine. More dense means it needs less time (duration) to escape the cylinder."

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: higher ratio rocker arms in turbo application

                              http://www.hotrod.com/pitstop/hrdp_1...s/viewall.html after reading this i decided that the higher ratio rockers aren't right for me setup so i will be selling them.
                              1.85/1.8 with modified pedestals, pushrods and bolts etc

                              Comment

                              Latest Topics

                              Collapse

                              FORUM SPONSORS

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X